Magician
12-05-2003, 01:34 PM
Hi,
I'd like some rules of thumb about the right bet size in NLHE/PLHE cash games online ($3/$6 NL/PL mostly).
I find that when I bet the pot that I get action only when I'm beat and that a bet that big has me trapping myself when I do get called.
Should I be doing the following:
a) If there are draws on the board, generally bet more (maybe 60-80% of the pot depending on how threatening the draws are)
b) If there are no draws on the board, generally bet less (40-50% of the pot)
c) If I am drawing to a flush and/or a straight and I am trying to build a pot against multiple opponents, bet small enough to get multiple callers but large enough to slow opponents down from raising
d) In these tight online games it seems the only way to get action is to bet 40-50% and hope to get called by hands that are good but probably losing but which the opponent can't bring himself to fold because the bet is small relative to the pot (I've found myself guilty of this type of call lately and have lost a bit too much money this way)
e) It's easier to get an opponent pot-committed with bets of 40-50% of the pot on the flop and turn - once he's called twice with a good but losing hand it's very hard for him to lay it down and he is more likely to pay you off further on the river (again, I've found myself on the wrong end of this too many times lately)
f) If I bet small with my made hands, it also enables me to get away with a lot of cheap bluffs
So what I'm saying is: perhaps in these ultra-tight online games with lots of slowplaying and trapping - maybe a standard bet size of 40-50% of the pot is the way to go.
Of course when you bet less (say 40-50% of the pot) you get less of your money in with the best of it then if you had bet more - but that still has to beat getting called only when you are behind.
I'd like some rules of thumb about the right bet size in NLHE/PLHE cash games online ($3/$6 NL/PL mostly).
I find that when I bet the pot that I get action only when I'm beat and that a bet that big has me trapping myself when I do get called.
Should I be doing the following:
a) If there are draws on the board, generally bet more (maybe 60-80% of the pot depending on how threatening the draws are)
b) If there are no draws on the board, generally bet less (40-50% of the pot)
c) If I am drawing to a flush and/or a straight and I am trying to build a pot against multiple opponents, bet small enough to get multiple callers but large enough to slow opponents down from raising
d) In these tight online games it seems the only way to get action is to bet 40-50% and hope to get called by hands that are good but probably losing but which the opponent can't bring himself to fold because the bet is small relative to the pot (I've found myself guilty of this type of call lately and have lost a bit too much money this way)
e) It's easier to get an opponent pot-committed with bets of 40-50% of the pot on the flop and turn - once he's called twice with a good but losing hand it's very hard for him to lay it down and he is more likely to pay you off further on the river (again, I've found myself on the wrong end of this too many times lately)
f) If I bet small with my made hands, it also enables me to get away with a lot of cheap bluffs
So what I'm saying is: perhaps in these ultra-tight online games with lots of slowplaying and trapping - maybe a standard bet size of 40-50% of the pot is the way to go.
Of course when you bet less (say 40-50% of the pot) you get less of your money in with the best of it then if you had bet more - but that still has to beat getting called only when you are behind.