New at 6 max....stat review please?

[iceman5]

Ive recently succummed to the trend of everyone playing 6 max. I started playing $1/$2 6 max and will move up soon if I feel like I have the hang of the differences between 6 max and full ring. Here are some stats from my 1st 4K hands. Please review and critisize where appropriate.

VIP 25.4%
Preflop raise 9.75%

Im wondering if these stats are rockish. I was at 16% and 4% at full ring, so I feel like a LAG as it is.

Att to steal blinds 21.6%
WSF 38.5%
WSD 52.5% (this is a little low I think)

Aggression

Flop...5.82
Turn...3.97
River..2.10

Total..4.46

Win rate....9.47 PTBBs / 100 hands
Standard Dev....34.9 BB / 100 hands

All critisicm is welcome. Im fully aware that 4K hands is nothing.
http://i14.photobucket.com/albums/a348/iceman55/6max4K.jpg

[ QUOTE ]

Win rate....9.47 PTBBs / 100 hands

[/ QUOTE ]

By the looks of it, you're fine. I'd go with what works.

[ghostface]

[ QUOTE ]
Im fully aware that 4K hands is nothing.

[/ QUOTE ]

Why post?

[gunslingner]

I'm currently playing NL100, but 25/10 looks very good to me.

I'm personally like 20/8 and feel like a tight ass sometimes..

[wtfsvi]

Sample size is ridicolous and you know it.

[iceman5]

[ QUOTE ]
Sample size is ridicolous and you know it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I believe I said that didnt I? Are you saying that this win rate is too high to be sustainable and that Im just running good?

I know full well what good win rate ranges are for full ring, but Im not really sure for 6 max. Does a good player who can adapt to 6 max normally win more playing 6 max?

If I posted and said I was the greatest player in the world and posted these these stats with that small sample size, then I would obviously be a moron. Im only posting to see if Im in the right ballpark stats wise (VIP, aggression, preflop raise %)

[wtfsvi]

</font><blockquote><font class="small">Svar på:</font><hr />
</font><blockquote><font class="small">Svar på:</font><hr />
Sample size is ridicolous and you know it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I believe I said that didnt I? Are you saying that this win rate is too high to be sustainable and that Im just running good?

[/ QUOTE ]
Yes, you said that, but you didn't say why you posted anyway.

As for vpip and pfr, the only things your sample size is not ridicolous in relation to, you should know full well that there is no "correct approach".

I'm not saying that that winrate is not sustainable, I'm saying NL is not a stat game. And efriggin' specially not after 4k hands.