PDA

View Full Version : ($60) Irieguy implied this push should be automatic...


durron597
12-14-2005, 12:08 AM
... in his reply to my post in the thread about Custer's T2 hand. So is it that automatic?

Reads: Button is extremely tight. SB and BB both seem aggro first in but not facing a raise (i.e. decent). SB in particular was very tight early and then loosened up a ton level 4.

PokerStars No-Limit Hold'em Tourney, Big Blind is t400 (5 handed) pokerhand.org hand converter (http://www.pokerhand.org)

SB (t2470)
BB (t2375)
UTG (t3470)
Hero (t2505)
Button (t2680)

Preflop: Hero is MP with 5/images/graemlins/heart.gif, 6/images/graemlins/heart.gif.
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to t2480</font>,

11t
12-14-2005, 12:10 AM
Yah I push here the majority of the time. You are playing for first and tryiing to accumulate chips at this point. You need chips badly and going thru the blinds again without getting a pot is gonna hurt you.

Roman
12-14-2005, 12:13 AM
looks good

durron597
12-14-2005, 12:23 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Yah I push here the majority of the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

When wouldn't you?

Daliman
12-14-2005, 12:29 AM
With your reads, I agree, unless you have LAG image. Then maybe 50/50 random.

1C5
12-14-2005, 12:30 AM
Hmmm, this push depends on the opponents for me. It is no way automatic.

durron597
12-14-2005, 12:35 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Hmmm, this push depends on the opponents for me. It is no way automatic.

[/ QUOTE ]

Unknown typical $60 opponents?

1C5
12-14-2005, 12:41 AM
Decent players, will push. Any maniacs left to act and I muck forsure.

durron597
12-14-2005, 01:02 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Decent players, will push. Any maniacs left to act and I muck forsure.

[/ QUOTE ]

After I pushed this, I ran it through SnGPT. Even against a maniac call range from both blinds this is still marginally +EV.

1C5
12-14-2005, 01:04 AM
Good to know...

ilya
12-14-2005, 01:07 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Decent players, will push. Any maniacs left to act and I muck forsure.

[/ QUOTE ]

After I pushed this, I ran it through SnGPT. Even against a maniac call range from both blinds this is still marginally +EV.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wha? I'm getting -1.2 for Tight button, Maniac SB&amp;BB, 50% BB adjustment.

durron597
12-14-2005, 01:09 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Decent players, will push. Any maniacs left to act and I muck forsure.

[/ QUOTE ]

After I pushed this, I ran it through SnGPT. Even against a maniac call range from both blinds this is still marginally +EV.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wha? I'm getting -1.2 for Tight button, Maniac SB&amp;BB, 50% BB adjustment.

[/ QUOTE ]

I got +0.4%... LOL I had the wrong payout structure (I had pokerstars DSO final table hehehe) OK, Loose SB/BB, Average button this is +0.3%, that makes a lot more sense.

ilya
12-14-2005, 01:11 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Decent players, will push. Any maniacs left to act and I muck forsure.

[/ QUOTE ]

After I pushed this, I ran it through SnGPT. Even against a maniac call range from both blinds this is still marginally +EV.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wha? I'm getting -1.2 for Tight button, Maniac SB&amp;BB, 50% BB adjustment.

[/ QUOTE ]

I got +0.4%... LOL I had the wrong payout structure (I had pokerstars DSO final table hehehe) OK, Loose SB/BB, Average button this is +0.3%, that makes a lot more sense.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ah sorry I ran it under Party structure. It'd be -0.2 on Party with those settings.

p.s. T2o would be -0.9 /images/graemlins/tongue.gif