PrayingMantis
01-20-2004, 07:35 PM
I find myself making questionable decisions when I'm not too short-stacked. Is this one of them?
10+1 2 tables SNG, 7 left, blinds 100/200, I'm a little below avarage w/T3000. I'm holding 88 on the BB.
UTG folds, UTG+1, smallest stack w/T1200, raises to T600. He plays pretty weak-tight. All fold to me, I raise him all-in. I think I'm considered a tight player at the table, and not too aggressive.
What do you think of this move? Is it +EV, if you take him for having over-cards, and that he might even fold (not very likely, but possible)? Is my stack too healthy for this?
Results (in white font):
<font color="white"> He thinks for a while, then calls and shows AJo. River is A and I double him up. My stack is too small now, and soon I bust out on another coin flip. </font>
PrayingMantis
10+1 2 tables SNG, 7 left, blinds 100/200, I'm a little below avarage w/T3000. I'm holding 88 on the BB.
UTG folds, UTG+1, smallest stack w/T1200, raises to T600. He plays pretty weak-tight. All fold to me, I raise him all-in. I think I'm considered a tight player at the table, and not too aggressive.
What do you think of this move? Is it +EV, if you take him for having over-cards, and that he might even fold (not very likely, but possible)? Is my stack too healthy for this?
Results (in white font):
<font color="white"> He thinks for a while, then calls and shows AJo. River is A and I double him up. My stack is too small now, and soon I bust out on another coin flip. </font>
PrayingMantis