View Full Version : Stupid bluffing idiots that get lucky
Sponger15SB
11-27-2005, 01:35 PM
So I'm playing a HU SNG on pokerstars and I pick up 2 /images/graemlins/spade.gif2 /images/graemlins/club.gif, Villian has about 1700 chips to my 1300. Blinds are 10/20
I make the standard 3bb raise. Villian calls.
Flop is 4 /images/graemlins/heart.gif8 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif9 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif and Villian Pushes.
Now, I haven't played that many hands with Villian, but he is extremely agressive and I don't think he has much. So I make the call, and sure enough he has J /images/graemlins/diamond.gifT /images/graemlins/diamond.gif! Sweet!
Turn is a blank, and River is a T /images/graemlins/club.gif
Just another example of me making an incredible read with a marginal hand, and having some stupid moron suckout on me. God I [censored] hate poker.
Sorry, you're an underdog with 22 vs his straight flush draw + 2 overcards.
Sponger15SB
11-27-2005, 01:49 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, you're an underdog with 22 vs his straight flush draw + 2 overcards.
[/ QUOTE ]
No he isn't? What the [censored] are you talking about?
Look at the flop, he has jack high, I have a pair.
Btw...
*** You are ignoring this user ***
Buh-bye
Cancuk
11-27-2005, 02:01 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, you're an underdog with 22 vs his straight flush draw + 2 overcards.
[/ QUOTE ]
No he isn't? What the [censored] are you talking about?
Look at the flop, he has jack high, I have a pair.
Btw...
*** You are ignoring this user ***
Buh-bye
[/ QUOTE ]
awesome.
maybe this new forum is a good idea.
Jacob_Gilliam
11-27-2005, 02:01 PM
He has 21 outs against you twice. Your opponent is the favorite, not you.
wmspringer
11-27-2005, 02:02 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, you're an underdog with 22 vs his straight flush draw + 2 overcards.
[/ QUOTE ]
No he isn't? What the [censored] are you talking about?
Look at the flop, he has jack high, I have a pair.
[/ QUOTE ]
So he only wins with any 7, T, J, Q, or diamond.. Twodimes has the jack hand winning 72% of the time.
BTW...grow up
Mike Haven
11-27-2005, 02:04 PM
I need to try to get on the same page as you.
Are these posts supposed to be Bad Beats or are they Brags about your reading skills?
Sponger15SB
11-27-2005, 02:19 PM
[ QUOTE ]
*** You are ignoring this user ***
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger15SB
11-27-2005, 02:20 PM
[ QUOTE ]
*** You are ignoring this user ***
[/ QUOTE ]
.
smoore
11-27-2005, 02:31 PM
Sponger. = FUNNAY
9 diamonds, QJT7 for 12 more. yeah that's pretty decent.
Sponger15SB
11-27-2005, 02:43 PM
[ QUOTE ]
yeah that's pretty decent.
[/ QUOTE ]
Thanks. Finally somebody agrees with me.
Thalum
11-27-2005, 02:54 PM
His play was hardly a bluff....
wmspringer
11-27-2005, 02:54 PM
LOL...apparently he's going to ignore everyone who points out he was wrong..
Ulysses
11-27-2005, 02:58 PM
Rigged.
wmspringer
11-27-2005, 03:09 PM
I really want to know what this guy's pokerstars handle is..
imported_CaseClosed326
11-27-2005, 03:11 PM
riverstars
jcmoussa
11-27-2005, 03:15 PM
Raise his all in on the flop and then reevaluate your hand based on his facial expression.
lighterjobs
11-27-2005, 03:17 PM
omfg rigged. [censored] morans with their connected suiters.
Dan Rutter
11-27-2005, 03:24 PM
You made sure to tell that moron that he sucks at poker, and life in general, right?
Sponger15SB
11-27-2005, 03:31 PM
[ QUOTE ]
You made sure to tell that moron that he sucks at poker, and life in general, right?
[/ QUOTE ]
Duh.
Sponger15SB
11-27-2005, 03:33 PM
[ QUOTE ]
His play was hardly a bluff....
[/ QUOTE ]
Ok, I don't know how to tell you idiots this any more.
If you look at the hand, I had a pair, he had Jack high. It is pretty simple. If you don't see this and agree with me that this was [censored], you're going on ignore as well.
Ulysses
11-27-2005, 03:35 PM
Sponger,
Relax, man. These morons have probably never done a cashout so they have not seen the rigged crap where they go all-in with a pair and some moron w/ Jack-high ends up winning. As you know, once they cashout, this rigged BS will start happening and then they will change their tune about these ridiculous beats.
WordWhiz
11-27-2005, 03:53 PM
This forum doesn't need a sarcasm smiley. It needs a giant beeping strobe light screaming "SARCASM, SARCASM YOU MORON" at 120 decibels, preferably while also sending a power surge through the USB port to deliver an electric shock via the mouse to the reader which renders him incapable of movement until it sinks in.
Schneids
11-27-2005, 03:57 PM
[ QUOTE ]
This forum doesn't need a sarcasm smiley. It needs a giant beeping strobe light screaming "SARCASM, SARCASM YOU MORON" at 120 decibels, preferably while also sending a power surge through the USB port to deliver an electric shock via the mouse to the reader which renders him incapable of movement until it sinks in.
[/ QUOTE ]
I have talked poker with Sponger before. I'm pretty sure he actually believes he got bad beated. Don't let your common sense get in the way!!
Daniture
11-27-2005, 04:02 PM
[ QUOTE ]
9 diamonds, QJT7 for 12 more. yeah that's pretty decent.
[/ QUOTE ]
You forgot the factor in the board double pairing and the Jack playing kicker!!!
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
His play was hardly a bluff....
[/ QUOTE ]
Ok, I don't know how to tell you idiots this any more.
If you look at the hand, I had a pair, he had Jack high. It is pretty simple. If you don't see this and agree with me that this was [censored], you're going on ignore as well.
[/ QUOTE ]Yeah, it's pretty simple...
Let's look at what CardPlayer Odds calculator has to say.
-Chances of winning the hand after the flop-
Villain: 72.3%
Hero: 27.7%
[...] /images/graemlins/ooo.gif
wmspringer
11-27-2005, 04:31 PM
[ QUOTE ]
This forum doesn't need a sarcasm smiley. It needs a giant beeping strobe light screaming "SARCASM, SARCASM YOU MORON" at 120 decibels, preferably while also sending a power surge through the USB port to deliver an electric shock via the mouse to the reader which renders him incapable of movement until it sinks in.
[/ QUOTE ]
Diablo's sarcasm is obvious, but I can't shake the feeling that sponger could be serious..
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
Ulysses
11-27-2005, 04:53 PM
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
TheMainEvent
11-27-2005, 04:57 PM
[ QUOTE ]
JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.psiframe.com/~jkwan/jackhigh.gif
Justin A
11-27-2005, 05:16 PM
Can we just rename this forum to Sponger's forum?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
TheMainEvent
11-27-2005, 05:54 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
runner4life7
11-27-2005, 05:56 PM
anyone else want to run the %s for you because clearly it hasnt been done yet. You noobs all run to get your program to show you were right when no [censored] you were. I hope you all have a huge boner as you just knew which hand was a favorite in a poker game. I thought this post would be funny till i read all the responses...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
Ulysses
11-27-2005, 06:13 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
Arnfinn Madsen
11-27-2005, 06:22 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]
POTY
LOTY (link of the year)
/images/graemlins/laugh.gif
TheMainEvent
11-27-2005, 06:23 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
What do you think you're psychic or something? Trying to predict the turn and river cards? In No Limit the only thing that matters is who has the best hand when the money goes in. Unless you have some crystal ball that's going to tell you when somebody is about to suck out you're not going to get far in this game worrying about cards you can't even see!
JaBlue
11-27-2005, 06:27 PM
[ QUOTE ]
The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
outs as in short for suckouts??? /images/graemlins/confused.gif /images/graemlins/confused.gif /images/graemlins/confused.gif
Ulysses
11-27-2005, 06:37 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
Sponger15SB
11-27-2005, 06:42 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
kurosh
11-27-2005, 07:07 PM
Wow. No wonder the games are so soft. The people here don't even know the hand rankings!
Lol. I'm a favorite.....LOL!!!
I based my answer on this particular sentence.
"Just another example of me making an incredible read with a marginal hand, and having some stupid moron suckout on me. God I [censored] hate poker. "
You are a 3:1 underdog... If you had won, you would have been the sucker.
Ulysses
11-27-2005, 07:28 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I based my answer on this particular sentence.
"Just another example of me making an incredible read with a marginal hand, and having some stupid moron suckout on me. God I [censored] hate poker. "
You are a 3:1 underdog... If you had won, you would have been the sucker.
[/ QUOTE ]
Dude, you need to go buy a poker book or something. Or maybe just a HAND RANKINGS chart so you understand what the f you are talking about.
adanthar
11-27-2005, 07:35 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I thought this post would be funny till i read all the responses...
[/ QUOTE ]
The responses are what makes reading this thread worth while.
Losing all
11-27-2005, 07:45 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I based my answer on this particular sentence.
"Just another example of me making an incredible read with a marginal hand, and having some stupid moron suckout on me. God I [censored] hate poker. "
You are a 3:1 underdog... If you had won, you would have been the sucker.
[/ QUOTE ]
You really need to start the 2+2 experience in a different section, newb
The OP is classic. Check out this other post: Link to earlier rant. (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=4034126&an=0&page=1#Post 4034126)
A gentle poster sent me a private message telling me that you are most probably messing with me, lol.
Thanks, anonymous helper.
runner4life7
11-27-2005, 08:28 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I thought this post would be funny till i read all the responses...
[/ QUOTE ]
The responses are what makes reading this thread worth while.
[/ QUOTE ]
I agree now, at first i was annoyed that they could all be clueless, but now im enjoying it.
2+2 wannabe
11-27-2005, 08:36 PM
[ QUOTE ]
A gentle poster sent me a private message telling me that you are most probably messing with me, lol.
Thanks, anonymous helper.
[/ QUOTE ]
no offense - but how could you not tell
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
A gentle poster sent me a private message telling me that you are most probably messing with me, lol.
Thanks, anonymous helper.
[/ QUOTE ]
no offense - but how could you not tell
[/ QUOTE ]I have some difficulties with sarcasm in English, they don't talk about that in second-language classes or whatever.
I'll try to look less stupid the next time, hehe.
Benoit
11-27-2005, 09:12 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
A pocket pair is always going to be best, and you always have a redraw to trips and a full house.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
A pocket pair is always going to be best, and you always have a redraw to trips and a full house.
[/ QUOTE ]
don't forget about quads
smoore
11-27-2005, 09:45 PM
I'm surprised this is the first mention of a redraw.
Hahaha this forum truly is my favorite
Benoit
11-27-2005, 11:23 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
A pocket pair is always going to be best, and you always have a redraw to trips and a full house.
[/ QUOTE ]
don't forget about quads
[/ QUOTE ]
Thank you, I almost forgot the quads re-redraw.
Fabian
11-27-2005, 11:30 PM
I've read this forum three or four times and every time one of the first post I read is one like this with like 20 dead serious dude your awful hes the favorite responses. Is this really the secret forum for people without sarcasm detectors?
Solami17
11-27-2005, 11:37 PM
Wait, wasnt villian the favorite after the flop?
Shilly
11-27-2005, 11:39 PM
Dude, did you not read the thread? Hero has a PAIR. Villain has jack high. A PAIR is better than jack high.
adanthar
11-27-2005, 11:41 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Is this really the secret forum for people without sarcasm detectors?
[/ QUOTE ]
No, this is the forum where we make fun of them
mikech
11-27-2005, 11:48 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
Lol I love that now. /images/graemlins/wink.gif
DMBFan23
11-28-2005, 01:48 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
well played, sir
DcifrThs
11-28-2005, 02:16 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
mikech
11-28-2005, 02:29 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
PoBoy321
11-28-2005, 02:36 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
[/ QUOTE ]
The new insta-quote button is da sh1znizzl3!
TheMainEvent
11-28-2005, 02:38 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
[/ QUOTE ]
The new insta-quote button is da sh1znizzl3!
[/ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/confused.gif
PoBoy321
11-28-2005, 02:39 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
[/ QUOTE ]
The new insta-quote button is da sh1znizzl3!
[/ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/confused.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
See, all I need to do is click "Quote" at the the top of each post, and it automatically quotes the entire post with the quote boxes and everything.
TheMainEvent
11-28-2005, 02:41 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
[/ QUOTE ]
The new insta-quote button is da sh1znizzl3!
[/ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/confused.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
See, all I need to do is click "Quote" at the the top of each post, and it automatically quotes the entire post with the quote boxes and everything.
[/ QUOTE ]
I'll have to try that out
PoBoy321
11-28-2005, 02:41 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
[/ QUOTE ]
The new insta-quote button is da sh1znizzl3!
[/ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/confused.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
See, all I need to do is click "Quote" at the the top of each post, and it automatically quotes the entire post with the quote boxes and everything.
[/ QUOTE ]
I'll have to try that out
[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, it's a lot easier than doing it manually, which is obviously what you're doing.
TheMainEvent
11-28-2005, 02:45 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
[/ QUOTE ]
The new insta-quote button is da sh1znizzl3!
[/ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/confused.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
See, all I need to do is click "Quote" at the the top of each post, and it automatically quotes the entire post with the quote boxes and everything.
[/ QUOTE ]
I'll have to try that out
[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, it's a lot easier than doing it manually, which is obviously what you're doing.
[/ QUOTE ]
I thought I already found the mother of all quoting shortcuts when I heard about ctrl-c/ctrl-v
PoBoy321
11-28-2005, 02:47 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
[/ QUOTE ]
The new insta-quote button is da sh1znizzl3!
[/ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/confused.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
See, all I need to do is click "Quote" at the the top of each post, and it automatically quotes the entire post with the quote boxes and everything.
[/ QUOTE ]
I'll have to try that out
[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, it's a lot easier than doing it manually, which is obviously what you're doing.
[/ QUOTE ]
I thought I already found the mother of all quoting shortcuts when I heard about ctrl-c/ctrl-v
[/ QUOTE ]
The problem is that ctrl-c/ctrl-v doesn't get all of the quote boxes right.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
[/ QUOTE ]
The new insta-quote button is da sh1znizzl3!
[/ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/confused.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
See, all I need to do is click "Quote" at the the top of each post, and it automatically quotes the entire post with the quote boxes and everything.
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think that's new.
PoBoy321
11-28-2005, 03:00 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
[/ QUOTE ]
The new insta-quote button is da sh1znizzl3!
[/ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/confused.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
See, all I need to do is click "Quote" at the the top of each post, and it automatically quotes the entire post with the quote boxes and everything.
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think that's new.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well it's new to me.
Your last name isn't Stillman by any chance, is it? Do you like to wear NBA throwback jersey's? You a bowler?
There seems to be a lot of confusement on this thread. My head is spinning, and my tongue has fallen completely out of my cheek for some reason.
(btw, how did you know my wife's name was Villian?)
sweetjazz
11-28-2005, 03:56 AM
The fact that you have made over 10,000 posts on this forum and still don't know a thing about poker is very encouraging in regard to the long-term health of online poker.
Please ignore me. I will feel much better ridiculing you knowing that you won't see it.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
[/ QUOTE ]
The new insta-quote button is da sh1znizzl3!
[/ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/confused.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
See, all I need to do is click "Quote" at the the top of each post, and it automatically quotes the entire post with the quote boxes and everything.
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think that's new.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well it's new to me.
[/ QUOTE ]
wtf are you guys using for equity?
i put this through pokerstove
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 17.3232 % 82.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 82.6768 % 17.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
peritonlogon
11-28-2005, 03:59 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
[/ QUOTE ]
The new insta-quote button is da sh1znizzl3!
[/ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/confused.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
See, all I need to do is click "Quote" at the the top of each post, and it automatically quotes the entire post with the quote boxes and everything.
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think that's new.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well it's new to me.
[/ QUOTE ]
wtf are you guys using for equity?
i put this through pokerstove
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 17.3232 % 82.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 82.6768 % 17.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
nice1
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
[/ QUOTE ]
The new insta-quote button is da sh1znizzl3!
[/ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/confused.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
See, all I need to do is click "Quote" at the the top of each post, and it automatically quotes the entire post with the quote boxes and everything.
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think that's new.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well it's new to me.
[/ QUOTE ]
wtf are you guys using for equity?
i put this through pokerstove
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 17.3232 % 82.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 82.6768 % 17.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
nice1
[/ QUOTE ]
ty
Justin A
11-28-2005, 04:31 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
Barron can you explain what you mean by that post?
peritonlogon
11-28-2005, 04:54 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
Barron can you explain what you mean by that post?
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't mean to put words in his mouth, but it's obvious he meant, how could someone be so gullible as to think jack high is a better hand than a pair.
Marnixvdb
11-28-2005, 05:29 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
[/ QUOTE ]
The new insta-quote button is da sh1znizzl3!
[/ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/confused.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
See, all I need to do is click "Quote" at the the top of each post, and it automatically quotes the entire post with the quote boxes and everything.
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think that's new.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well it's new to me.
[/ QUOTE ]
wtf are you guys using for equity?
i put this through pokerstove
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 17.3232 % 82.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 82.6768 % 17.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
nice1
[/ QUOTE ]
ty
[/ QUOTE ]
I believe strongly that Cardplayer skewed its pot odds caculator to take into account the average riggedness of online poker. I have no idea how else they could have JT as a favourite over 22.
DRD66
11-28-2005, 06:04 AM
OK, I gotta chime in here with 3 comments:
1) I love this forum, as it let's me interact with total psychos who don't post in my usual forum. It's a whole new world!
2) 2+2 needs to double their server capacity since adding the "quote" button. Also, if you print out these uber-quote replies, they make good dart boards
3) Please, for the love of god, PLEASE tell me massive amounts of alcohol were involved in the OP. You must use "second level" thinking - ie. it's SOOOOOOOOOO stupid it can't possible be sarcastic, he must really be that stupid. On the other hand, I think Diablo is my new hero.
Burno
11-28-2005, 07:39 AM
Oh the hypocrisy. Diablo busts Mason's ass over an error but then can't own up to a massive mistake like this. Though in El D's defense, he's not quibbling over semantics or retreating from his former position, he is instead employing a strategy of increasing belligerence to make his case.
BTW, it's a coinflip when the money goes in, 50/50, JTd either hits his hand or he doesn't. Don't give me that over 1 million hands X is favored BS, Sponger is only playing one hand. Duh.
waffle
11-28-2005, 07:44 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Oh the hypocrisy. Diablo busts Mason's ass over an error but then can't own up to a massive mistake like this. Though in El D's defense, he's not quibbling over semantics or retreating from his former position, he is instead employing a strategy of increasing belligerence to make his case.
[/ QUOTE ]
shut up nit, and get a sense of humor.
Burno
11-28-2005, 07:53 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Oh the hypocrisy. Diablo busts Mason's ass over an error but then can't own up to a massive mistake like this. Though in El D's defense, he's not quibbling over semantics or retreating from his former position, he is instead employing a strategy of increasing belligerence to make his case.
[/ QUOTE ]
shut up nit, and get a sense of humor.
[/ QUOTE ]
Quoted so you can't edit once you finish reading my post.
chuddo
11-28-2005, 09:16 AM
give me the made hand everytime.
donkeys always draw.
Ulysses
11-28-2005, 10:17 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
Irony at its finest. Yep, Barron, you've once again successfully defended your "most gullible" title.
Ulysses
11-28-2005, 10:18 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Oh the hypocrisy. Diablo busts Mason's ass over an error but then can't own up to a massive mistake like this. Though in El D's defense, he's not quibbling over semantics or retreating from his former position, he is instead employing a strategy of increasing belligerence to make his case.
[/ QUOTE ]
shut up nit, and get a sense of humor.
[/ QUOTE ]
Barron?
waffle
11-28-2005, 10:47 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Quoted so you can't edit once you finish reading my post.
[/ QUOTE ]
i concede: my previous post has no merit and detracts from this thread. so does this one. [censored].
Chobohoya
11-28-2005, 12:14 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Oh the hypocrisy. Diablo busts Mason's ass over an error but then can't own up to a massive mistake like this. Though in El D's defense, he's not quibbling over semantics or retreating from his former position, he is instead employing a strategy of increasing belligerence to make his case.
[/ QUOTE ]
shut up nit, and get a sense of humor.
[/ QUOTE ]
Quoted so you can't edit once you finish reading my post.
[/ QUOTE ]
"lol"
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
[/ QUOTE ]
The new insta-quote button is da sh1znizzl3!
[/ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/confused.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
See, all I need to do is click "Quote" at the the top of each post, and it automatically quotes the entire post with the quote boxes and everything.
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think that's new.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well it's new to me.
[/ QUOTE ]
wtf are you guys using for equity?
i put this through pokerstove
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 17.3232 % 82.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 82.6768 % 17.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't get it...
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, you're an underdog with 22 vs his straight flush draw + 2 overcards.
[/ QUOTE ]
No he isn't? What the [censored] are you talking about?
Look at the flop, he has jack high, I have a pair.
Btw...
*** You are ignoring this user ***
Buh-bye
[/ QUOTE ]
Your in luck Sponger god told me to help the ignorant today. Get a FREE copy of pokerstove and run the hand. Enlightenment is only a mouse click away. /images/graemlins/cool.gif
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
Your F@#$%$@ killing me /images/graemlins/laugh.gif
I would of called with a suited connector
MrBig30
11-28-2005, 03:25 PM
****** FLAME ******
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
[/ QUOTE ]
The new insta-quote button is da sh1znizzl3!
[/ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/confused.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
See, all I need to do is click "Quote" at the the top of each post, and it automatically quotes the entire post with the quote boxes and everything.
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think that's new.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well it's new to me.
[/ QUOTE ]
wtf are you guys using for equity?
i put this through pokerstove
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 17.3232 % 82.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 82.6768 % 17.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
nice1
[/ QUOTE ]
ty
[/ QUOTE ]
I believe strongly that Cardplayer skewed its pot odds caculator to take into account the average riggedness of online poker. I have no idea how else they could have JT as a favourite over 22.
[/ QUOTE ]
I think Cardplayer must grant villain a few outs for folding equity...very sophisticated bit of software (although obviously not functioning properly)
avisco01
11-28-2005, 03:51 PM
Any idiot knows that JT suited heads up is a SIGNIFICANT underdog to a pair lower than tens. A pair of twos usually has AT BEST one overcard against it. This is a bad beat if I've ever seen one, you guys need to re-evaluate your hand rankings obviously... The fact that he had a STRAIGHT FLUSH DRAW is insignificant, as the jack made him a bigger pair... I mean, there are only THREE jacks left in the deck, what are the odds that Villain would catch a JACK on the river?
Seriously though, one question for OP, what would you do if you had your opponents hand and you flopped a straight flush draw, would you fold, obviously knowing that you're beat, and if you wind up winning you will have dished out a "bad beat," thus folding is best because AT THE MOMENT you don't have the best hand and making the best hand is likely, but not guaranteed, or would you call knowing that you're a FAVORITE against almost any hand against you? I think the choice is clear, and YOU need to understand that this is in no way a "suckout."
[ QUOTE ]
So I'm playing a HU SNG on pokerstars and I pick up 2 /images/graemlins/spade.gif2 /images/graemlins/club.gif, Villian has about 1700 chips to my 1300. Blinds are 10/20
I make the standard 3bb raise. Villian calls.
Flop is 4 /images/graemlins/heart.gif8 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif9 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif and Villian Pushes.
Now, I haven't played that many hands with Villian, but he is extremely agressive and I don't think he has much. So I make the call, and sure enough he has J /images/graemlins/diamond.gifT /images/graemlins/diamond.gif! Sweet!
Turn is a blank, and River is a T /images/graemlins/club.gif
Just another example of me making an incredible read with a marginal hand, and having some stupid moron suckout on me. God I [censored] hate poker.
[/ QUOTE ]
this story is 100 times better if it goes turn 4 river 8... fish!!!
stinkypete
11-28-2005, 04:56 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]I know what after the flop, the villain is losing... however he has the odds to win the hand, what's the problem?
[/ QUOTE ]
ANY PAIR IS WAY BETTER THAN JACK-HIGH! HOW F'ING HARD IS THAT TO UNDERSTAND? DO YOU EVEN KNOW THE RULES OF POKER? GODDAMMIT THIS IS GETTING OLD.
[/ QUOTE ]The villain has 21 outs on both the turn and the river, goddamn it! Do you know what this means?
[/ QUOTE ]
Sponger has a pair.
His opponent has Jack-high.
DO THE MATH. WHO HAS THE BETTER HAND? THIS IS NOT ROCKET SCIENCE!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
i don't understand this. how'd you get to 15,000 posts on this forum?? i thought you were a respected poster here??? you're wrong and these other guys with 10 or 12 posts are right!! you're gonna feel pretty embarrassed when you realize your mistake!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
and i though I WAS GULLIBLE, lol.
Barron
[/ QUOTE ]
what are you trying to say, barron? that diablo isn't wrong??? or that he was just joking??? puh-leeeeze. i don't buy that for a second! maybe he has finally realized his error and feels really silly now, so he'll try to pass it off as another one of his "jokes," but he was OBVIOUSLY serious at first.
this is your chance to mock him mercilessly on his big mistake! if i were you, i'd pursue it with extreme aggressivity! go get 'im, barron!
[/ QUOTE ]
The new insta-quote button is da sh1znizzl3!
[/ QUOTE ]
/images/graemlins/confused.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
See, all I need to do is click "Quote" at the the top of each post, and it automatically quotes the entire post with the quote boxes and everything.
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't think that's new.
[/ QUOTE ]
Well it's new to me.
[/ QUOTE ]
wtf are you guys using for equity?
i put this through pokerstove
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 17.3232 % 82.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 82.6768 % 17.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
nice1
[/ QUOTE ]
ty
[/ QUOTE ]
I believe strongly that Cardplayer skewed its pot odds caculator to take into account the average riggedness of online poker. I have no idea how else they could have JT as a favourite over 22.
[/ QUOTE ]
I think Cardplayer must grant villain a few outs for folding equity...very sophisticated bit of software (although obviously not functioning properly)
[/ QUOTE ]
this thread needs to be wider
EnderW27
11-28-2005, 04:58 PM
Look, there seems to be a lot of debate on this subject and, in my opinion, it's all for naught.
A number of respected posters are saying that Sponger has a pair. And really, that's a pretty fair analysis. A pair can beat a lot of things. Jack high for instance.
But then other people are trying to bring math into this equation. As if a bunch of numbers on a page can possibly show what's in your opponent's soul! Unless you're talking about reverse implied folding odds I don't need to hear the math.
So here's a solution. You're both right. Each hand had a 50% equity on the flop. Both hands had two outcomes: it would win or it would lose. Ergo, 50% of the time one or the other happens.
Both players played perfectly. Winning poker isn't much better than a coinflip anyway.
Justin A
11-28-2005, 05:14 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
So I'm playing a HU SNG on pokerstars and I pick up 2 /images/graemlins/spade.gif2 /images/graemlins/club.gif, Villian has about 1700 chips to my 1300. Blinds are 10/20
I make the standard 3bb raise. Villian calls.
Flop is 4 /images/graemlins/heart.gif8 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif9 /images/graemlins/diamond.gif and Villian Pushes.
Now, I haven't played that many hands with Villian, but he is extremely agressive and I don't think he has much. So I make the call, and sure enough he has J /images/graemlins/diamond.gifT /images/graemlins/diamond.gif! Sweet!
Turn is a blank, and River is a T /images/graemlins/club.gif
Just another example of me making an incredible read with a marginal hand, and having some stupid moron suckout on me. God I [censored] hate poker.
[/ QUOTE ]
this story is 100 times better if it goes turn 4 river 8... fish!!!
[/ QUOTE ]
Story? This is a real hand.
beset7
11-28-2005, 05:21 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Look, there seems to be a lot of debate on this subject and, in my opinion, it's all for naught.
A number of respected posters are saying that Sponger has a pair. And really, that's a pretty fair analysis. A pair can beat a lot of things. Jack high for instance.
But then other people are trying to bring math into this equation. As if a bunch of numbers on a page can possibly show what's in your opponent's soul! Unless you're talking about reverse implied folding odds I don't need to hear the math.
So here's a solution. You're both right. Each hand had a 50% equity on the flop. Both hands had two outcomes: it would win or it would lose. Ergo, 50% of the time one or the other happens.
Both players played perfectly. Winning poker isn't much better than a coinflip anyway.
[/ QUOTE ]
omg.
EnderW27
11-28-2005, 05:34 PM
I know. Pretty spiffy analysis, huh? Sort of sums the debate right up don't you think?
[ QUOTE ]
I know. Pretty spiffy analysis, huh? Sort of sums the debate right up don't you think?
[/ QUOTE ]
god this thread rules.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]
imported_CaseClosed326
11-29-2005, 12:24 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]WTF?
[/ QUOTE ]
[/ QUOTE ]
Sweet
kurosh
11-29-2005, 12:38 AM
Just because I'm a nice guy and don't want anyone to get banned, don't abuse the quote function because people have been banned in the past for quoting too much.
peritonlogon
11-29-2005, 01:27 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Any idiot knows that JT suited heads up is a SIGNIFICANT underdog to a pair lower than tens. A pair of twos usually has AT BEST one overcard against it. This is a bad beat if I've ever seen one, you guys need to re-evaluate your hand rankings obviously... The fact that he had a STRAIGHT FLUSH DRAW is insignificant, as the jack made him a bigger pair... I mean, there are only THREE jacks left in the deck, what are the odds that Villain would catch a JACK on the river?
Seriously though, one question for OP, what would you do if you had your opponents hand and you flopped a straight flush draw, would you fold, obviously knowing that you're beat, and if you wind up winning you will have dished out a "bad beat," thus folding is best because AT THE MOMENT you don't have the best hand and making the best hand is likely, but not guaranteed, or would you call knowing that you're a FAVORITE against almost any hand against you? I think the choice is clear, and YOU need to understand that this is in no way a "suckout."
[/ QUOTE ]
I think we've gone over this in this post, but I'll repeat, a pair beats jack high. Period. If Sponger had jack high and his opponent had a pair, then Sponger would be giving the bad beat, Duh.
Well I see that the forum has already addressed the fact that you were, in fact, the mathematical underdog to win that hand. On the flop when the cards were revealed you should be wishing yourself "Good luck," because you need it against 21 outs twice and the possibility of a counterfeit. GRRR!
Per usual (and I'm guilty sometimes), most have justified this call with numbers.
Let me just say that you did not in fact make an incredible read with a marginal hand--you in fact made a poor decision.
They don't appreciate your blasphemy or your censored diction.
STOP CRYING WHEN YOU GET YOUR MONEY IN, ALBEIT AHEAD, WHEN YOU WERE A 2.5-1 UNDERDOG!
This moron's call with J high was as questionable as Tom Cruise's sexuality, and my ex-wife's fidelity...that's what i hate about pokerstars, that always happens, thats why i only play on AP now. I am not a mean person, and i dont harbor bad feelings for anyone, but i hope that XXXX who called you contracts a terminal illness and dies soon after...
just stay strong, bad beats go both ways.
peritonlogon
11-29-2005, 06:56 PM
[ QUOTE ]
This moron's call with J high was as questionable as Tom Cruise's sexuality, and my ex-wife's fidelity...that's what i hate about pokerstars, that always happens, thats why i only play on AP now. I am not a mean person, and i dont harbor bad feelings for anyone, but i hope that XXXX who called you contracts a terminal illness and dies soon after...
just stay strong, bad beats go both ways.
[/ QUOTE ]
Here here brother
rusty090
11-29-2005, 07:00 PM
Wait, I thought the guy who had Jack high made the push first.
jman220
11-29-2005, 07:02 PM
Yes, and then Sponger made an awesome read by calling with his pocket 2's. He knew Villain didn't have crap, and he lost anyway. [censored]!
peritonlogon
11-29-2005, 07:07 PM
I only have one thing to say about this thread. If you don't want to feel like a jack-hole, or be thought of as one, please read the whole thing before commenting. Of course, I don't really mind if you just feed the fire... It doesn't seem to get old.
[ QUOTE ]
give me the made hand everytime.
donkeys alwasy draw.
[/ QUOTE ]
FYP
(my first FYP evar)
P.S. Tough beat Sponger. I guess some people like being 80% to 1.
mindflayer
12-06-2005, 01:47 PM
Koko is a really smart gorilla which I think is much smarter than a Stupid Bluffing Idiot. So don't be insulting Koko. Koko get MAD.
peritonlogon
12-19-2005, 08:05 PM
BUMP
My God man - you had a PAIR!! Heads up even! What took you so long to get your chips out there? What are the odds your opponent had a pair, too? You get pocket twos preflop heads up, there's only one option. ALL IN, BABY!!! Sure, they'll suck out every once in a while, but with God, Mom, baseball, apple pie and a bottle of whiskey on your side, you'll always come out ahead in the long run.
BlackRain
12-20-2005, 08:00 AM
obv best thread evar!!1
That guy had THE NUT draw! and even his pairs beat you to boot. This is an easy call. JT suited is favored over 22. This post doesn't take into account that maybe he had you read for something like AK. Standard raise from you does not scare him out of pot preflop.
Exactly, He has a TON of outs. Any diamond, Queen, 7, 10, J, not to metion all the cards that improve his hand after the turn, ie pairing the board.
Actually I'm pretty sure that J10 sutied against Low pairs is favored pre-flop. Tough luck.
mgsimpleton
12-20-2005, 02:12 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 72.3232 % 72.32% 00.00% { JdTd }
Hand 2: 27.6768 % 27.68% 00.00% { 2c2s }
[/ QUOTE ]
What is this crap?
Let me explain this simply for you retards.
SPONGER HAS A PAIR ALREADY!
HIS OPPONENT ONLY HAS JACK-HIGH. JACK HIGH!!!!!!!!
[/ QUOTE ]I hope you are kidding.
[/ QUOTE ]
http://www.wedoitallvegas.com/Rank_Of_Poker_Hands_Chart.asp
[/ QUOTE ]
classic. f'in classic.
I'm amazed people still post serious replies.
jman220
12-21-2005, 09:24 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Exactly, He has a TON of outs. Any diamond, Queen, 7, 10, J, not to metion all the cards that improve his hand after the turn, ie pairing the board.
Actually I'm pretty sure that J10 sutied against Low pairs is favored pre-flop. Tough luck.
[/ QUOTE ]
YOU ARE A MORAN AMONGST MORANS.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.