Magician
08-02-2003, 01:06 PM
$30 + $3, 2 table Sit 'n Go on Pokerstars
Blinds are $75/$150, about 11 players left, the table I'm on is 5-handed.
I've got 1,700 chips making me quite short-stacked.
UTG (big stack with 6K chips) raises to 300. Folded to me in the SB. I have pocket 99.
I find his little raise suspicious and I don't know what it means. I don't think calling is right here as 225 would be a big chunk of my stack and if I'm ahead I am giving away 3 free cards. So it's either raise or fold.
He seems to be quite tight and his baby raise UTG seems to me to say two things:
a) he has a hand
b) he wants action
I think for a long time - and muck.
Was this cowardly? Should I have snapped back?
I thought that if I snapped back he would just call and then I'd have a tough decision to make on the flop.
It seemed to me the only real choices were to move in or muck.
But if I move in, I either:
a) win a small pot relative to the stack I am risking if he mucks
b) when called, I am at best a small favorite and quite easily a big dog
Blinds are $75/$150, about 11 players left, the table I'm on is 5-handed.
I've got 1,700 chips making me quite short-stacked.
UTG (big stack with 6K chips) raises to 300. Folded to me in the SB. I have pocket 99.
I find his little raise suspicious and I don't know what it means. I don't think calling is right here as 225 would be a big chunk of my stack and if I'm ahead I am giving away 3 free cards. So it's either raise or fold.
He seems to be quite tight and his baby raise UTG seems to me to say two things:
a) he has a hand
b) he wants action
I think for a long time - and muck.
Was this cowardly? Should I have snapped back?
I thought that if I snapped back he would just call and then I'd have a tough decision to make on the flop.
It seemed to me the only real choices were to move in or muck.
But if I move in, I either:
a) win a small pot relative to the stack I am risking if he mucks
b) when called, I am at best a small favorite and quite easily a big dog