12-06-2005, 02:44 PM
A while back I questioned why I was not able to re-raise when a short stack went all in and I was correctly informed that it was because the short stack was less than the size of the bet. I wondered how I could have missed this and found the following exerpt from an internet site that was ranking poker sites.
[ QUOTE ]
Party's software is a big step down. Party allows you to reraise an all-in "under-raise". (In poker, if the all-in player's raise is less than the size of the bet, the bettor is not allowed to reraise. On Party he is, which is a terrible rule.) If good software is what you want, Party is not the place to get it.
[/ QUOTE ]
I was curious how I could have overlooked this so I was wondering was this a recent rule change or is the site administrator incorrect in his observation as I was?
[ QUOTE ]
Party's software is a big step down. Party allows you to reraise an all-in "under-raise". (In poker, if the all-in player's raise is less than the size of the bet, the bettor is not allowed to reraise. On Party he is, which is a terrible rule.) If good software is what you want, Party is not the place to get it.
[/ QUOTE ]
I was curious how I could have overlooked this so I was wondering was this a recent rule change or is the site administrator incorrect in his observation as I was?