Who has the most posts?

I am a memeber of another forum that uses this same software. The only difference is there, there is a "user list" option and you can sort by post count to see who wastes the most time. lol

Just curious if anyone knew who had the most and how much that is.

Thanks.

(and yes, I am bored right now) /images/graemlins/smirk.gif

[Sponger15SB]

Dynasty did a post about this a while back. Maybe things have changed and he can repost using his super mod abilities to find these things out? Either that or you'll be [censored]?

FYI, its JaketheBake with like 17000, but thankfully he is [censored] and he doesn't post much with his new account.

I think you need at least 10,000 to make the top 20.

[daryn]

what happened to jake anyway, did i miss something?

[swede123]

What is Jake's new handle, by the way?

Swede

[r3vbr]

el diablo

[Sponger15SB]

[ QUOTE ]
what happened to jake anyway, did i miss something?

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm not 100% sure what ended up happening, but he has make a few posts as "BaketheJake" in the B&M forum under some magoo trip reports or whatever.

[SL__72]

Its BakeTheJake or something like that. What did he get censored for anyway?

[CrazyEyez]

[ QUOTE ]
Its BakeTheJake or something like that. What did he get censored for anyway?

[/ QUOTE ]
I didn't notice that he ever got [censored], just that he never posted after the vegas debacle. I may have missed something though.

[samjjones]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Its BakeTheJake or something like that. What did he get censored for anyway?

[/ QUOTE ]
I didn't notice that he ever got [censored], just that he never posted after the vegas debacle. I may have missed something though.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm also unaware of this. And I think El Diablo is tops if you combine his two accounts.

[ QUOTE ]
I didn't notice that he ever got [censored], just that he never posted after the vegas debacle. I may have missed something though.

[/ QUOTE ]
I feel like I miss everything. I never know what's going on. Pretty sure everyone's in on the secret except me.

[canis582]

Debacle? Story please.

[slickpoppa]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Its BakeTheJake or something like that. What did he get censored for anyway?

[/ QUOTE ]
I didn't notice that he ever got [censored], just that he never posted after the vegas debacle. I may have missed something though.

[/ QUOTE ]
I'm also unaware of this. And I think El Diablo is tops if you combine his two accounts.

[/ QUOTE ]

He has two accounts?

[captZEEbo1]

wasn't there some survivor thing or something where they'd vote off someone?

[namknils]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Its BakeTheJake or something like that. What did he get censored for anyway?

[/ QUOTE ]
I didn't notice that he ever got [censored], just that he never posted after the vegas debacle. I may have missed something though.

[/ QUOTE ]

Vegas debacle? What happened, and why would it affect him posting anymore?

[CrazyEyez]

[ QUOTE ]
Debacle? Story please.

[/ QUOTE ]
Something about a c*ckblock with mslif/shant/jason_t or something. Sounded way overblown to me.

[samjjones]

No, he has the one now. IIRC, he had another name once upon a time...

[Aloysius]

[ QUOTE ]
No, he has the one now. IIRC, he had another name once upon a time...

[/ QUOTE ]

Ulysses was a great cash game strategy poster before he turned into El Diablo and spends all his time on OOT /images/graemlins/mad.gif

[slickpoppa]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No, he has the one now. IIRC, he had another name once upon a time...

[/ QUOTE ]

Ulysses was a great cash game strategy poster before he turned into El Diablo and spends all his time on OOT /images/graemlins/mad.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

El D still posts in MHNL fairly frequently

[Aloysius]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No, he has the one now. IIRC, he had another name once upon a time...

[/ QUOTE ]

Ulysses was a great cash game strategy poster before he turned into El Diablo and spends all his time on OOT /images/graemlins/mad.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

El D still posts in MHNL fairly frequently

[/ QUOTE ]

No you're right he does.

And maybe this is before OOT took off - but back in the day Ulysses posted a ridiculous amount of strategy posts (all awesome), I think more than El Diablo does.

[ChristinaB]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

I'm also unaware of this. And I think El Diablo is tops if you combine his two accounts.

[/ QUOTE ]

He has two accounts?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's only one account. He did a name change way back in 2004 before they disallowed name changes.

[tdarko]

[ QUOTE ]
No you're right he does.

And maybe this is before OOT took off - but back in the day Ulysses posted a ridiculous amount of strategy posts (all awesome), I think more than El Diablo does.

[/ QUOTE ]
split the mid/hi forum and he would post more.

[Aloysius]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
No you're right he does.

And maybe this is before OOT took off - but back in the day Ulysses posted a ridiculous amount of strategy posts (all awesome), I think more than El Diablo does.

[/ QUOTE ]
split the mid/hi forum and he would post more.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ah - I see. Well, anyway he plays way higher than me for it to be super relevant to my game - I just miss the days when great Ulysses strat posts (Fossilman too) occurred with very high frequency...

[tdarko]

[ QUOTE ]
but thankfully he is [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]
he wasn't [censored]

One reason I ask this is because the other forum took away the feature that displays the user's post count next to his post. They said that a lot of people where "post whoring" and posting all over the place with no content to try to get a high count.

Seems silly why anyone really cares about post count enough to cheat to make it higher. I just always thought the post count feature was a nice way to see who spent the most time contributing to the site. I am not really surprised though. This other forum is more strict and frowns on any swears words also. Kinda tame, imo.

[MelK]

Isn't jakethebake's plan obvious?

He has about 19,850 posts, way ahead of the number 2 contestant. He will wait until someone gets to about 19,700 posts and someone here points out how close the contest to 20,000 posts is going to be. Then jake will post like heck and win the coveted title of first to reach 20,000 posts, and surpass ThaSaltCracka in the hearts and minds of OOT. /images/graemlins/grin.gif

[Dynasty]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
but thankfully he is [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]
he wasn't [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes he was. This is from his profile (viewable by mods only).

banned by [censored], almost 20k posts without one once of content.

When jakethebake e-mailed me several days later, I lifted the banned temporarily under the condition that he contact both [censored] and Mat Sklansky immediately. [censored] was already on vacation at the time.


It doesn't seem possible for mods to view a top posters list. The whole Admin section is different after the most recent upgrade. In fact, the Admin sections seems to be the main reason for the upgrade

[Shajen]

Boo to [censored] for that.
/images/graemlins/frown.gif

[MonkeeMan]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
but thankfully he is [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]
he wasn't [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes he was. This is from his profile (viewable by mods only).

banned by [censored], almost 20k posts without one once of content.


[/ QUOTE ]

Nice banning comment.

First - the obvious misspelling.
Second - I'm betting [censored] didn't read all the posts to know this.
Third - the statement is completely biased.
Fourth - who is [censored] to think he can make such a determination for the readers of and contributors to OOT?

[HopeydaFish]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
but thankfully he is [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]
he wasn't [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes he was. This is from his profile (viewable by mods only).

banned by [censored], almost 20k posts without one once of content.


[/ QUOTE ]

That's really pathetic. Jake made *tons* of content-rich posts. His replies with low content were no worse and no better than 99% of the other posters on here, and I can't recall him ever posting anything that I'd consider ban-worthy.

[Yeti]

[ QUOTE ]
Boo to [censored] for that.
/images/graemlins/frown.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

[splashpot]

[ QUOTE ]
That's really pathetic. Jake made *tons* of content-rich posts. His replies with low content were no worse and no better than 99% of the other posters on here, and I can't recall him ever posting anything that I'd consider ban-worthy.

[/ QUOTE ]
I dunno about OOT, but in the Book forum, pretty much EVERY time someone asked for a NL book suggestion, he would like to the "Big Book of Masterbation".

[jackdaniels]

[ QUOTE ]
Boo to [censored] for that.
/images/graemlins/frown.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

[Freakin]

[ QUOTE ]
Boo to [censored] for that.
/images/graemlins/frown.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

[Sponger15SB]

[ QUOTE ]
Yes he was. This is from his profile (viewable by mods only).

[/ QUOTE ]

Can I be a mod? I just want to know all these crazy powers and look at the mod forum and stuff. I promise I won't do anything else but look!

Everything is so mysterious I think we need an overview by the people.

[Sponger15SB]

[ QUOTE ]
Fourth - who is [censored] to think he can make such a determination for the readers of and contributors to OOT?

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, you really haven't been paying attention much around here.

[tdarko]

[ QUOTE ]
I dunno about OOT, but in the Book forum, pretty much EVERY time someone asked for a NL book suggestion, he would like to the "Big Book of Masterbation".

[/ QUOTE ]
bahahahahaha. that. is. gold.

[B Dids]

This thread is [censored] noob city, and I'm not the kinda of person who says [censored] like this.

[Klepton]

i couldn't figure out why i was so less irritated when i view OOT, now i know.

thanks [censored].

[MonkeeMan]

[ QUOTE ]
Wow, you really haven't been paying attention much around here.

[/ QUOTE ]

I usually avoid the "censored" and "[censored]" threads, but this time I got sucked in. And yes, I've been censored (but not for this thread (so far)).

[Voltron87]

does anyone else ever notice how there are tons of people who regged in 2002, 2004, and 2005 but very few from 2003?

[ThaSaltCracka]

I think it is currently me.

[MonkeeMan]

[ QUOTE ]
I think it is currently me.

[/ QUOTE ]

not unless they deleted Jake's.

[BradleyT]

I'm an '03er! But ya there's hardly any around.

[MelK]

[ QUOTE ]
I think it is currently me.

[/ QUOTE ]

jakethebake
Posts: 19847

ThaSaltCracka
Posts: 16457

Quick, post another 3,000 posts and catch up.

[diebitter]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think it is currently me.

[/ QUOTE ]

jakethebake
Posts: 19847

ThaSaltCracka
Posts: 16457

Quick, post another 3,000 posts and catch up.

[/ QUOTE ]

Does this mean we have a new 'resident popsy'?

[Jack of Arcades]

I personally like jake (he's a pretty caring individual, he even pmed me after rita to see what was up since I hadn't posted in a couple days). However, he was always a boom or bust poster that posted a lot of crap with a little bit of a gold every once in a while. I'm not terribly upset about the banning, and I think we all knew [censored] would do it anyway.

[Blarg]

I didn't mind jake. There are a lot worse posters here than him, like maybe half of them, and they were often decent. I do think that after, oh, the 5000th posting of the picture of cows in response to virtually any post someone else made, the very minimal funniness of it had worn pretty damn thin. I think I might have been alone on that, actually. But his regular posts seemed okay to me. I don't think OOT is any better for his being booted. At least now that the cow pictures have stopped.

[kenberman]

[ QUOTE ]
does anyone else ever notice how there are tons of people who regged in 2002, 2004, and 2005 but very few from 2003?

[/ QUOTE ]

hi

this is prolly b/c 2002 is when all the "old" posters had to re-register, and 2003 was really pre-poker boom.

[Homer]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
but thankfully he is [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]
he wasn't [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes he was. This is from his profile (viewable by mods only).

banned by [censored], almost 20k posts without one once of content.

When jakethebake e-mailed me several days later, I lifted the banned temporarily under the condition that he contact both [censored] and Mat Sklansky immediately. [censored] was already on vacation at the time.


It doesn't seem possible for mods to view a top posters list. The whole Admin section is different after the most recent upgrade. In fact, the Admin sections seems to be the main reason for the upgrade

[/ QUOTE ]

Great, unbiased moderation there. What a joke.

[ThinkQuick]

I don't know which alexa stats really matter, I'm sure some people here do, but yah, there was a poker room that led to a twoplustwo boom post 2003.
http://traffic.alexa.com/graph?w=640&h=480&r=2y&y=r&u=twoplustwo.com

[imported_anacardo]

[ QUOTE ]
I didn't mind jake. There are a lot worse posters here than him, like maybe half of them, and they were often decent. I do think that after, oh, the 5000th posting of the picture of cows in response to virtually any post someone else made, the very minimal funniness of it had worn pretty damn thin. I think I might have been alone on that, actually. But his regular posts seemed okay to me. I don't think OOT is any better for his being booted. At least now that the cow pictures have stopped.

[/ QUOTE ]

Was that Jake? I thought that was all Patrick's doing.

[Rockatansky]

[ QUOTE ]
I didn't mind jake. There are a lot worse posters here than him, like maybe half of them, and they were often decent. I do think that after, oh, the 5000th posting of the picture of cows in response to virtually any post someone else made, the very minimal funniness of it had worn pretty damn thin. I think I might have been alone on that, actually. But his regular posts seemed okay to me. I don't think OOT is any better for his being booted. At least now that the cow pictures have stopped.

[/ QUOTE ]

This really gets at the reason why he should have been reprimanded in some way. It's one thing to make 100 posts per day, but it's something else when a percentage of those posts are continually aimed at busting other posters' balls for supposedly cluttering the forum. That being said, there's absolutely no reason to permanently ban Jake.

[B Dids]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
but thankfully he is [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]
he wasn't [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes he was. This is from his profile (viewable by mods only).

banned by [censored], almost 20k posts without one once of content.

When jakethebake e-mailed me several days later, I lifted the banned temporarily under the condition that he contact both [censored] and Mat Sklansky immediately. [censored] was already on vacation at the time.


It doesn't seem possible for mods to view a top posters list. The whole Admin section is different after the most recent upgrade. In fact, the Admin sections seems to be the main reason for the upgrade

[/ QUOTE ]

Great, unbiased moderation there. What a joke.

[/ QUOTE ]

How many people are going to fail to realize that there was never a premise of unbaised moderation in what [censored] was doing.

[miajag81]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I didn't mind jake. There are a lot worse posters here than him, like maybe half of them, and they were often decent. I do think that after, oh, the 5000th posting of the picture of cows in response to virtually any post someone else made, the very minimal funniness of it had worn pretty damn thin. I think I might have been alone on that, actually. But his regular posts seemed okay to me. I don't think OOT is any better for his being booted. At least now that the cow pictures have stopped.

[/ QUOTE ]

Was that Jake? I thought that was all Patrick's doing.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I think the dung pile picture and the hot tub pic account for about 95% of Patrick's post count.

[Homer]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
but thankfully he is [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]
he wasn't [censored]

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes he was. This is from his profile (viewable by mods only).

banned by [censored], almost 20k posts without one once of content.

When jakethebake e-mailed me several days later, I lifted the banned temporarily under the condition that he contact both [censored] and Mat Sklansky immediately. [censored] was already on vacation at the time.


It doesn't seem possible for mods to view a top posters list. The whole Admin section is different after the most recent upgrade. In fact, the Admin sections seems to be the main reason for the upgrade

[/ QUOTE ]

Great, unbiased moderation there. What a joke.

[/ QUOTE ]

How many people are going to fail to realize that there was never a premise of unbaised moderation in what [censored] was doing.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why was he made a moderator, then? And more importantly, why is he still a moderator?

[wayabvpar]

If moderation can't be unbiased, it shouldn't be done at all. As I said a few times in the Paul Phllips thread....

2003'er here. I lurked for a few months before I registered.

[CrazyEyez]

[ QUOTE ]
does anyone else ever notice how there are tons of people who regged in 2002, 2004, and 2005 but very few from 2003?

[/ QUOTE ]
2003 WHAT

[ThaSaltCracka]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
does anyone else ever notice how there are tons of people who regged in 2002, 2004, and 2005 but very few from 2003?

[/ QUOTE ]
2003 WHAT

[/ QUOTE ]Holla

[B Dids]

Your question, and the question below you are for Mat to answer.

Basically, [censored] proposed that he be a mod and ban people as per his desire, the vast majority of OOT posters thought this would be a great idea, Mat agreed and bannings commenced (and OOT got a lot better).

[razor]

[ QUOTE ]
If moderation can't be unbiased, it shouldn't be done at all.

[/ QUOTE ]

[censored] and those that supported his plan were tired of all the crap threads/posts in OOT. By definition his plan was biased against the dumb people starting dumb threads and making dumb posts. It was biased but it made OOT a better place.

[IndieMatty]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
If moderation can't be unbiased, it shouldn't be done at all.

[/ QUOTE ]

[censored] and those that supported his plan were tired of all the crap threads/posts in OOT. By definition his plan was biased against the dumb people starting dumb threads and making dumb posts. It was biased but it made OOT a better place for you and me.

[/ QUOTE ]
We are the world, we are the children, we are the one's that make a better place, so let's start giving....


Thanks Razor, I am singing this as I prep for the gym.

[Ulysses]

[ QUOTE ]
Why was he made a moderator, then? And more importantly, why is he still a moderator?

[/ QUOTE ]

a) Because that type of aggressive moderation was something many people thought would improve OOT.

b) Because it did indeed improve OOT.

[Ulysses]

[ QUOTE ]
as I prep for the gym.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, right. Gym. You're going to Taco Bell, aren't you?

[Sponger15SB]

[ QUOTE ]
FYI, its JaketheBake with like 17000, but thankfully he is [censored] and he doesn't post much with his new account.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm kinda suprised it took 6 days after jake's last and me posting this for many people to realize he was banned.

You didn't even miss him, ha

[Homer]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why was he made a moderator, then? And more importantly, why is he still a moderator?

[/ QUOTE ]

a) Because that type of aggressive moderation was something many people thought would improve OOT.

b) Because it did indeed improve OOT.

[/ QUOTE ]

What a stupid [censored] plan. Anyway, if that's the way it's gonna be, the poster should be banned from oot only. I'm pretty sure that can be done with this software.

[beset7]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Why was he made a moderator, then? And more importantly, why is he still a moderator?

[/ QUOTE ]

a) Because that type of aggressive moderation was something many people thought would improve OOT.

b) Because it did indeed improve OOT.

[/ QUOTE ]

What a stupid [censored] plan. Anyway, if that's the way it's gonna be, the poster should be banned from oot only. I'm pretty sure that can be done with this software.

[/ QUOTE ]

Unfortunately it can't be done currently.

The only thing that can be done is a good-faith exile from the forum whereby the person gets perma-banned if they post in that forum and the moderator notices it.

[Hellrazor]

[ QUOTE ]
If moderation can't be unbiased, it shouldn't be done at all. As I said a few times in the Paul Phllips thread....

2003'er here. I lurked for a few months before I registered.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've been lurking a bit since i registered....

[IndieMatty]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
as I prep for the gym.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, right. Gym. You're going to Taco Bell, aren't you?

[/ QUOTE ]


Correct, the only choice I was making was whether to get two burrito supremes, or the carne asada nachos bell grande.

[offTopic]

[ QUOTE ]
Plus ca change

Plus c'est la meme chose

[/ QUOTE ]

Is that a biased SF Giants fan's opinion?

[mason55]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Plus ca change

Plus c'est la meme chose

[/ QUOTE ]

Is that a biased SF Giants fan's opinion?

[/ QUOTE ]

Nice call

[imported_anacardo]

[ QUOTE ]
Plus ca change

Plus c'est la meme chose

[/ QUOTE ]

You're a [censored] sicko.

Any number of us would be happy to give you a thorough going over, so you've chosen a smart strategy, you [censored] pussy piece of [censored].

[tonypaladino]

[ QUOTE ]
Your question, and the question below you are for Mat to answer.

Basically, [censored] proposed that he be a mod and ban people as per his desire, the vast majority of OOT posters thought this would be a great idea, Mat agreed and bannings commenced (and OOT got a lot better).

[/ QUOTE ]

If by "vast majority" you mean "vocal minority" then I agree.

[CCass]

[ QUOTE ]
If moderation can't be unbiased, it shouldn't be done at all. As I said a few times in the Paul Phllips thread....

2003'er here. I lurked for a few months before I registered.

[/ QUOTE ]

I registered on 8/13/03, so I got you by 2 days.

[bugstud]

winner?

[housenuts]

why was jake banned?

[zephed]

[ QUOTE ]
Boo to [censored] for that.
/images/graemlins/frown.gif

[/ QUOTE ]
Bring back jake.

[imported_anacardo]

He's back. Just a new incarnation, that's all, and he mostly stays away from OOT.

[tonypaladino]

If I know Jake he's lurking here.

I don't know him though. Not at all.

/images/graemlins/grin.gif

[ChipWrecked]

I know that he is, because I've received a PM from him inspired by a post I made; which showed me that jake is cool, and should not have been [censored]. If nothing else, there was debate about jake's posts, which proved some of us got a kick out of his torrent.

As a third shift worker on the Left Coast, jake's arrival in the morning was a welcome sight; it meant my workday was nearing an end.

[censored] [censored].

[Victor]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
does anyone else ever notice how there are tons of people who regged in 2002, 2004, and 2005 but very few from 2003?

[/ QUOTE ]
2003 WHAT

[/ QUOTE ]

fwiw i read the forum and posted somewhat back in the day. but i really dont know what i was doing in 2002. i seriously cant remember it at all. oh well, i assume it was fun.