05-08-2002, 04:07 AM
i just saw your article in c.p almost missed it...the one about calling when you know your beat.
i think it was a fantastic concept. i liken it to a reverse bluff really...your doing it for the 'advertisement' that you cant get runover. i remember reading this concept in your book, and it often pops in my head when i feel i havent seen a showdown from players HU for awhile...even if i know i had good folds...
sometimes you can get caught up in the fact you can read players, only to miss the point that theyve adjusted to the fact that your not calling enough...
i find this also works in reverse as far as looking for spots to bluff and players to do it against...these types of articles are good to look at from both sides i think...
great article, and good refresher...
b
i think it was a fantastic concept. i liken it to a reverse bluff really...your doing it for the 'advertisement' that you cant get runover. i remember reading this concept in your book, and it often pops in my head when i feel i havent seen a showdown from players HU for awhile...even if i know i had good folds...
sometimes you can get caught up in the fact you can read players, only to miss the point that theyve adjusted to the fact that your not calling enough...
i find this also works in reverse as far as looking for spots to bluff and players to do it against...these types of articles are good to look at from both sides i think...
great article, and good refresher...
b