PDA

View Full Version : What are the 5 best sticky bonuses for BJ?

MrEngenic
11-17-2005, 09:04 AM
I've decided to hit 5 sticky bonuses of 100 $ each this weekend so I looked through the terms and condition of these casinos today:

http://www.casinoexploit.com/sticky-bonus.html

Most of them sucked compared to the conditions stated on the page above.

So, if anyone could tell me 5 good sticky bonuses with max 100 $ deposit, low WR and BJ allowed I would be really grateful. Post here or PM me.
jzpiano14
11-17-2005, 01:56 PM
Casino Del Rio, Europa Casino, Casino Tropez, Vegas Red and Golden Palace are probably your best choices
Homer
11-17-2005, 05:57 PM
Whatever you do, please don't sign up through that [censored]'s links.
MrEngenic
11-18-2005, 07:13 AM
Why, whats wrong with that?
OrianasDaad
11-18-2005, 10:39 AM
I don't know anything about the poster, but I found the site to be very informative.

I do however, respect Homer as a more-than-legit poster, and would likely take his word on reputation alone.
roundest
11-18-2005, 01:02 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know anything about the poster, but I found the site to be very informative.

I do however, respect Homer as a more-than-legit poster, and would likely take his word on reputation alone.

[/ QUOTE ]

He has 3 or 4 casinos on his list that are blacklisted elsewhere. Indio, Grand Online, Merlin's, one more I think.
aargh57
11-18-2005, 01:11 PM
I know that at bonuswhores.com the forum S.W.A.T. team there really discourages going to Casino's from sites such as these (as well as from links posted at the BW forums). I think there rationale is that they don't want the Casino's to get wind of people like us taking advantage of their bonuses. I know it sounds kind of cheesy but usually what I do is find the info from these sites and then just type in their adress myself or search for them. I know it's kind of snubbing the guy that put the work into the list but I think that the fear is that casino's are starting to crack down on bonuses and that sites like these are contributing to this crackdown. Homer may also have a very legitamite reason that has nothing to do with this.
Homer
11-18-2005, 05:26 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Why, whats wrong with that?

[/ QUOTE ]

When that site first started, a lot of the information was taken word for word from BW, with no credit given. The site does seem to be a little better now, but I still don't believe an underhanded person like that should be rewarded with a signup. Obviously your decision, though.