View Full Version : [!@#$%]
Mat Sklansky
12-16-2005, 04:43 PM
has replaced [censored]. Any objections or better ideas?
[censored]
12-16-2005, 04:57 PM
[ QUOTE ]
has replaced [censored]. Any objections or better ideas?
[/ QUOTE ]
Well I don't know the guy and this does come as a shock but if this is what you think is best than I guess it should happen.
excuse my while I go cry in the shower now
Mat Sklansky
12-16-2005, 05:02 PM
[censored] go [!@#$%] yourself.
Somehow that looks better to me, but I can easily change it
astroglide
12-16-2005, 05:26 PM
i like [censored] better
FeliciaLee
12-16-2005, 05:30 PM
How about [Felicia]?
What a tribute to the most hated person! /images/graemlins/wink.gif
timprov
12-16-2005, 05:49 PM
I like [bad word] and [very bad word] a la the tyrannosaur thread in B&M. linky (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Board=cardroom&Number=4046536&S earchpage=1&Main=4046536&Words=tyrannosaur&topic=& Search=true#Post4046536)
PoBoy321
12-16-2005, 05:56 PM
I just noticed that in a post made in the politics forum. Why not just makes it [XXXXXX]? [!@#$%] just looks so unprofessional, IMHO.
Mat Sklansky
12-16-2005, 05:58 PM
We have five differences of opinion. We need at least a couple people to agree, then I'll change it.
FeliciaLee
12-16-2005, 06:01 PM
Um, mine was just a joke, I hope you know.
I like [censored] best, to be serious.
[ QUOTE ]
We have five differences of opinion. We need at least a couple people to agree, then I'll change it.
[/ QUOTE ]
PoBoy321
12-16-2005, 06:03 PM
Yeah, leaving it at [censored] was fine by me.
MrWookie47
12-16-2005, 06:08 PM
[ QUOTE ]
We have five differences of opinion. We need at least a couple people to agree, then I'll change it.
[/ QUOTE ]
Put me down as a vote for [censored]. Primarily because I like to refer to him by typing just four choice letters. And because !@#$ looks too cartoony.
xorbie
12-16-2005, 06:15 PM
i think [censored] is the best.
Mat Sklansky
12-16-2005, 06:19 PM
[censored] i can't even [censored] [censored] make [censored] [censored] changes. [censored] well, [censored] [censored] [censored] [censored]
mat
AngryCola
12-16-2005, 06:20 PM
Either seems fine to me. But usually when something like !@#$% is used to replace a word the number of characters matches the word that is being censored.
That's not the case with [censored], so it has my vote.
B Dids
12-16-2005, 06:38 PM
I like !@#$% but not [!@#$%]
I like it just 'cause it seems old time commicy, but then I can see why people wouldn't.
Or we could just replace all profanity with random text strings like "shimmering egg princess".
[censored]
12-16-2005, 07:00 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[censored] i can't even [censored] [censored] make [censored] [censored] changes. [censored] well, [censored] [censored] [censored] [censored]
mat
[/ QUOTE ]
YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
thanks for your vote of confidence guys & felicia
bicyclekick
12-16-2005, 07:24 PM
[censored] imo.
stabn
12-16-2005, 07:53 PM
[censored] [!@#$%] i like [censored] too.
Schneids
12-16-2005, 11:22 PM
what the [censored] is Cola an author of?
Keep it as [censored].
durron597
12-17-2005, 12:39 AM
test, [censored]
B Dids
12-17-2005, 05:45 PM
A is for [censored] admin not author [censored]
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.