GuyOnTilt
11-24-2003, 02:04 AM
I'm taking some time tonight to look back through my stats, hand histories, and notes from live games to see if I can find some leaks. Anyway, I came across this old hand from about 6 months ago and I found it very interesting. Keep in mind I had only been playing poker for 2 months when this occurred. /images/graemlins/tongue.gif
Playing 6/12 9-handed. Table is very loose/passive except for BB in this hand who is very aggressive on all streets if he's never slowed down.
I'm dealt Q /images/graemlins/spade.gifJ /images/graemlins/spade.gif in MP. UTG limps, folds to MP1 who limps, I limp in. Folds to CO limper, Button folds, SB completes, BB knuckles. 6 to the flop for 6 SB's.
Flop comes: Q /images/graemlins/diamond.gif8 /images/graemlins/heart.gif6 /images/graemlins/spade.gif
SB checks, BB bets, folds to me and I raise. CO calls 2 cold, SB folds, BB 3-bets. I call and CO calls. 3 to the turn for 7.5 BB's.
Turn comes: Q /images/graemlins/club.gif[Q /images/graemlins/diamond.gif8 /images/graemlins/heart.gif6 /images/graemlins/spade.gif]
BB bets out, I raise, CO 3-bets, and BB caps. I think and finally muck.
Here's what I was thinking back then: "I have to be behind, and I muck figuring that I'm drawing to 3 clean outs, maybe 4 if they both flopped sets. And there's always the off-chance one has a set, and the other has AQ, which would give me 3 more outs, but that's so unlikely I didn't factor it into my decision. I can't beat both of them without improving, and even getting 17:2 I still don't have the odds to suck out, even with the 4 or 6 extra bets I'd make on the river if I did improve, and knowing that if I call the turn, I must call the river which could be 2 or 3 more bets."
What's right and what's wrong with how I played this hand?
GoT
Playing 6/12 9-handed. Table is very loose/passive except for BB in this hand who is very aggressive on all streets if he's never slowed down.
I'm dealt Q /images/graemlins/spade.gifJ /images/graemlins/spade.gif in MP. UTG limps, folds to MP1 who limps, I limp in. Folds to CO limper, Button folds, SB completes, BB knuckles. 6 to the flop for 6 SB's.
Flop comes: Q /images/graemlins/diamond.gif8 /images/graemlins/heart.gif6 /images/graemlins/spade.gif
SB checks, BB bets, folds to me and I raise. CO calls 2 cold, SB folds, BB 3-bets. I call and CO calls. 3 to the turn for 7.5 BB's.
Turn comes: Q /images/graemlins/club.gif[Q /images/graemlins/diamond.gif8 /images/graemlins/heart.gif6 /images/graemlins/spade.gif]
BB bets out, I raise, CO 3-bets, and BB caps. I think and finally muck.
Here's what I was thinking back then: "I have to be behind, and I muck figuring that I'm drawing to 3 clean outs, maybe 4 if they both flopped sets. And there's always the off-chance one has a set, and the other has AQ, which would give me 3 more outs, but that's so unlikely I didn't factor it into my decision. I can't beat both of them without improving, and even getting 17:2 I still don't have the odds to suck out, even with the 4 or 6 extra bets I'd make on the river if I did improve, and knowing that if I call the turn, I must call the river which could be 2 or 3 more bets."
What's right and what's wrong with how I played this hand?
GoT