PDA

View Full Version : Ned Beatty'ed Again!!!


SirFoldsAlot
07-29-2003, 09:50 AM
I couldn't play this any more aggressively, Anybody play this differently? This was the start of my worst SNG night ever.


***** Hand History for Game 117031654 *****
50/100 TourneyTexasHTGameTable (Limit) (Tournament 626910) - Mon Jul 28 20:25:01 EDT 2003
Table Card Room Table 1384 (Real Money) -- Seat 10 is the button
Total number of players : 10
Seat 1: Player 1(920)
Seat 2: Player 2 (800)
Seat 3: ME (655)
Seat 4: Player 4 (905)
Seat 5: Player 5 (215)
Seat 6: Player 6 (680)
Seat 7: RIVER RAT (915)
Seat 8: Player 8 (1030)
Seat 9: Player 9 (410)
Seat 10: Player 10 (1470)
Player 1 posts small blind (25)
Player 2 posts big blind (50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to ME [ Kd, Kc ]
ME raises (100) to 100
Player 4 folds.
Player 5 raises (150) to 150
Player 6 folds.
RIVER RAT calls (150)
Player 8 folds.
Player 9 folds.
Player 10 calls (150)
Player 1folds.
Player 2 folds.
ME raises (100) to 200
Player 5 calls (50)
RIVER RAT calls (50)
Player 10 calls (50)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 5h, 7s, 2d ]
ME bets (50)
Player 5 calls (15)
Player 5 calls all-In.
RIVER RAT calls (50)
Player 10 calls (50)
Creating Main Pot with $935 with Player 5
** Dealing Turn ** : [ 8s ]
ME bets (100)
RIVER RAT raises (200) to 200
Player 10 calls (200)
ME raises (200) to 300
RIVER RAT calls (100)
Player 10 calls (100)
** Dealing River ** : [ 9c ]
ME checks.
RIVER RAT checks.
Player 10 bets (100)
ME bets (105)
ME calls all-In.
RIVER RAT calls (105)
Player 10 calls (5)
Creating Side Pot 1 with $1320 with ME
** Summary **
Main Pot: 935 | Side Pot 1: 1320 |
Board: [ 5h 7s 2d 8s 9c ]
Player 1balance 895, lost 25 (folded)
Player 2 balance 750, lost 50 (folded)
ME balance 0, lost 655 [ Kd Kc ] [ a pair of kings -- Kd,Kc,9c,8s,7s ]
Player 4 balance 905, didn't bet (folded)
Player 5 balance 0, lost 215 [ Qh Ac ] [ high card ace -- Ac,Qh,9c,8s,7s ]
Player 6 balance 680, didn't bet (folded)
RIVER RAT balance 2515, bet 655, collected 2255, net +1600 [ 9d 5d ] [ two pairs, nines and fives -- 9d,9c,8s,5d,5h ]
Player 8 balance 1030, didn't bet (folded)
Player 9 balance 410, didn't bet (folded)
Player 10 balance 815, lost 655 [ Qc 5c ] [ a pair of fives -- Qc,9c,8s,5c,5h ]
Player 5 finished in tenth place
ME finished in ninth place

hutz
07-29-2003, 10:09 AM
I couldn't play this any more aggressively

I couldn't disagree more. You only raised a touch more than what's in the pot ($100 raise v. $75 total blinds). You invited loose cold-callers and pretty much got what you wanted. You then bet $50 on the flop into a large pot on a fairly coordinated board. You did not play this aggressively, IMHO.

Anybody play this differently?

Yes. In addition to my comments above, I'll say that (given the small raise you made to open the hand) you should have pushed all-in when it came back around to you pre-flop. As you can tell, I'm not giving you a lot of sympathy on this hand.

By the way, posting hand histories rather than putting a hand into narrative format isn't a good way to generate a lot of replies. It is difficult to read and not very user-friendly.

SirFoldsAlot
07-29-2003, 10:21 AM
Sorry, this was a limit tourney so I couldn't go all-in.

SirFoldsAlot
07-29-2003, 10:37 AM
50/100 TourneyTexasHTGameTable (Limit) (Tournament 626910) -
Seat 1: Player 1(920)
Seat 2: Player 2 (800)
Seat 3: ME (655)
Seat 4: Player 4 (905)
Seat 5: Player 5 (215)
Seat 6: Player 6 (680)
Seat 7: RIVER RAT (915)
Seat 8: Player 8 (1030)
Seat 9: Player 9 (410)
Seat 10: Player 10 (1470)
Player 1 posts small blind (25)
Player 2 posts big blind (50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to ME [ K /images/graemlins/diamond.gif, K /images/graemlins/club.gif ]
ME raises (100) to 100
Player 5 raises (150) to 150
RIVER RAT calls (150)
Player 10 calls (150)
ME raises (100) to 200
Player 5 calls (50)
RIVER RAT calls (50)
Player 10 calls (50)
** Dealing Flop ** : [ 5 /images/graemlins/heart.gif, 7 /images/graemlins/spade.gif, 2 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif ]
ME bets (50)
Player 5 calls (15)
Player 5 calls all-In.
RIVER RAT calls (50)
Player 10 calls (50)

** Dealing Turn ** : [ 8 /images/graemlins/spade.gif ]
ME bets (100)
RIVER RAT raises (200) to 200
Player 10 calls (200)
ME raises (200) to 300
RIVER RAT calls (100)
Player 10 calls (100)
** Dealing River ** : [ 9 /images/graemlins/club.gif ]
ME checks.
RIVER RAT checks.
Player 10 bets (100)
ME bets (105)
ME calls all-In.
RIVER RAT calls (105)
Player 10 calls (5)

** Summary **

Board: [ 5 /images/graemlins/heart.gif 7 /images/graemlins/spade.gif 2 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif 8 /images/graemlins/spade.gif 9 /images/graemlins/club.gif ]

ME balance 0, lost 655 [ K /images/graemlins/diamond.gif K /images/graemlins/club.gif ] [ a pair of kings -- Kd,Kc,9c,8s,7s ]

Player 5 balance 0, lost 215 [ Q /images/graemlins/heart.gif A /images/graemlins/club.gif ] [ high card ace -- Ac,Qh,9c,8s,7s ]

RIVER RAT balance 2515, bet 655, collected 2255, net +1600 [ 9 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif 5 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif ] [ two pairs, nines and fives -- 9d,9c,8s,5d,5h ]

Player 10 balance 815, lost 655 [ Q /images/graemlins/club.gif 5 /images/graemlins/club.gif ] [ a pair of fives -- Qc,9c,8s,5c,5h ]

hutz
07-29-2003, 12:57 PM
Sorry for the confusion. I didn't realize it was a limit tournament until you pointed it out. Again, that is primarily a function of the form in which you posted the hand. Given it was a limit tournament, it looks like the only thing you might have changed would have been to check-raise the flop. With the board being coordinated, I'm not sure risking the free card would have been the best of moves. So, in short, I think that was just a situation where you were destined to lose.

By the way, not to pick on you too much, simply adding suits to a copied/pasted hand history doesn't do much for you. Look at the way Clarkmeister, vehn_, and others post their hands in the middle and low limit forums if you want a guideline for how to post a hand so it's easier to read.