PDA

View Full Version : [!@#$%]


Mat Sklansky
12-16-2005, 04:43 PM
has replaced [censored]. Any objections or better ideas?

[censored]
12-16-2005, 04:57 PM
[ QUOTE ]
has replaced [censored]. Any objections or better ideas?

[/ QUOTE ]

Well I don't know the guy and this does come as a shock but if this is what you think is best than I guess it should happen.

excuse my while I go cry in the shower now

Mat Sklansky
12-16-2005, 05:02 PM
[censored] go [!@#$%] yourself.

Somehow that looks better to me, but I can easily change it

astroglide
12-16-2005, 05:26 PM
i like [censored] better

FeliciaLee
12-16-2005, 05:30 PM
How about [Felicia]?

What a tribute to the most hated person! /images/graemlins/wink.gif

timprov
12-16-2005, 05:49 PM
I like [bad word] and [very bad word] a la the tyrannosaur thread in B&M. linky (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Board=cardroom&Number=4046536&S earchpage=1&Main=4046536&Words=tyrannosaur&topic=& Search=true#Post4046536)

PoBoy321
12-16-2005, 05:56 PM
I just noticed that in a post made in the politics forum. Why not just makes it [XXXXXX]? [!@#$%] just looks so unprofessional, IMHO.

Mat Sklansky
12-16-2005, 05:58 PM
We have five differences of opinion. We need at least a couple people to agree, then I'll change it.

FeliciaLee
12-16-2005, 06:01 PM
Um, mine was just a joke, I hope you know.

I like [censored] best, to be serious.

[ QUOTE ]
We have five differences of opinion. We need at least a couple people to agree, then I'll change it.

[/ QUOTE ]

PoBoy321
12-16-2005, 06:03 PM
Yeah, leaving it at [censored] was fine by me.

MrWookie47
12-16-2005, 06:08 PM
[ QUOTE ]
We have five differences of opinion. We need at least a couple people to agree, then I'll change it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Put me down as a vote for [censored]. Primarily because I like to refer to him by typing just four choice letters. And because !@#$ looks too cartoony.

xorbie
12-16-2005, 06:15 PM
i think [censored] is the best.

Mat Sklansky
12-16-2005, 06:19 PM
[censored] i can't even [censored] [censored] make [censored] [censored] changes. [censored] well, [censored] [censored] [censored] [censored]

mat

AngryCola
12-16-2005, 06:20 PM
Either seems fine to me. But usually when something like !@#$% is used to replace a word the number of characters matches the word that is being censored.

That's not the case with [censored], so it has my vote.

B Dids
12-16-2005, 06:38 PM
I like !@#$% but not [!@#$%]

I like it just 'cause it seems old time commicy, but then I can see why people wouldn't.

Or we could just replace all profanity with random text strings like "shimmering egg princess".

[censored]
12-16-2005, 07:00 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[censored] i can't even [censored] [censored] make [censored] [censored] changes. [censored] well, [censored] [censored] [censored] [censored]

mat

[/ QUOTE ]

YES!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

thanks for your vote of confidence guys & felicia

bicyclekick
12-16-2005, 07:24 PM
[censored] imo.

stabn
12-16-2005, 07:53 PM
[censored] [!@#$%] i like [censored] too.

Schneids
12-16-2005, 11:22 PM
what the [censored] is Cola an author of?

Keep it as [censored].

durron597
12-17-2005, 12:39 AM
test, [censored]

B Dids
12-17-2005, 05:45 PM
A is for [censored] admin not author [censored]