PDA

View Full Version : tracking bet365 raked hands


phillydilly
12-13-2005, 08:04 PM
is there an easy way to track this so i know when to email support after my 500?


edit: um yeah, nevermind,

12-14-2005, 05:49 PM
The tracker in the software doesn't keep track of the hands required for the monthly bonus. For this, you could email support and they will tell you how many hands you've played and how much they've deposited in your account.

naschburger2
12-15-2005, 03:18 AM
You are incorrect. If you only play on tables that qualify for the bonus then all you have to do is check the hands for the bet365 30,000 monthly freeroll and it will be totally accurate. This is found under raked hands in the menu.

KKbluff
12-15-2005, 03:33 AM
[ QUOTE ]
You are incorrect. If you only play on tables that qualify for the bonus then all you have to do is check the hands for the bet365 30,000 monthly freeroll and it will be totally accurate. This is found under raked hands in the menu.

[/ QUOTE ]

What about the raked hands that "dont qualify" that actually DO "qualify" ?
Have you been keeping up to date on the threads previously posted here? *use the search function*

(correct me if im wrong, but I think I dont think I am)

12-15-2005, 08:57 AM
[ QUOTE ]
You are incorrect. If you only play on tables that qualify for the bonus then all you have to do is check the hands for the bet365 30,000 monthly freeroll and it will be totally accurate. This is found under raked hands in the menu.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, this is true. However, this counter also counts hands that don't qualify for the monthly bonus.

POKhER
12-15-2005, 09:03 AM
raked hand .25cent right? filter PA using "Raked hands .25" cent on the game notes page no?

12-15-2005, 12:13 PM
[ QUOTE ]
raked hand .25cent right? filter PA using "Raked hands .25" cent on the game notes page no?

[/ QUOTE ]

The Raked Hands menu counts a raked hand as any hand that was raked 25 cents. The bonus requires the hands to have been played at 1-2 Fixed Limit or higher, so the Raked Hands menu is obviously ineffective for this.

Your idea should work if you filter for $1.