HDPM
07-29-2003, 12:32 PM
We all knew the guy was basically an idiot. But check this out. web page (http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2003/Jul-29-Tue-2003/business/21825198.html)
Now, I sympathize with him to some degree in that casino customers should enjoy a certain level of privacy protection by the casino. But there isn't exactly a pit boss/gambler privilege. I think it is in bad form to publicize people's gambling results, and would fire any employeee who publicized that kind of stuff if I ran a casino. (Yes, Razzo has crossed the line on RGP, and I think Linda G has too.) Nevertheless, gambling by law has to be PUBLIC in Nevada. (some recent exceptions) The currency reporting requirements brought to us in part by the war on drugs idiots (who might they be?) also make financial goings on less private. And hasn't Bennet railed against privacy rights in Roe v. Wade? This guy is a joke.
Now, I sympathize with him to some degree in that casino customers should enjoy a certain level of privacy protection by the casino. But there isn't exactly a pit boss/gambler privilege. I think it is in bad form to publicize people's gambling results, and would fire any employeee who publicized that kind of stuff if I ran a casino. (Yes, Razzo has crossed the line on RGP, and I think Linda G has too.) Nevertheless, gambling by law has to be PUBLIC in Nevada. (some recent exceptions) The currency reporting requirements brought to us in part by the war on drugs idiots (who might they be?) also make financial goings on less private. And hasn't Bennet railed against privacy rights in Roe v. Wade? This guy is a joke.