PDA

View Full Version : Win %

mtgordon
12-04-2005, 08:27 PM
I was wondering what people's overall Win % are for full ring limit games. I have a win% of 9.3% through my last 31k hands while my friend is 8.5% through 25k hands.

Does it makes sense that the higher limit you are playing the higher your win % should be? The reasoning behind that being that at lower limits people will try to draw out on you more.
cnfuzzd
12-04-2005, 08:40 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I was wondering what people's overall Win % are for full ring limit games. I have a win% of 9.3% through my last 31k hands while my friend is 8.5% through 25k hands.

Does it makes sense that the higher limit you are playing the higher your win % should be? The reasoning behind that being that at lower limits people will try to draw out on you more.

[/ QUOTE ]

i am totallyh done with win percentages....

peace

john nickle
smartalecc5
12-04-2005, 08:47 PM
Heh
BigBiceps
12-04-2005, 09:25 PM
limit, 45k hands, win:10.6%, 22/13/1.8
no-limit, 55k hands, win: 10.6%, 22/12/2.4

Was an interesting exercise.
mtgordon
12-04-2005, 09:37 PM
Are the limit hands full ring? I just expected that the win % would be less than 10% but maybe that was just incorrect thinking.
Davey
12-04-2005, 09:43 PM
20,641 hands. Full ring. 7.34% I suck.
BigBiceps
12-04-2005, 10:11 PM
It is full ring, until people start dropping out.
There are also about 500 hands of heads-up which probably messes up the data a little.

However average players is around 9 in both data sets.
BigBiceps
12-04-2005, 10:16 PM
Also, my win% is going to be a bit higher since 2/3rds of the games were on UB and FT which have tighter games than some of the other servers, and I do a bit more pot stealing than usual.
ncboiler
12-04-2005, 11:08 PM
9.3% seems pretty high but your sample size is small. 9.3 even seems fishy high.
ncboiler
12-04-2005, 11:11 PM
[ QUOTE ]
20,641 hands. Full ring. 7.34% I suck.

[/ QUOTE ]

I wouldn't expect a winning player to be much higher than that given a big enough sample size.
mtgordon
12-05-2005, 12:32 AM
You could be 100% correct, but I was wondering if you have any data to back that up.
timprov
12-05-2005, 01:07 AM
I tend to run about 9% at full ring as well. At 7.34% you probably need to seek out Nate's you play too tight post.
mtgordon
12-05-2005, 01:42 PM
What kind of a sample size are you looking at? I was definitely guessing it would be around 9% vs. 7%, but with so few hands I certainly can't say.