PDA

View Full Version : Rake looks like a major factor in 1/2

hemstock
10-26-2005, 04:40 PM
http://img183.imageshack.us/img183/3312/rakek5lu.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

90$ in rake in one day?!
Seems like a lot for one level above .5/1
Is it worse for 2/4?
bozlax
10-26-2005, 06:02 PM
It's about a nickle a hand. In .5/1, it runs about .02 per hand. From 1/2 to 2/4 looks to be about the same % jump, up to around .075/hand.

Edit: Of course, it's also dependent on you winrate. A losting player will pay much less in rake, according to PT, than a winning one.
Reqtech
10-26-2005, 06:08 PM
One day is a little deceiving here. Most of us slobs don't play 1800 hands a day.
10-26-2005, 06:17 PM
I've played about 60K hands at Party 1/2 full and 6max, and my rake paid is almost exactly 3BB/100. I only have like 2K hands at .5/1 and it is around 3.5BB/100 there. In 18K hands at 2/4 it is around 2BB/100 for me.
BluEsiNsOuL
10-27-2005, 03:15 AM
I paid 7.84 cents/hand at 1/2 6max and 5.81 cents/hand at 1/2 full. I was a lot happier when I can win more than I paid for rake.

BTW, good to see it's green. /images/graemlins/laugh.gif
istewart
10-27-2005, 03:26 AM
http://img488.imageshack.us/img488/1152/party0gx.jpg
kapw7
10-27-2005, 03:32 AM
Have a look at this post (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Board=micro&Number=3008696&fpart =&PHPSESSID=) that gives the average rake - a TAG player should pay less but still it's a good guide to compare between sites and get a good idea how rake affects your winrate.
yellowjack
10-27-2005, 03:37 AM
$90 / # of players at the table = your portion of the rake
$15 if 6-max, $9-10 if full ring. That's nothing for 1800 hands.
10-27-2005, 04:05 AM
The rake is 3BB/100 hands? Whats a decent winrate for a winning player? If the rake cuts 3BB, I figure that hurts alot.

Is it really this much?
jason_t
10-27-2005, 04:38 AM
[ QUOTE ]
$90 / # of players at the table = your portion of the rake
$15 if 6-max, $9-10 if full ring. That's nothing for 1800 hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wrong. You're misinterpreting the stats he provided.
2+2 wannabe
10-27-2005, 07:39 AM
[ QUOTE ]
$90 / # of players at the table = your portion of the rake
$15 if 6-max, $9-10 if full ring. That's nothing for 1800 hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

90 is what is to the right of the equals sign - his portion

meaning that total is closer to 1000 for full ring
Webster
10-27-2005, 07:49 AM
Crypto the rake actually gets WORSE the higher you go. you pay more %% of the pot in 2/4 then 1/2. Weird

Prima has a "good" rake at the 1/2 levels at 3.7% of the pot.

Crypto is about 3.9 in 1/2 and 4.3% in 2/4

Party is 4.18% in 1/2, 3.29 in 2/4

Poker Stars is 3.6 in 1/2 and 2.8 in 2/4 but I don't have THAT many hands in 2/4.

Nothing you can do about rake.