PDA

View Full Version : Final hand. A fun one.


Entity
12-03-2005, 07:51 AM
Live 10/20. At this point in the session, the worst hand I have shown down is AJ UI that I raised after limpers. I've being doing my fair share of isoraising but getting away with it. My image is very likely that of a solid player who tends to be very aggressive postflop, but almost entirely with reason.

Limper #1 limps. He's bad, passive, readable. Limps with any two connected, one gappers probably 86o and above, any broadway, raises decent broadway and good aces. Raises good pairs 99+.

Limper #2, a horrible 60/25/1 LAG, limps as well.

I raise A/images/graemlins/heart.gifT/images/graemlins/heart.gif in the CO with a 2+2er OTB. 2+2er folds and the SB folds. BB, a calling-stationish player, calls. He's probably 50/5/.5. Limper #1 calls, now LAG limp-reraises. I make it 4-bets, and everyone calls. 4 to the flop, 16.5SB.

The flop is K/images/graemlins/heart.gif7/images/graemlins/club.gif9/images/graemlins/spade.gif. Checked to me and I bet. Everyone calls.

The turn is the 8/images/graemlins/heart.gif. Checked to me. I bet.

private joker
12-03-2005, 08:06 AM
PF I might just call the limp-reraise. He's a LAG, but are you sure you're not dominated by a better ace?

I might take the free card on the flop if you think there's a decent chance of getting checkraised. You might still have the best hand, but you don't want to get too involved until you're sure.

The turn bet is mucho obvious. OESD + nut flush draw + overcard = value bet. Who cares if you get checkraised; you have 15 outs to a probable winner.

goofball
12-03-2005, 08:18 AM
Unless you've seen him LRR with crap before I've noticed even lags tend to have something when they LRR (side note: I isoraised this guy at the wynn with a huge range for about 2 days until he finally got sick of it and limp reraised me with 99)

Anyway, I tend to give at least some respect to teh limp reraise and ATs isn't that good anyway.

I would check behind on the flop. YOu don't really have a hand, you're in a pot iwth lots of people any of whom could be planning a checkraise and I don't want to have to fold without seeing the turn.

Of coures you bet the turn.

DeathDonkey
12-03-2005, 09:15 AM
This is super duper standard all the way through. Post these in micro dude.

-DeathDonkey

jason_t
12-03-2005, 09:16 AM
Standard.

bernie
12-03-2005, 10:01 AM
[ QUOTE ]
My image is very likely that of a solid player who tends to be very aggressive postflop, but almost entirely with reason.


[/ QUOTE ]

This assumes your opponents are capable of identifying a solid player and reasonable aggression. Many times the aggression will look overboard to them. Reasonable to them is what they themselves are capable of doing. Just a thought.

I'd have checked the flop, raised the turn if bet into other wise bet the turn if checked to.

b

Lurker4
12-03-2005, 11:41 AM
PF I think is good if the LAG is one of those random LAGs that will LRR all kinds of stuff here. You might get BB/Limper1 to fold (unlikely) but if not you likely have more than your fair share of equity and you're in position. I check the flop and I don't think it's very close; it's a huge pot and no one is folding any semblance of a made hand, draw, A high, whatever. Betting may get you a free turn card if/when you turn one of several of your backdoor draws but I think that's mitigated by the fact that you may get c/r'ed in one or more spots here and you have to call the c/r. Turn bet is good 4-way w/your 15+ outs/very high pot equity.

krishanleong
12-03-2005, 01:04 PM
To everyone who likes the turn bet...

Do we think we have the best hand? If so what %?

What are the chances of being check raised? What are the chances of winning the pot with a turn bet.

Here are my answers.

1. I don't think we are ahead here more than 2% of the time. Too many calling stations with a couple cards in the playing zone.

2. I don't think we take it down with a turn bet very often at all. I think most of the time, some sort of pair calls us and we have to rely on our outs. (I think we have 9 flush outs, 4 straight outs discounted because it's a one card straight and potentially a split out, and 1.5 outs for the aces - total 14.5 outs which is about 31%ish equity?)

So if we are getting called most of the time, what % are we going to get check raised? Well your image is good so you will be check raised less. But the flop is really bad since a K high uncoordinated board where you get 4 callers makes it very likely that you are up against a pair and somewhat likely that you are up against a K. There is always a chance someone is slowplaying kings up or a set. People always say it's not a bad thing if the turn goes bezerk when you have such a good draw but I'm sure the EV is less compared to checking the turn given the opportunity. One more point in favor of not worrying about a check raise is the most likely player to check raise is the LAG on your right. A check raise by him will do the least damage as the callers in between will be trapped.

Conclusion? I don't think the turn is a clear cut bet. With two cards to come I think it would be hard to argue with an open-ended straight flush draw but on the turn against 3 opponents that called a flop bet on a king high uncoordinated board, I think you have to at least call it sorta close. /images/graemlins/smile.gif

If you told me the calling stations would call the turn 90% of the time or that they would fold anything but kings to a turn bet, or that people routinely call the flop with 2 uncoordinated undercards I would say it's an easy bet too.

Krishan

krishanleong
12-03-2005, 01:12 PM
Another way to think about it.

For everytime you bet, do you get 2 or 3 callers as often as you get 1 caller?

For everytime you get check raised, do you get 2-3 people seeing the river as often as you get 1?

Yeah, still seems like an easy bet. Just too much equity with 1/3rd of the deck on your side.

So basically the only time a turn bet is bad is when you only get 1 caller or you get checkraised and it's heads up. I'm convinced these scenrios are in the minority.

Thanks for staying with my rambling.

Krishan

QTip
12-03-2005, 01:13 PM
[ QUOTE ]
raised the turn if bet into

[/ QUOTE ]

I would like you to clarify this please.

I think there are a lot of situations (much more often than not) where raising the turn here would be incorrect, and quite possibly a large mistake.

QTip
12-03-2005, 01:19 PM
Entity:

I'd like to hear why you like your flop bet here better than you liked my flop bet in the hand we discussed in the SS forum a couple days ago.

Edit:

For those not familiar, this was the flop bet Entity and I discussed.

Preflop: Hero is CO with J /images/graemlins/spade.gif, Q /images/graemlins/spade.gif.
1 fold, UTG+1 calls, MP1 calls, 2 folds, Hero raises, 1 fold, SB calls, BB calls, UTG+1 calls, MP1 calls.

Flop: (10 SB) 4 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif, T /images/graemlins/spade.gif, 4 /images/graemlins/club.gif (5 players)
SB checks, BB checks, UTG+1 checks, MP1 checks, Hero bets

Would just like to discuss differences that make one flop bet better than the other here.

QTip
12-03-2005, 01:43 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Another way to think about it.

For everytime you bet, do you get 2 or 3 callers as often as you get 1 caller?

For everytime you get check raised, do you get 2-3 people seeing the river as often as you get 1?

Yeah, still seems like an easy bet. Just too much equity with 1/3rd of the deck on your side.

So basically the only time a turn bet is bad is when you only get 1 caller or you get checkraised and it's heads up. I'm convinced these scenrios are in the minority.

Thanks for staying with my rambling.

Krishan

[/ QUOTE ]

This isn't all true, but close. It's dependent on what your opponents have. There is value with more than 1 opponent calling or even raising depending on what your opponents have. If one of them have something like a set, you're getting the worst of it.

This is why I do not like a raise in many scenarios on the turn here. It eliminates a lot of the scenarios we need to make putting money in on the turn here +EV. This, of course, depends on the % of time the bettor (and everyone behind us) will fold since it really is a semi-bluff.

Entity
12-03-2005, 03:31 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Entity:

I'd like to hear why you like your flop bet here better than you liked my flop bet in the hand we discussed in the SS forum a couple days ago.

Edit:

For those not familiar, this was the flop bet Entity and I discussed.

Preflop: Hero is CO with J /images/graemlins/spade.gif, Q /images/graemlins/spade.gif.
1 fold, UTG+1 calls, MP1 calls, 2 folds, Hero raises, 1 fold, SB calls, BB calls, UTG+1 calls, MP1 calls.

Flop: (10 SB) 4 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif, T /images/graemlins/spade.gif, 4 /images/graemlins/club.gif (5 players)
SB checks, BB checks, UTG+1 checks, MP1 checks, Hero bets

Would just like to discuss differences that make one flop bet better than the other here.


[/ QUOTE ]

I've got the best hand against 2 horrible limper/coldcallers on this flop a fair amount of the time (yes, they often have draws), and I've got a crapload of initiative after a preflop cap on a K-high board. You're in an online game where no one trusts anyone, you've got Q-high and you don't get any chance to figure out what to have when they call or when they raise, and Q-high isn't winning you UI at showdown.

Rob

12-03-2005, 03:37 PM
If your opponents weren't such passive [censored] (your LAG has an AF of 1.0?) I don't think I'd continuation bet this flop. Luckily for you, your opponents are passive [censored].

Edit: What a wierd word to censor out.

Entity
12-03-2005, 03:57 PM
[ QUOTE ]
If your opponents weren't such passive [censored] (your LAG has an AF of 1.0?) I don't think I'd continuation bet this flop. Luckily for you, your opponents are passive [censored].

Edit: What a wierd word to censor out.

[/ QUOTE ]

An AF of 1 is pretty high (obviously this is live so it's just a guess and a notation to help PT-centered people) but he's a donkbettor with any pair and any draw very frequently. I've seen him go 4 bets on the flop against a preflop 3-bettor with Q7o on a QT4 board.

Rob

Entity
12-03-2005, 04:01 PM
[ QUOTE ]
PF I might just call the limp-reraise. He's a LAG, but are you sure you're not dominated by a better ace?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes. He's raised A5o in EP on multiple occasions. This isn't just any old LRR, either. It's an overlimp-reraise. My favorite.

Rob

QTip
12-03-2005, 04:14 PM
lol....nice.

I think that'll do it /images/graemlins/smile.gif