PDA

View Full Version : OOT Risk 3

Dynasty
11-30-2005, 04:38 AM
Players: Dynasty, chuddo, RiverTheNuts, behemoth2006 (WarMaster), and Vavavoom

I'll link the game map for whoever wants to follow along as soon as the game starts.

http://warfish.net/war/images/maps/75056450/1133340113.png
RiverTheNuts
11-30-2005, 04:40 AM
according to me we're waiting on behemoth
11-30-2005, 04:42 AM
um, Im here, but it says warmaster... lame

and I cant see the map
Vavavoom
11-30-2005, 04:46 AM
why am i being picked on....

/images/graemlins/confused.gif
Stuey
11-30-2005, 05:03 AM
[ QUOTE ]
why am i being picked on....

/images/graemlins/confused.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

Because you are spread out on the board like a 5cent whore. /images/graemlins/blush.gif
Dynasty
11-30-2005, 05:03 AM
The quality of play is not high. But, we've got a couple beginners who are learning the most basic parts of the game.
chuddo
11-30-2005, 05:04 AM
i am just feigning weakness and complete strategic ineptitude.

southern africa will prevail.
11-30-2005, 05:12 AM
I love australia
Piiop
11-30-2005, 05:17 AM
Dynasty has to win it. Very good startingsetup.
11-30-2005, 05:26 AM
yeah, plus I just noobed myself by leaving myself open to both river and dynasty... shoulda bided my time longer
Dynasty
11-30-2005, 06:16 AM
Victory!
11-30-2005, 06:17 AM
grrrrrr.

Im kinda glad I lasted the longest, but with my setup I really should have been more competition, I will learn this game.
Vavavoom
11-30-2005, 06:35 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Victory!

[/ QUOTE ]

Emphatic !
chuddo
11-30-2005, 07:14 AM
after realizing i was completely terrible, i did some reading up on the game.

during the match dynasty was complaining about "collusion" and claimed it was not in good form.

i come to find in my reading that smaller armies banding together is part of the game, and open diplomacy is a major factor of the game.

as if you needed that other edge to dominate some risk-virgins. shrewd.
samjjones
11-30-2005, 10:23 AM
Anybody interested in OOT A&A?
Dynasty
11-30-2005, 07:47 PM
[ QUOTE ]

during the match dynasty was complaining about "collusion" and claimed it was not in good form.

i come to find in my reading that smaller armies banding together is part of the game, and open diplomacy is a major factor of the game.


[/ QUOTE ]

I wasn't complaining about collusion. Somebody asked if collusion is okay and I said it was discouraged- especially in a game with newbies.

I think the specific word "collusion" came across differently than you intended. That suggested two or more players choosing to work together regardless of all other factors until all the others were eliminated.

Diplomacy and alliances are good. Collusion is bad.

I'll probably be playing again tonight.
Ulysses
11-30-2005, 07:53 PM
Dynasty,

It has been about 14 years since the last time I played Risk, but it used to be a favorite game of mine. I would enjoy playing and hopefully I'll be around when you get the next game started.

Also, I hope you have a chance to look at my Quick Reply thread for some information on how to optimally use this awesome new feature.

Good gaming,
El Diablo
BottlesOf
11-30-2005, 07:57 PM
I was all about it at first. But quick reply sucks and ruins expanded mode.
TomCollins
11-30-2005, 07:59 PM
El Diablo,

I'd be honored to have you play tonight. You going to be around in a few hours?

(I have read your QR thread for optimal use).

TC
Ulysses
11-30-2005, 08:04 PM
JBB: QR only ruins threaded view, which only dolts use anyway.

TC: I am likely to be around in a few hours! If I'm free then I'd love to join. I will check back in a couple of hours after I'm finished at work.

Excitedly,
El Diablo
gorie
11-30-2005, 08:18 PM
i call red!