questionguy
06-13-2003, 01:41 PM
I would like to hear your thoughts how to play the following two hands in limit hold'em (the game was typical to loose-passive):
1)I was in bb w/ A9s, someone open-limped from late position and the cutoff and sb also limped so checked and got a freeplay. The flop came A33 rainbow, the sb checked, I bet my top pair/weak kicker, and everyone folded and I won a small pot.
2)I was 2 seats from the button, w/ ATo, a middle position player open-limped, I limped, the cutoff and button folded, the sb limped and the bb checked. The flop came A88 rainbow, everyone checked to me, I bet my top pair-avg kicker and everyone folded and I won a small pot again.
These two hands occurred in the same session and got me thinking that perhaps I should have checked instead of betting in both instances. It seems that by betting I could only win a small pot, but I could lose more than I could win if someone held the trips and ck-called me. If I check, someone else may pickup some kind of hand (either a draw or another paint hits and someone makes two pair- an inferior two-pair to mine). If someone had the trips or an A-higher kicker (unlikely b/c no preflop raise), I'm going to lose anyway, so I may as well check it and allow someone to pickup a 2nd best hand that would warrant calling to showdown.
I bet on flop=I win small amt or I lose medium amt after the trips ck-call me on flop and I get suspicious and then I shutdown and simply ck-call; or
I check on flop=I win medium size pot b/c some1 picks up 2nd best hand or I lose medium size pot (same reasoning as before)
thanks,
quesionguy
1)I was in bb w/ A9s, someone open-limped from late position and the cutoff and sb also limped so checked and got a freeplay. The flop came A33 rainbow, the sb checked, I bet my top pair/weak kicker, and everyone folded and I won a small pot.
2)I was 2 seats from the button, w/ ATo, a middle position player open-limped, I limped, the cutoff and button folded, the sb limped and the bb checked. The flop came A88 rainbow, everyone checked to me, I bet my top pair-avg kicker and everyone folded and I won a small pot again.
These two hands occurred in the same session and got me thinking that perhaps I should have checked instead of betting in both instances. It seems that by betting I could only win a small pot, but I could lose more than I could win if someone held the trips and ck-called me. If I check, someone else may pickup some kind of hand (either a draw or another paint hits and someone makes two pair- an inferior two-pair to mine). If someone had the trips or an A-higher kicker (unlikely b/c no preflop raise), I'm going to lose anyway, so I may as well check it and allow someone to pickup a 2nd best hand that would warrant calling to showdown.
I bet on flop=I win small amt or I lose medium amt after the trips ck-call me on flop and I get suspicious and then I shutdown and simply ck-call; or
I check on flop=I win medium size pot b/c some1 picks up 2nd best hand or I lose medium size pot (same reasoning as before)
thanks,
quesionguy