PDA

View Full Version : How bad is this laydown?

11-26-2005, 03:37 PM
PokerStars Game #3163450994: Tournament #15653383, Hold'em No Limit - Level III (25/50) - 2005/11/26 - 12:28:17 (ET)
Table '15653383 1' Seat #5 is the button
Seat 1: goochman79 (1715 in chips)
Seat 2: little momo (2265 in chips)
Seat 3: Fresh8306 (1100 in chips)
Seat 4: 4OOZ (890 in chips)
Seat 5: lakeday (1320 in chips)
Seat 6: LadyAceHigh (1650 in chips)
Seat 7: Swatkiller (2045 in chips)
Seat 8: bogaras (1220 in chips)
Seat 9: hump68 (1295 in chips)
LadyAceHigh: posts small blind 25
Swatkiller: posts big blind 50
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to little momo [Jd Td]
bogaras: calls 50
hump68: folds
goochman79: calls 50
little momo: calls 50
Fresh8306: calls 50
4OOZ: raises 840 to 890 and is all-in
lakeday: folds
LadyAceHigh: calls 865
Swatkiller: folds
bogaras: folds
goochman79: folds
little momo: folds
Fresh8306: folds
tigerite
11-26-2005, 03:38 PM
It's obvious. What the hell are you on? You're not the next Phil Hellmuth just for folding this, you should have folded in the first place and not limped in fact, but limping isn't as terrible as calling TWO ALL INS would be.

Jesus come on get a clue, this is a fold every time. NOT EVEN CLOSE.
11-26-2005, 03:50 PM
I don't think limping is bad, if it's a passive table.

But there's no question about whether to call the all-in or not...

I would only call if I had a hot girl in bed waiting for me.... in fact, I might just check "post and fold" and logout.
tigerite
11-26-2005, 03:51 PM
I only said 'should', meaning, 'most times this is a fold'. Yes of course, there's the odd occasion when you should limp this, but I don't like it from MP very much at all.
Uppercut
11-26-2005, 03:55 PM
This is an auto-fold, dude. You have a Jack-high!
bjb23
11-26-2005, 03:59 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think limping is bad, if it's a passive table.


[/ QUOTE ]

yeah but if op feels the urge to call in this situation with an allin and coldcall ahead with his JTs then surely he should be folding rather than limping to avoid situations where he would otherwise donk off his chips.

but i agree, for someone that is postflop savvy i dont mind the pf limp with relatively deep stacks.
bones
11-26-2005, 04:03 PM
It's an easy call after the 2 pushes. Call it, get broke, stop posting.
11-26-2005, 04:05 PM
Are you serious?
11-26-2005, 04:10 PM
This isn't a serious question is it
littlebu
11-26-2005, 04:24 PM
Thanks I have a new name for my buddy list
handsome
11-26-2005, 04:29 PM
Dude, JTs... that's like a Royal Flush type hand. And what about those TTT/JJJ flops? I can't believe you folded.
bawcerelli
11-26-2005, 04:53 PM
i haven't read any replies, but this is an auto muck. are you a gimmick account?
bawcerelli
11-26-2005, 05:08 PM
for kicks i tried to run this through sngpt, but can't seem to get it to work. it won't allow you to set it so you're calling more than 1 player all in.
Afterh0urs
11-26-2005, 05:58 PM
Clear fold.

But, if the call of the 890 were putting the second player all in as well, then my personal decision changes to call.

And judging from my read on the OP(which I concede isn't based on too much), he isn't at the level where he should even be considering a call, but I guarantee for a player who knows how to utilize proper SitnGo aggression, calling the allins here wouldn't be nearly as -EV as you guys seem to think it is.
tigerite
11-26-2005, 05:59 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Clear fold.

But, if the call of the 890 were putting the second player all in as well, then my personal decision changes to call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh jesus.
bawcerelli
11-26-2005, 08:09 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Clear fold.

But, if the call of the 890 were putting the second player all in as well, then my personal decision changes to call.

And judging from my read on the OP(which I concede isn't based on too much), he isn't at the level where he should even be considering a call, but I guarantee for a player who knows how to utilize proper SitnGo aggression, calling the allins here wouldn't be nearly as -EV as you guys seem to think it is.

[/ QUOTE ]


bwahahahahahahahahahaahhaah rofl waffle
utmt40
11-26-2005, 08:13 PM
[ QUOTE ]
It's obvious. What the hell are you on? You're not the next Phil Hellmuth just for folding this, you should have folded in the first place and not limped in fact, but limping isn't as terrible as calling TWO ALL INS would be.

Jesus come on get a clue, this is a fold every time. NOT EVEN CLOSE.

[/ QUOTE ]
adanthar
11-26-2005, 08:27 PM
San Dimas high school football rules