PDA

View Full Version : $55: Just curious what you guys do with AK


Hornacek
11-12-2005, 08:10 PM
***** Hand History for Game 3026214484 *****
NL Texas Hold'em $50 Buy-in + $5 Entry Fee Trny:17360198 Level:3 Blinds(25/50) - Saturday, November 12, 19:08:23 EDT 2005
Table Table 67936 (Real Money)
Seat 8 is the button
Total number of players : 8
Seat 1: DaDonger12 ( $660 )
Seat 2: mcjockis ( $925 )
Seat 3: HUY_BAM ( $1220 )
Seat 4: UncleBret ( $795 )
Seat 5: colonel70 ( $1870 )
Seat 7: ProGolf66 ( $1965 )
Seat 8: Hornacek14 ( $1020 )
Seat 10: djr5286 ( $1545 )
Trny:17360198 Level:3
Blinds(25/50)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Hornacek14 [ Ad Kc ]
mcjockis folds.
HUY_BAM folds.
UncleBret calls [50].
colonel70 folds.
ProGolf66 folds.
Hornacek14 raises [175].
djr5286 is all-In [1520]
DaDonger12 folds.
UncleBret folds.
Hornacek14 ???


What would you do?

tigerite
11-12-2005, 08:11 PM
Fold. I would probably call with JJ+, perhaps TT+ if I had a read on him as being a complete donk. Or if he was a very solid player, it might even be QQ+. But not AK.

Edit, I would also call with AK if he was a donk who had a loving of Ax, they're easy to spot.

11-12-2005, 08:13 PM
This is the very easy call.

downtown
11-12-2005, 09:19 PM
[ QUOTE ]
This is the very easy call.

[/ QUOTE ]

As your post count rises, I fear that unsuspecting and newer players might listen to you. Nahhh...

To the OP, I usually fold without a read here.

bones
11-12-2005, 09:23 PM
I'd go with my read.

Slim Pickens
11-12-2005, 09:33 PM
I grudgingly fold here unless I had a specific read on him as an overly loose player whose pushing range here includes low PP's and Ax down to maybe 8, not just QQ+.

tigerite
11-12-2005, 09:39 PM
I meant if the guy was very solid I would fold pairs down to QQ+ here. Not sure where you got the bit about the pushee having QQ+ as I didn't mean that, for sure

Slim Pickens
11-12-2005, 09:47 PM
I'm just saying I put most normal 55's players on QQ+ (maybe JJ also) when they make this move, but there are times when I'll read them as having less.

11-12-2005, 09:55 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This is the very easy call.

[/ QUOTE ]

As your post count rises, I fear that unsuspecting and newer players might listen to you. Nahhh...

To the OP, I usually fold without a read here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Who does people always says fold here but in the real game when they play they always do the call? /images/graemlins/confused.gif

microbet
11-12-2005, 10:03 PM
[ QUOTE ]
This is the very easy call.

[/ QUOTE ]

Very nice post, Suited.

11-12-2005, 10:10 PM
i would fold here with no read. i think alot of players go crazy with their AK, AQ holdings.

11-12-2005, 10:51 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This is the very easy call.

[/ QUOTE ]

As your post count rises, I fear that unsuspecting and newer players might listen to you. Nahhh...

To the OP, I usually fold without a read here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Who does people always says fold here but in the real game when they play they always do the call? /images/graemlins/confused.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually, this is a good point.

skipperbob
11-12-2005, 11:18 PM
DjR's overbet indicates small pp to me; question is: "Do you want to call all your chips to race him?...Could be really good news if he has A-Q or A-J....No way he has AA or KK

11-12-2005, 11:21 PM
This is the very easy fold.

bones
11-12-2005, 11:23 PM
[ QUOTE ]
DjR's overbet indicates small pp to me; question is: "Do you want to call all your chips to race him?...Could be really good news if he has A-Q or A-J....No way he has AA or KK

[/ QUOTE ]

Dude, poker content?

11-12-2005, 11:45 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
This is the very easy call.

[/ QUOTE ]

As your post count rises, I fear that unsuspecting and newer players might listen to you. Nahhh...

To the OP, I usually fold without a read here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Who does people always says fold here but in the real game when they play they always do the call? /images/graemlins/confused.gif

[/ QUOTE ]

Actually, this is a good point.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks you. I see many people write "I am g00t enough to lay this down" when you know for sure when they play at the table no one ever lay down the AK.

wuwei
11-13-2005, 12:11 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I'm just saying I put most normal 55's players on QQ+ (maybe JJ also) when they make this move, but there are times when I'll read them as having less.

[/ QUOTE ]

I call this most of the time, and in my experience this is not true for the average 55 player.

bennies
11-13-2005, 07:17 AM
Call. 845 chips to win about 1250 (if the first raiser folds). I don't know if you are a favourite but you are hardly an 8 to 12 dog to his range.

tigerite
11-13-2005, 07:51 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Call. 845 chips to win about 1250 (if the first raiser folds). I don't know if you are a favourite but you are hardly an 8 to 12 dog to his range.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm quite surprised at you bennies. To call this his range has to be greater than TT+. I don't know of many $55ers who push 99 here. Those who do would also push AQ here which is why it's call, but this 8 to 12 business is not really the factor here.. at least not by ICM. Just because SNGPT can't work this out, doesn't mean it can't be calculated..

You actually need to be a 46.5% favourite here, assuming you want any kind of edge at all (I went for 0.4%). So even if he flips over 22, you should actually fold..

Call/win 0.200780
Call/lose 0
Fold 0.089793

bennies
11-13-2005, 08:26 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Call. 845 chips to win about 1250 (if the first raiser folds). I don't know if you are a favourite but you are hardly an 8 to 12 dog to his range.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm quite surprised at you bennies. To call this his range has to be greater than TT+. I don't know of many $55ers who push 99 here. Those who do would also push AQ here which is why it's call, but this 8 to 12 business is not really the factor here.. at least not by ICM. Just because SNGPT can't work this out, doesn't mean it can't be calculated..

You actually need to be a 46.5% favourite here, assuming you want any kind of edge at all (I went for 0.4%). So even if he flips over 22, you should actually fold..

Call/win 0.200780
Call/lose 0
Fold 0.089793


[/ QUOTE ]

Thanks for doing the math. I admit that out of lazyness I've gotten used to think of AK vs underpairs as coin flips - when it is not so. There are nuances to consider. For a random example, while AKo is only 43% against QQ, AKs is 48% against 55.

I also admit that this hand is closer than I first thought it was. Folding looks alright. Basically it all comes down to if we include AQo in villains range. If we do, I think a call is good.

I think I do. (But then again I am a master of table selection /images/graemlins/smile.gif)

Hornacek
11-13-2005, 03:30 PM
Wow I'm gone for a night... thanks for the replies guys.

I did fold; good to see that most people agree with me. I just hate feeling like people are not respecting my raises, but patience is key, I guess.