PDA

View Full Version : MTT forum split?


MicroBob
11-03-2005, 11:25 PM
-- MTT strategy
-- MTT non-strategy Q's and 'sweat'.


Anyone agree?


(note - I don't even come in this forum that much and am hardly a 'regular'. Just tossing out an idea for those of you who ARE regulars)

Exitonly
11-03-2005, 11:30 PM
Meh, then sweat threads wouldnt get seen as much, i dont have a problem with them being mixed in.

C-Dog
11-03-2005, 11:30 PM
I dont agree. And splitting a forum doesnt seem to be that easy. I think the HUSH split should take priority over MTT split.

C-Dog

MLG
11-03-2005, 11:31 PM
I've always been for that.

KneeCo
11-03-2005, 11:31 PM
This has been talked about before.

I don't really like the idea, but I do see the appeal of it, especially for people who don't come to the forum often and drop in only to see a page full of non-useful info.

It's up to the mods I guess. I do think we need to stress that FT sweats are reserved for when you make the FT and I think there are too many **Official** threads.

Lloyd
11-03-2005, 11:31 PM
Almost all threads are already strategy-related. We have a few sweat threads and the rare off-topic or brag thread but I personally don't feel like they are disruptive and in fact are helpful to see how the advice is paying off in real results.

LearnedfromTV
11-03-2005, 11:40 PM
I don't think a split is necessary. I like seeing sweat threads interspersed. I think there *could* be merit in splitting to a Mid-High and Small stakes, but I'm fine with things as they are.

Pat Southern
11-03-2005, 11:40 PM
[ QUOTE ]
Almost all threads are already strategy-related. We have a few sweat threads and the rare off-topic or brag thread but I personally don't feel like they are disruptive and in fact are helpful to see how the advice is paying off in real results.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've always hated the official threads, and they're getting more and more out of control by the day. At first it was reserved for the higher buyin tournaments, now $3 rebuys are getting their own threads, and this (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=0&Number=3855722&an=0&page=0#Post 3855722) takes the cake.

Exitonly
11-03-2005, 11:47 PM
Theres nothign wrong with 'official' threads, but there are getting to be a lot of them.

Maybe cut down to:

40k
45k
Big Sunday Tournies.

??

Lloyd
11-03-2005, 11:49 PM
Personally, I don't even "see" most of them. Meaning I've somehow filtered them out of my scan and ignore (most of) them completely. I think as long as there is fairly wide appeal a thread is okay with me.

MicroBob
11-04-2005, 12:02 AM
i disagree.


i don't see why one type of 'sweat' or 'official' thread should be allowed an not another.


Not everyone likes to play the 10+1 rebuy on Stars.
While others like to play the 3+0's.


If there really is some benefit to having the 'official' threads where 2+2'ers can get together and share their hands, experiences, and updates...then discriminating against the 3+0 'official' threads would be akin to saying micro-limit players aren't allowed to post strategy posts.


we all started somewhere.
I started in freerolls and $1 stars tourneys.


Just think that IF sweat threads are going to be allowed, then saying "yes, but only sweat threads for THESE tourneys" is a bit unfair.



Lets say a bunch of 2+2'ers got into one of the Party 20k freerolls that they're doing (for their 3-billionth hand promotion).
The value of this freeroll is about that of a $6 buy-in.
It certainly isn't big money.
But I see no reason why a bunch of 2+2'ers shouldn't be allowed to have their own thread about it just because it's so much lower than where many other 2+2'ers play.


(I know I've made this argument before....but that was a few months ago....sorry for repeating myself).

Exitonly
11-04-2005, 12:07 AM
I wasn't saying anytyhing about 'sweat' threads.

They are two different things..

the "official" ones, are usually tournaments with lots of 2+2ers playing


the "sweat" threads, are any tournament w/ a 2p2er at the FT.


I have no probelm with Micro FT sweat threads (and really i hav eno problem with whatever 'official' threads either, but i'd be fine with less of those)

MicroBob
11-04-2005, 12:15 AM
yeah...sorry.

when I said 'sweat' I really meant 'official'.

I think of the 'official' threads as 'hey...lets all sweat each other' threads or something like that.


Some think there are 'too many' 'official' threads but I think the lower-stakes players are just as deserving of an 'official' thread as anyone else.