All this time people were telling me Party was the fishiest site...

[KSOT]

But after playing on Paradise and Pacific this week, I think I can safely say that the players on both are far worse. $1/$2 on Paradise feels like $0.02/$0.04 on Stars.

Is this already well documented?

[jman220]

[ QUOTE ]
But after playing on Paradise and Pacific this week, I think I can safely say that the players on both are far worse. $1/$2 on Paradise feels like $0.02/$0.04 on Stars.

Is this already well documented?

[/ QUOTE ]

It is well documented that Pacific is fishier. However, you can only play 1 table, and it is buggy as hell. I'll oftentimes run 1 table of pacific while multitabling another site however.

[MrBlueNose]

Meh. Party and Pacific are pretty fishy, but definetely not the fishiest site on the net.

[KSOT]

Well, with what little experience I have, I thought Paradise was even worse than both. But please do enlighten me, which sites are worse (better)?

[jman220]

[ QUOTE ]
Meh. Party and Pacific are pretty fishy, but definetely not the fishiest site on the net.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course, it depends on what stakes you're talking about. There are some small poker rooms tied to casinos that at times have very fish low limit games. but for mid-high sh?

I think for mid poker, pacific is probably the best site. However everything else about them sucks. Including keeping the games secure and honest. which is why I don't play there.

[Reef]

pacific software is HORRIBLE. Paradise is meh