PDA

View Full Version : POLL: Breaking an Addiction


Jeebus
11-29-2005, 02:01 AM
So I just quit smoking cigs and was talking to my roommate about it. We got to talking about what addiction is hardest to break. We finally agreed on Heroin (though we have no experience with it) but discussed a bunch of stuff including all the options that I don't feel like listing again. I have my opinions on everything but I want to save them till I see some responses.

11-29-2005, 02:02 AM
wow this is tough. i would say shooting up but i have no experience with that so maybe smoking cig.

jesusarenque
11-29-2005, 02:04 AM
My mom was recently diagnosed with lung cancer (she was a smoker). Her doctor told her that kicking a smoking habit is harder than kicking heroin. I don't know if it is true, but that is what he told her.

NLSoldier
11-29-2005, 02:05 AM
reading oot by far.

jba
11-29-2005, 02:07 AM
while there are many many things on this list that look like very difficult vices to kick, I just can't see myself going ten days without nutting and then sitting through a couple episodes of "Wild on ____" without abusing myself

11-29-2005, 02:09 AM
Crystal Meth

InchoateHand
11-29-2005, 02:13 AM
I would say gambling, looking at OOT (extrapolate to procrastinating via the internet), smoking and masturbating are all a lot harder than kicking heroin.

fluxrad
11-29-2005, 02:16 AM
Definitely shopping.

Not buying stuff is hard.

PokerGoblin
11-29-2005, 02:20 AM
Here's your answer:

Direct quote from Ozzy Osbourne:

"Cigarrette smoke is the most addictive thing I have ever put into my body."

Dr. Strangelove
11-29-2005, 02:24 AM
I could quit every one of these except masterdebating. I've gone months without doing it in the past and it's unbearable.

trying2learn
11-29-2005, 11:30 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I could quit every one of these except masterdebating. I've gone months without doing it in the past and it's unbearable.

[/ QUOTE ]


just out of curiosity...why would you go months without it? especially if it was unbearable...

SL__72
11-29-2005, 11:33 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Crystal Meth

[/ QUOTE ]

I was going to say this. Plus isn't there like a 90%+ chance you will be addicted after one usage?

InchoateHand
11-29-2005, 11:34 AM
[ QUOTE ]

I was going to say this. Plus isn't there like a 90%+ chance you will be addicted after one usage?

[/ QUOTE ]

Depends what you mean by "addicted?"

Actually, it doesn't. Thats an absurd statistic---are you joking, or did someone actually tell you that?

And cigarettes are way harder than crystal meth.

pokerdirty
11-29-2005, 11:50 AM
[ QUOTE ]
masturbating

[/ QUOTE ]

Oblivious
11-29-2005, 05:27 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Crystal Meth

[/ QUOTE ]

Relapse rates for meth are higher than those of heroin.

samjjones
11-29-2005, 05:47 PM
http://community-2.webtv.net/robmbr/RobsReviewHomePage/media/captureD4.jpg

istewart
11-29-2005, 05:53 PM
lol

mason55
11-29-2005, 05:54 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Crystal Meth

[/ QUOTE ]

I was going to say this. Plus isn't there like a 90%+ chance you will be addicted after one usage?

[/ QUOTE ]

72% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

istewart
11-29-2005, 05:55 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Crystal Meth

[/ QUOTE ]

I was going to say this. Plus isn't there like a 90%+ chance you will be addicted after one usage?

[/ QUOTE ]

72% of all statistics are made up on the spot.

[/ QUOTE ]

Brilliant!

11-29-2005, 08:16 PM
I used meth almost daily for a year and a half. It was easy to quit once I decided to do it. The physical addictiveness of meth is way overrated. The only reason it's hard to quit is that it so distorts your lifestyle that it requires an almost complete break from your life to get off it. In the months after I quit meth I was so bored I thought I'd die.

private joker
11-29-2005, 08:23 PM
I tried smoking cigarettes once and it didn't take. OOT, on the other hand... *sigh*

InchoateHand
11-29-2005, 08:24 PM
Look up anhedonia, its a bitch. Never got too much into meth, because I like my lips, I'm a cranky son of a bitch, and ups make me violent. That said, I always felt like [censored] after even a minor binge. Never really craved it though. Other things were far more difficult, but as I alluded many posts ago, I've been off the bad stuff for quite some time, but I still smoke, procrastinate and jerkoff.

jba
11-29-2005, 08:29 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I used meth almost daily for a year and a half. It was easy to quit once I decided to do it. The physical addictiveness of meth is way overrated. The only reason it's hard to quit is that it so distorts your lifestyle that it requires an almost complete break from your life to get off it. In the months after I quit meth I was so bored I thought I'd die.

[/ QUOTE ]

sounds like weed

11-29-2005, 11:27 PM
Hi jeebus,

Is stroking it/looking at porn really an addiction? Its like, I enjoy eating supper, and I frequently eat supper, but does that make me addicted to it?

craig r
11-30-2005, 03:36 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I used meth almost daily for a year and a half. It was easy to quit once I decided to do it. The physical addictiveness of meth is way overrated. The only reason it's hard to quit is that it so distorts your lifestyle that it requires an almost complete break from your life to get off it. In the months after I quit meth I was so bored I thought I'd die.

[/ QUOTE ]

I know that the physical addictiveness of coke is also possibly not a huge problem. I know that there is no physical reason that you need to go to rehab in order to quit coke. In fact, I was talking to some people that go to AA (some were ex-heroin junkies and some were alcoholics) and they had told me that the only drug that you had to have medical attention if you quit is alcohol. I was suprised by this, because I always thought that you could die if you weren't given proper medical attention when quitting heroin. I know opiates are physically addictive, but I think it is physically possible to quit on your own without dying.

As far as your "boredom" when you quit meth, I think that is fairly common for most stimulants. I know with coke it can last up to a year before you start feeling better.

craig

11-30-2005, 03:39 AM
this is why I stick with weed.

I cant honestly see the upside of the other drugs.

Except maybe shrooms.

craig r
11-30-2005, 03:43 AM
[ QUOTE ]
this is why I stick with weed.

I cant honestly see the upside of the other drugs.

Except maybe shrooms.

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't like dope that much. It makes me paranoid and nervous for some reason. When I was in high school I could smoke it, but even then I would much rather do shrooms or LSD (possible bigger risks mentally than most other drugs).

craig

11-30-2005, 03:46 AM
mini hijack, but is it true that medically shrooms have no ill effect on your body? Not including what you do while high, of course.

About the paranoia thing, honestly, I think that might be due to the type of weed you smoked. Im sure I could point you towards a strain that will give you the opposite of that type of high, but Im sure you really couldn't care less.

Mason Hellmuth
11-30-2005, 03:47 AM
You forgot caffeine.

craig r
11-30-2005, 03:49 AM
[ QUOTE ]
mini hijack, but is it true that medically shrooms have no ill effect on your body? Not including what you do while high, of course.

About the paranoia thing, honestly, I think that might be due to the type of weed you smoked. Im sure I could point you towards a strain that will give you the opposite of that type of high, but Im sure you really couldn't care less.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, shrooms are potentially dangerous. It is a poison. I know it can cause some problems with the brain. It is generally considered safer than LSD because the risks of "perma-frying are much lower, but you can take too many shrooms and have to go to the hospital for physical reasons.

craig

craig r
11-30-2005, 03:58 AM
I know that all drugs have different effects on the mind and body, but in the end, addiction is addiction. Lots of cokeheads and heroin addicts go to AA. There is so much more to doing the drug than the acutal high. I have talked to a lot of (ex)addicts recently and from what I gather there isn't much difference between a smack addict and a sex addict. But, physically I think heroin is probably the toughest to quit.

I find it strange that you left alcohol off your poll. Considering that is the drug that is consumed in the most quantity and most likely now kills more people than cigs (I could be wrong).

I also find it strange that you left crystal off your list. When I lived in Oregon I had never seen so many tweekers. I don't know much about the physical addictiveness of this drug, but for those who want to stay high for a LONG time for a cheap price (compared to other drugs) this seems like the drug of choice. I know somebody below said that one has a 90% chance of becoming addicted to it, and I think that number is too high for any drug, but people love it. And in rural areas it is huge. And one can live a pretty long toothless, acne filled life using it.

craig

Jeebus
11-30-2005, 02:23 PM
I'm not really around too much meth. I do livein Ky though so it should be all around me and I should think of it. I would have put it and crack in if I had thought longer.

Having known someone who was addicted to just about everything on that poll I 'll finally put up my thoughts. I definatly think meth/crack/heroin are the hardest to treat in the full on addict stage. By that point your body has become so attuned to working with those drugs in that quitting can seriously injure you. Plus those are the kind of drugs where you don't do much more than just use and sit and then sell some stuff to get more.
Alcohol runs a real close second here in that it is incrdibly addictive but it seems to have a higher rate of someone looking in the mirror and going forget it, no more drinking for me. Its physical withdrawl is alot worse than most drugs, but the mental side isn't there so much.

To the casual user/minor addict, I have to go with cocaine or cigarettes. They both provide that cure to boredom and become associated with nearly all other activities. It is this which makes it hard to quit.

Rduke55
11-30-2005, 02:28 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
mini hijack, but is it true that medically shrooms have no ill effect on your body? Not including what you do while high, of course.

About the paranoia thing, honestly, I think that might be due to the type of weed you smoked. Im sure I could point you towards a strain that will give you the opposite of that type of high, but Im sure you really couldn't care less.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, shrooms are potentially dangerous. It is a poison. I know it can cause some problems with the brain. It is generally considered safer than LSD because the risks of "perma-frying are much lower, but you can take too many shrooms and have to go to the hospital for physical reasons.

craig

[/ QUOTE ]

Perma-frying?
Psychedelics are the safest drugs you can take. The lethal dose of LSD is an order of magnitude or two higher than almost any other recreational drug. And they definitely don't affect the brain like people say. All that stuff is a myth.

imported_The Vibesman
11-30-2005, 02:30 PM
I think it's cigarettes, and the reason why isn't the actual addictiveness of the product, but rather, how much you have to put up with it after you quit. With coke, heroin, meth, even alcohol to some extent, after you quit it is easy to avoid users. You just don't go where they congregate. Alcohol is worse, because so many restaurants have it and there are commercials on TV, but at least you can look away. With cigarettes, you can be driving in your car with the window open and smell the smoke of the guy in the car next to you at a light, or you smell the smoke of another pedestrian in the street, and bang, you want 'em. And they're available everywhere, you have to look at them when you buy a paper or magazine. People on TV smoke, in the movies, constantly, and watching them makes you want one. When people say cigs are tougher than heroin, they're referring to a higher relapse rate, and I think the fact that cigs are so ubiquitious plays a big part of that.

Rduke55
11-30-2005, 02:32 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I think it's cigarettes, and the reason why isn't the actual addictiveness of the product, but rather, how much you have to put up with it after you quit. With coke, heroin, meth, even alcohol to some extent, after you quit it is easy to avoid users. You just don't go where they congregate. Alcohol is worse, because so many restaurants have it and there are commercials on TV, but at least you can look away. With cigarettes, you can be driving in your car with the window open and smell the smoke of the guy in the car next to you at a light, or you smell the smoke of another pedestrian in the street, and bang, you want 'em. And they're available everywhere, you have to look at them when you buy a paper or magazine. People on TV smoke, in the movies, constantly, and watching them makes you want one. When people say cigs are tougher than heroin, they're referring to a higher relapse rate, and I think the fact that cigs are so ubiquitious plays a big part of that.

[/ QUOTE ]

I like this line of thinking.

Jeebus
11-30-2005, 03:55 PM
However doing lots of hallucinagens or really strong doses can leave small remnants on you. I know that I occaissonally smell the smell of Acid when I am sitting around, normally when I want a smoke. Also, I see small things behind me in dirty reflections and see shadows on a wall in a degree of 3d all which seems a result of constant use of mushrooms and acid for about 8 months. My mind seems fine, or maybe better than when i started but my perception of the world around me has been somewhat permanently altered. I could see how doing enough acid could permafry your brain.

craig r
11-30-2005, 04:52 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
mini hijack, but is it true that medically shrooms have no ill effect on your body? Not including what you do while high, of course.

About the paranoia thing, honestly, I think that might be due to the type of weed you smoked. Im sure I could point you towards a strain that will give you the opposite of that type of high, but Im sure you really couldn't care less.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, shrooms are potentially dangerous. It is a poison. I know it can cause some problems with the brain. It is generally considered safer than LSD because the risks of "perma-frying are much lower, but you can take too many shrooms and have to go to the hospital for physical reasons.

craig

[/ QUOTE ]

Perma-frying?
Psychedelics are the safest drugs you can take. The lethal dose of LSD is an order of magnitude or two higher than almost any other recreational drug. And they definitely don't affect the brain like people say. All that stuff is a myth.

[/ QUOTE ]

I never said LSD was physically lethal. What I meant by "perrma-frying" is when you do to much LSD and/or shrooms you can really damage your brain to the point where you are almost always frying/tripping. This was definitely more common in the 60/70's. And to say that they don't effect the brain is not a myth. You never get "flashbacks"? They don't happen to me very often, but when they do it almost feels as if I am tripping again (I have never had a bad flash back). I agree that most things people say about LSD is a myth (like it could fck up your genes, etc...), but one builds up tolerance to it very quickly (like if you take a hit today and then try taking a hit tomorrow, it won't have nearly as strong of an effect as the first hit, so you have to take two, etc... If this goes on for a while it "could" cause damage to your brain.

craig

Rduke55
11-30-2005, 04:58 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
mini hijack, but is it true that medically shrooms have no ill effect on your body? Not including what you do while high, of course.

About the paranoia thing, honestly, I think that might be due to the type of weed you smoked. Im sure I could point you towards a strain that will give you the opposite of that type of high, but Im sure you really couldn't care less.

[/ QUOTE ]

No, shrooms are potentially dangerous. It is a poison. I know it can cause some problems with the brain. It is generally considered safer than LSD because the risks of "perma-frying are much lower, but you can take too many shrooms and have to go to the hospital for physical reasons.

craig

[/ QUOTE ]

Perma-frying?
Psychedelics are the safest drugs you can take. The lethal dose of LSD is an order of magnitude or two higher than almost any other recreational drug. And they definitely don't affect the brain like people say. All that stuff is a myth.

[/ QUOTE ]

I never said LSD was physically lethal. What I meant by "perrma-frying" is when you do to much LSD and/or shrooms you can really damage your brain to the point where you are almost always frying/tripping. This was definitely more common in the 60/70's. And to say that they don't effect the brain is not a myth. You never get "flashbacks"? They don't happen to me very often, but when they do it almost feels as if I am tripping again (I have never had a bad flash back). I agree that most things people say about LSD is a myth (like it could fck up your genes, etc...), but one builds up tolerance to it very quickly (like if you take a hit today and then try taking a hit tomorrow, it won't have nearly as strong of an effect as the first hit, so you have to take two, etc... If this goes on for a while it "could" cause damage to your brain.

craig

[/ QUOTE ]

Um...no. You do not damage your brain. You do not build up a tolerance. And there's a huge difference between "flashbacks" and the damage you're talking about. Most people do not get flashbacks.

Rduke55
11-30-2005, 05:01 PM
[ QUOTE ]
However doing lots of hallucinagens or really strong doses can leave small remnants on you. I know that I occaissonally smell the smell of Acid when I am sitting around, normally when I want a smoke. Also, I see small things behind me in dirty reflections and see shadows on a wall in a degree of 3d all which seems a result of constant use of mushrooms and acid for about 8 months. My mind seems fine, or maybe better than when i started but my perception of the world around me has been somewhat permanently altered. I could see how doing enough acid could permafry your brain.

[/ QUOTE ]

Smelling acid? I "smell" cocaine occasionally. It's normal. Associations are very powerful but attributing it to short term use (8 months in your example) is ridiculous. You're working with a "n" of 1 here. Your subbjective experiences.

craig r
11-30-2005, 05:09 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not really around too much meth. I do livein Ky though so it should be all around me and I should think of it. I would have put it and crack in if I had thought longer.

Having known someone who was addicted to just about everything on that poll I 'll finally put up my thoughts. I definatly think meth/crack/heroin are the hardest to treat in the full on addict stage. By that point your body has become so attuned to working with those drugs in that quitting can seriously injure you. Plus those are the kind of drugs where you don't do much more than just use and sit and then sell some stuff to get more.
Alcohol runs a real close second here in that it is incrdibly addictive but it seems to have a higher rate of someone looking in the mirror and going forget it, no more drinking for me. Its physical withdrawl is alot worse than most drugs, but the mental side isn't there so much.

To the casual user/minor addict, I have to go with cocaine or cigarettes. They both provide that cure to boredom and become associated with nearly all other activities. It is this which makes it hard to quit.

[/ QUOTE ]

I agree with you about cocaine/cigs being very addictive as well. One "good thing" about cocaine is that you can function for a while without anybody really knowing. Cocaine doesn't really make you "out of it" like alcohol or heroin does. Generally the biggest damage done by cocaine use is to your checkbook (at least the first 5-6 months). And then, if you start running out of money, but want to continue, a lot of people end up moving on to crack, because it is much cheaper.

All of the drugs you mentioned are the toughest to quit. Crack and heroin especially if you are mixing alcohol with it. Which I guess a lot of people do with cocaine. When I had talked to counselors in the past (long ago past) they generally do not recommend quitting both without going to a hospital to make sure you will physically be okay. But, if you have a coke problem, you can quit without medical supervision. I am not saying to not go to a hospital, but your risk of dying from quitting is not really there. The risk is suicide. Of course, I think this is a risk from quitting all major drugs (including alcohol, but not pot or LSD). With cocaine your dopamines take forever to get back to a normal state, which puts people in an extreme depression. With meth, not only are your dopamines affected, but so is your serotonin level and one other chemical that I can't remember. I really don't know how heroin affects the brain.

I also think we could all debate which "hard drug" (including alcohol) is the toughest to quit, but they are all really hard to quit. And when it is all said and done, it is all the same. Your problem usually isn't a/the drug, but the addiction. And almost all addictions take on the same form of ritual, emotional problems, etc... I think the addicts biggest problem is that they are the starving beast with the big belly that can't ever be full.

craig

ContactGSW
11-30-2005, 05:29 PM
I don't consider stroking it an addiction, its a natural body function, so thats out(Yay). It's nicotine for me. When I finally got too old for the Ganja I found I nostalgicly missed it, but had little physiological problems letting go. I've never smoked but have been totally addicted to dip, smokeless tobacco, for years. To the point where I would put a huge gob in before a 3 hour medical procedure, mask and gown up, and just not spit until it was over. Then scrub out and immeadiatly load up again. The cost to my teeth is the main reason I have let go, I won't lose a tooth to this stuff, but still must keep two 4mg niccorette gum pieces in my mouth at all times and it is months since I last dipped. I regret the first day I ever put that crap in my mouth but wish I could pop a lid right now.

Jeebus
11-30-2005, 05:37 PM
When I am on acid the world smells a certain way. Never smelled that smell any other time. And I was sitting in my living room so its not like i went around something new. Now I occaisonnally become aware of th smell at random places.
My boy has flashbacks to a trip that was way too intense for him (he lost his sense of ego or self whichever you want to call it) when he does nitrous. That's always funny.

Rduke55
11-30-2005, 05:49 PM
[ QUOTE ]
When I am on acid the world smells a certain way. Never smelled that smell any other time. And I was sitting in my living room so its not like i went around something new. Now I occaisonnally become aware of th smell at random places.
My boy has flashbacks to a trip that was way too intense for him (he lost his sense of ego or self whichever you want to call it) when he does nitrous. That's always funny.

[/ QUOTE ]

So you associate a certain smell with a trip. Or you associate some other cue with this smell and perceive it (perhaps inappropriately). How is that damage? People that have never done drugs before have similar experiences.
And in your second example, he's doing nitrous for christ's sake!