01-25-2002, 12:24 AM
the basic idea of this question is when to raise assuming you know you will be called
lets assume im playing in a 5 handed game with loose-passive players (except myself)
to use a specific hand as an example
player 1 posts the blind (only one blind in this game)
2,3,4 calls, im on the button and raise with AKo, the blind folds, everyone else calls
(9 bets in the pot)
the flop is something like 2 7 K rainbow
2,3 check, 4 bets, i raise, 2,3 fold, 4 calls
so now im heads up with player 4 and lets assume hes holding Kx and that he doesnt have 2-pair
the outcome of the hand is irrelevant
my question is this:
should i have raised preflop when i know im against bad players who will call me anyway?
my thinking is this:
on the one hand, i think the preflop raise is bad, because then when i raise on the flop, my opponent gets 11-1 odds which is almost what he needs to chase me so its not a horrible call, whereas had i not raised preflop, he gets 8-1 odds, making his call much worse. (i realize i better player would have folded Kx both preflop and vs a raise after the flop, but were assuming bad players here)
on the other hand, i think the preflop raise is good, because im putting more money in with the probable best hand and even if i give my opponent better pot odds, my post flop raise still has a positive ev, right?
so, which play is correct and what is a good example of properly manipulating pot odds in a limit game?
any help would be greatly appreciated
thanks
lets assume im playing in a 5 handed game with loose-passive players (except myself)
to use a specific hand as an example
player 1 posts the blind (only one blind in this game)
2,3,4 calls, im on the button and raise with AKo, the blind folds, everyone else calls
(9 bets in the pot)
the flop is something like 2 7 K rainbow
2,3 check, 4 bets, i raise, 2,3 fold, 4 calls
so now im heads up with player 4 and lets assume hes holding Kx and that he doesnt have 2-pair
the outcome of the hand is irrelevant
my question is this:
should i have raised preflop when i know im against bad players who will call me anyway?
my thinking is this:
on the one hand, i think the preflop raise is bad, because then when i raise on the flop, my opponent gets 11-1 odds which is almost what he needs to chase me so its not a horrible call, whereas had i not raised preflop, he gets 8-1 odds, making his call much worse. (i realize i better player would have folded Kx both preflop and vs a raise after the flop, but were assuming bad players here)
on the other hand, i think the preflop raise is good, because im putting more money in with the probable best hand and even if i give my opponent better pot odds, my post flop raise still has a positive ev, right?
so, which play is correct and what is a good example of properly manipulating pot odds in a limit game?
any help would be greatly appreciated
thanks