09-07-2001, 05:04 PM
This is a generic question.
mostly this applies to situations when you're last to act. On the turn when you are bet into and you have a calling hand (a descent hand, but not great - top pair with medium kicker - say QTs and the board is Qc7s6h2h). Is it always better to raise, if you're already planning to call the river. It would seem that the effect of this aggression many times would be to have other players check to you on the river. At that time you can decide whether to bet or check. If you get re-raised after your raise on the turn, you can lay it down. If you get bet into on the river after you raise the turn you can lay it down. Sometimes you'll win outright on the turn after your raise. The point is that the cost is the same, but the play is FAR more aggressive.
And if you routinely do this, as I'm beginning to, how do you change up your play to keep the observant players guessing? An observant player will re-raise you after watching you make this play and fold. What do you do?
Thanks,
-Michael
mostly this applies to situations when you're last to act. On the turn when you are bet into and you have a calling hand (a descent hand, but not great - top pair with medium kicker - say QTs and the board is Qc7s6h2h). Is it always better to raise, if you're already planning to call the river. It would seem that the effect of this aggression many times would be to have other players check to you on the river. At that time you can decide whether to bet or check. If you get re-raised after your raise on the turn, you can lay it down. If you get bet into on the river after you raise the turn you can lay it down. Sometimes you'll win outright on the turn after your raise. The point is that the cost is the same, but the play is FAR more aggressive.
And if you routinely do this, as I'm beginning to, how do you change up your play to keep the observant players guessing? An observant player will re-raise you after watching you make this play and fold. What do you do?
Thanks,
-Michael