PDA

View Full Version : How much better/worse are the Party 5/10 games than the Bodog games?


ClaytonN
11-02-2005, 06:47 PM
I really have no idea, but a college friend of mine has been playing the 5/10 at Bodog for a while and seems to have an aversion to playing the 5/10 party games, I suppose as a comfort issue. He gets at least 25% rb on Bodog and it's not incredibly easy to get RB on party right now. So that's probably a factor?

Is there anybody who has a lot of hands logged at Bodog AND party out there? If so, how much better/worse is Party compared to Bodog? Thanks.

AZK
11-02-2005, 06:54 PM
bodog games aren't that much different from party. The biggest difference is that party has 6max and bodog doesnt full ring plays the same imo.

ggbman
11-02-2005, 08:16 PM
I looove the party 5-10 6 max. I have put in a decent # of hands there in the last 10 months and it's very beatable. You should have no qualms about playing those games. Basically, most of the players are too passive and you can value bet the crap out of them.

MarkD
11-02-2005, 09:39 PM
Did you play any of the party 5/10 10 handed games? I've got a buddy who has been playing them the last few days and I've watched him a bit too. Looking at the games and hearing him talk about them the 10 handed 5/10 games sound bad. Very tight. When I watched them they seemed worse then the 10 and 15 games, but I only watched for a bit.

Whenever I have played 5/10 6 max the games have seemed fantastic.

B00T
11-02-2005, 10:07 PM
The level of play at the 6max games is much worse than the full handed games. All the gamblers play 6-max.

5-10 full is much more difficult than 5-10 6max at Party. If you are better than 80% of the players at both (assuming you are equally as skilled relative to the field at each game) you'd make more playing 6max.