PDA

View Full Version : Poker Stars vs. Party Poker

12-18-2005, 12:42 AM
hey guys, i just wondered if anyone knows of a post or a thorough debate of Party Poker vs. Poker Stars.
Maulik
12-18-2005, 12:44 AM
PokerStars = better software
PartyPoker = rock garden.
DeadMoneyOC
12-18-2005, 12:45 AM
*
Melchiades
12-18-2005, 01:19 AM
If you're good, go to Party, else come to Pokerstars. Thats the smart moves.
Hendricks433
12-18-2005, 01:21 AM
Use the search function. Also you might want to try both out and see how you like both and pick one.
KingDan
12-18-2005, 01:27 AM
It may be a combination of running good and sample size but I thought the turbos have a ton of fish.

The 110 6max is very good IMO... but you have to play postflop occasionally which a lot of people here hate.
Melchiades
12-18-2005, 01:28 AM
[ QUOTE ]
.. but you have to play postflop occasionally which a lot of people here hate.

[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah. [censored] that.
Hendricks433
12-18-2005, 02:41 AM
lol. Second that. Ring games are for Post Flop /images/graemlins/grin.gif
12-18-2005, 02:46 AM
[ QUOTE ]

PartyPoker = rock garden.

[/ QUOTE ]

Was I the only one confused by this?

OP: PP normal SNG's take half as long as stars normal tourneys. Stars normal tourneys and PP SNG's are similar.
bawcerelli
12-18-2005, 06:21 AM
[ QUOTE ]
OP: PP normal SNG's take half as long as stars normal tourneys. Stars normal tourneys and PP SNG's are similar.

[/ QUOTE ]

was i the only one confused about this lol

OP: he meant stars turbo's and PP's regular tourneys are similar.