PDA

View Full Version : suppression of dissent example


brad
11-08-2003, 09:41 AM
main thing is that it is just constant harassment, like if for some reason you piss off the sheriff or someting and find all of a sudden that u are being ticketed for every little thing you do wrong, and even if you fight and win most of them its just a drain on your resources. but to an outside observer nothing is wrong and you seem like a whiner.

probably the scariest part is
'
"If they had been inside council chambers or outside the building, nothing would have happened," Mr. Sullivan said. "This is a public area. To avoid offending anyone, we say you can’t do it in a public area."
'
law enforcement and beaurocrats are just over the top and getting worse.
-----------------------------------------------------


http://www.toledoblade.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20031107/NEWS16/111070143

City of Toledo | Article published Friday, November 7, 2003
Gerken, Szollosi shown the door as Government Center security says no to critics of Patriot Act


By TOM TROY
BLADE STAFF WRITER


Two Toledo councilmen and a small group of citizens holding a banner were kicked out of Government Center yesterday while holding a news conference raising questions about the USA Patriot Act.

An Ohio Highway Patrol trooper held Councilman Pete Gerken’s elbow as he escorted him to the front exit of the building.

Also ordered to leave was Councilman Frank Szollosi and the group called Citizens for Individual Rights and Freedoms, whose members unfurled a banner criticizing the USA Patriot Act as "unpatriotic."

Mr. Gerken, who pulled his arm away from the trooper, said afterward that many news events have taken place in the lobby of Government Center, including one only 24 hours earlier on the subject of electric rates, in which he participated.

"This is an elected official in the building talking about an issue pending before council," Mr. Gerken said about himself. "This was not an overtly political press conference." He said he would protest to the Ohio Building Authority, which owns Government Center.

Mr. Gerken and Mr. Szollosi are co-sponsors of a council resolution condemning the Patriot Act. The law, enacted after the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, broadens federal investigative powers. Critics have said it gives investigators too much power to snoop on law-abiding citizens.

The group called the 4:30 p.m. news conference to publicize a "campaign of education and discussion" of the USA Patriot Act.

The group met in the lobby of Government Center just outside the door to council chambers, even though the announcement said the event would be held outside Government Center unless it rained.

Griff Allan, the second shift security supervisor, later told Mr. Gerken the reason he was removed was because a banner had been unfurled.

Building Manager Michael L. Sullivan also cited the banner as well as the topic as inappropriate for inside a public place.

"If they had been inside council chambers or outside the building, nothing would have happened," Mr. Sullivan said. "This is a public area. To avoid offending anyone, we say you can’t do it in a public area."

Mr. Sullivan works for the Reuben Co., which manages the building for the Ohio Building Authority. Reuben Co. employs the firm Securitas Security to guard the building. In addition, state troopers are on duty at all times.

The 22-story building houses city, county, and state offices as well as the chambers of City Council and the Lucas County commissioners.

The Gerken-Szollosi resolution has been held up, in part, because of criticism from Republicans that it is a political assault on President Bush.

Mayor Jack Ford also withheld his support.

HDPM
11-08-2003, 11:58 AM
Ridiculous quote. But the law clearly allows many ways to offend people in public places with political messages. This copuncilman could have quite a lot of fun if he gets a little legal advice and has the guts to be as offensive as possible within the confines of the law in this public place. Let's just say this: the day a neighbor tries to regulate HDPM on some little covenant or something stupid is the day the neighbors find out how far the First Amendment goes (and how much political speech is protected even in a stalinist zoning ordinance) in protecting very vulgar political speech placed on very large lighted signs with very explicit graphics. /images/graemlins/laugh.gif

adios
11-08-2003, 12:45 PM
"law enforcement and beaurocrats are just over the top and getting worse."

Your story proves that conclusively? Ridiculous. I'm not saying you're wrong necessarily but your implication that the story is proof of your assertation is actually no proof. People being unreasonable is hardly an unusual event.

brad
11-08-2003, 12:54 PM
'Your story proves that conclusively? Ridiculous. '

no that was an editorial heh. actually its the other way around, tons of news stories like that led me to the opinion.

p.s. see that story where police raided a high school and put guns to kids heads? as a parent i would immediately pull my child out of public school if that happened.

HDPM
11-09-2003, 01:24 AM
Yeah, that SC high school story is unreal. You read the quotes of the principal? I think it is probably child abuse to send your kid to school there. The principal should be fired and the cops charged with assorted crimes possibly.

Michael Davis
11-09-2003, 05:38 AM
Please have a party to kick off this event!

-Mike