View Full Version : Are there differant stratagies for differant sites?
I play at sit&gos at 6 diferant sites. At two of these sites I can cash 2 out of 3 times. 3 of the sites 1 out of 3 and then there is Poker Stars where I have never made it to the money.
My statagy is to play tight until 6 players are left then lossen as plyaer are knocked out.
Do diferant stagaties work better at some sites than others?
or am I thinking to much:)
Phix
pergesu
11-02-2005, 12:42 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I play at sit&gos at 6 diferant sites. At two of these sites I can cash 2 out of 3 times.
[/ QUOTE ]
Play at those two sites. Clearly they're monstrously profitable for you, so there's no real reason to play anywhere else.
bluefeet
11-02-2005, 12:49 AM
[ QUOTE ]
At two of these sites I can cash 2 out of 3 times
[/ QUOTE ]
play at these two sites /images/graemlins/wink.gif
seriously? depends. deep stack (PS) vs. short stack (PP) -- there is certainly a little more freedom in the deep stack game for exploiting an assumed post-flop superiority. without the post-flop skills, the deeper stack can actually be detrimental (assuming you participate post-flop too frequently regardless).
6 seated, 9 seated, 10 seated, start chips, blinds structures, etc. do have subtle (sometimes not so) differences. but employing the proper "tight early", "pushbot" late strategy will be relatively effective in most settings.
SammyKid11
11-02-2005, 12:59 AM
[ QUOTE ]
or am I thinking to much:)
[/ QUOTE ]
With the lack of literacy displayed in your post, I find it difficult to believe that you're thinking too much. I also find it hard to believe that you're 67% ITM at any given site unless your sample size is ridiculously small.
First take English, then Statistics, take two Aspirin and call us in the morning.
bawcerelli
11-02-2005, 01:51 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
or am I thinking to much:)
[/ QUOTE ]
With the lack of literacy displayed in your post, I find it difficult to believe that you're thinking too much. I also find it hard to believe that you're 67% ITM at any given site unless your sample size is ridiculously small.
First take English, then Statistics, take two Aspirin and call us in the morning.
[/ QUOTE ]
ouch! no need to be THAT harsh. lol, nh
pooh74
11-02-2005, 02:19 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
At two of these sites I can cash 2 out of 3 times
[/ QUOTE ]
play at these two sites /images/graemlins/wink.gif
seriously? depends. deep stack (PS) vs. short stack (PP) -- there is certainly a little more freedom in the deep stack game for exploiting an assumed post-flop superiority. without the post-flop skills, the deeper stack can actually be detrimental (assuming you participate post-flop too frequently regardless).
6 seated, 9 seated, 10 seated, start chips, blinds structures, etc. do have subtle (sometimes not so) differences. but employing the proper "tight early", "pushbot" late strategy will be relatively effective in most settings.
[/ QUOTE ]
You're too nice...you probably would humor Stanzee too.
SammyKid11
11-02-2005, 02:46 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
or am I thinking to much:)
[/ QUOTE ]
With the lack of literacy displayed in your post, I find it difficult to believe that you're thinking too much. I also find it hard to believe that you're 67% ITM at any given site unless your sample size is ridiculously small.
First take English, then Statistics, take two Aspirin and call us in the morning.
[/ QUOTE ]
ouch! no need to be THAT harsh. lol, nh
[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah - a little harsh...but come on. A typo here and there is one thing. A post like that is just hard to read. And I think if someone doesn't take themselves seriously enough to write competently, I find it hard to believe they'll take poker seriously enough for me to take them seriously.
bigt439
11-02-2005, 02:51 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
or am I thinking to much:)
[/ QUOTE ]
With the lack of literacy displayed in your post, I find it difficult to believe that you're thinking too much. I also find it hard to believe that you're 67% ITM at any given site unless your sample size is ridiculously small.
First take English, then Statistics, take two Aspirin and call us in the morning.
[/ QUOTE ]
ouch! no need to be THAT harsh. lol, nh
[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah - a little harsh...but come on. A typo here and there is one thing. A post like that is just hard to read. And I think if someone doesn't take themselves seriously enough to write competently, I find it hard to believe they'll take poker seriously enough for me to take them seriously.
[/ QUOTE ]
Unless they're serious enough to know you're serious enough to know just how serious serious is. /images/graemlins/confused.gif
bawcerelli
11-02-2005, 03:24 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
or am I thinking to much:)
[/ QUOTE ]
With the lack of literacy displayed in your post, I find it difficult to believe that you're thinking too much. I also find it hard to believe that you're 67% ITM at any given site unless your sample size is ridiculously small.
First take English, then Statistics, take two Aspirin and call us in the morning.
[/ QUOTE ]
ouch! no need to be THAT harsh. lol, nh
[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah - a little harsh...but come on. A typo here and there is one thing. A post like that is just hard to read. And I think if someone doesn't take themselves seriously enough to write competently, I find it hard to believe they'll take poker seriously enough for me to take them seriously.
[/ QUOTE ]
Unless they're serious enough to know you're serious enough to know just how serious serious is. /images/graemlins/confused.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
seriously
SammyKid11
11-02-2005, 03:28 AM
[ QUOTE ]
seriously
[/ QUOTE ]
Actually I'm just joking.
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.