Jack Oscar
02-23-2004, 10:42 PM
Fairly loose passive game,
Player to my right raises UTG +2, I raise with AA.
Now he is a straight ABC player - and has been getting some tough beats, e.g. has lost twice with KK against gut shot straights. His raise means a premium holding
TT or better, AK, AKs or AQ or maybe KQs that is about it.
All fold including blinds.
Flop comes K 8 4 rainbow.
Check bet, call.
Turn is a queen completing the rainbow.
I know he might have KK or QQ, but I auto bet my over pair.
He checkraises.
I know he has KK or QQ, just know it but talk myself into a call thinking he might have AK, AA or KQs (which I would 8 outs against).
I call river is a rag. He bets and I call.
My question is does anyone play this hand any different.
Do you check behind on the turn?
DO you muck to the check raise, muck on the river.
results in white.
<font color="white">he showed KK for the nuts <font color="white"> </font> </font>
Player to my right raises UTG +2, I raise with AA.
Now he is a straight ABC player - and has been getting some tough beats, e.g. has lost twice with KK against gut shot straights. His raise means a premium holding
TT or better, AK, AKs or AQ or maybe KQs that is about it.
All fold including blinds.
Flop comes K 8 4 rainbow.
Check bet, call.
Turn is a queen completing the rainbow.
I know he might have KK or QQ, but I auto bet my over pair.
He checkraises.
I know he has KK or QQ, just know it but talk myself into a call thinking he might have AK, AA or KQs (which I would 8 outs against).
I call river is a rag. He bets and I call.
My question is does anyone play this hand any different.
Do you check behind on the turn?
DO you muck to the check raise, muck on the river.
results in white.
<font color="white">he showed KK for the nuts <font color="white"> </font> </font>