View Full Version : Final Table Stars $150
sirio11
10-25-2005, 01:33 AM
7 left, 2nd in chips
Jurollo
10-25-2005, 01:35 AM
I knew there was a reason you were...
http://www.teacherweb.com/SC/PinewoodPrep/SkipReville/Blue.jpg
Good luck david.
~Justin
been sweating your tables since you were a ss with t6000 and only 10bb... GL!
JeffM
10-25-2005, 01:37 AM
I'm alive too. NJM800, 85k chips. GL sirio, you're playing great.
BPA234
10-25-2005, 01:56 AM
Also there...fortunately on Sirio's left
LearnedfromTV
10-25-2005, 01:58 AM
Wow. Good luck you three.
gr8vertical
10-25-2005, 02:12 AM
That pocket 4's hand was awesome /images/graemlins/cool.gif
istewart
10-25-2005, 02:12 AM
Holy [censored].
Christ, man, explain the 44 play to us mortals. I'dve folded that very quickly.
Jurollo
10-25-2005, 02:14 AM
NICE JOB to David and BPA!
~Justin
colson10
10-25-2005, 02:15 AM
GG, absolutely on fire lately.
Blindcurve
10-25-2005, 02:15 AM
What the hey is going on with the deal?
Exitonly
10-25-2005, 02:15 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Christ, man, explain the 44 play to us mortals. I'dve folded that very quickly.
[/ QUOTE ]
How come?? buttons range was any two there..
[ QUOTE ]
That pocket 4's hand was awesome /images/graemlins/cool.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
I'm really surprised he dodged that J, Q, or 10 there. Great hand.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Christ, man, explain the 44 play to us mortals. I'dve folded that very quickly.
[/ QUOTE ]
How come?? buttons range was any two there..
[/ QUOTE ]
Well... stacks were pretty extreme, and also:
equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 57.0228 % 56.26% 00.77% { 44 }
Hand 2: 42.9772 % 42.21% 00.77% { random }
Throw in stacks and the prize pool for second, and I fold this a lot.
Exitonly
10-25-2005, 02:25 AM
ok so he's 56% and theres BB's money in the pot, and if he wins he's in contention for first, ,and when he loses he still isn't shortstack (or if he is, it's close)
Jurollo
10-25-2005, 02:27 AM
converter troubles...
this is the hand in question...
PokerStars Game #2887917298: Tournament #14115926, Hold'em No Limit - Level XIX (8000/16000) - 2005/10/25 - 02:11:01 (ET)
Table '14115926 30' Seat #7 is the button
Seat 4: sirio11 (123910 in chips)
Seat 5: BPA234 (486820 in chips)
Seat 7: rudie_1068 (41770 in chips)
sirio11: posts the ante 800
BPA234: posts the ante 800
rudie_1068: posts the ante 800
sirio11: posts small blind 8000
BPA234: posts big blind 16000
*** HOLE CARDS ***
BPA234 said, "ty"
rudie_1068: raises 24970 to 40970 and is all-in
sirio11: raises 82140 to 123110 and is all-in
BPA234: calls 107110
*** FLOP *** [7d 5s 9h]
*** TURN *** [7d 5s 9h] [Ad]
*** RIVER *** [7d 5s 9h Ad] [3s]
*** SHOW DOWN ***
sirio11: shows [4s 4h] (a pair of Fours)
BPA234: shows [Qh Th] (high card Ace)
sirio11 collected 164280 from side pot
rudie_1068: shows [Jd 4c] (high card Ace)
sirio11 collected 125310 from main pot
BPA234 said, "gg"
*** SUMMARY ***
Total pot 289590 Main pot 125310. Side pot 164280. | Rake 0
Board [7d 5s 9h Ad 3s]
Seat 4: sirio11 (small blind) showed [4s 4h] and won (289590) with a pair of Fours
Seat 5: BPA234 (big blind) showed [Qh Th] and lost with high card Ace
Seat 7: rudie_1068 (button) showed [Jd 4c] and lost with high card Ace
0evg0
10-25-2005, 02:30 AM
[ QUOTE ]
ok so he's 56% and theres BB's money in the pot, and if he wins he's in contention for first, ,and when he loses he still isn't shortstack (or if he is, it's close)
[/ QUOTE ]
YOU MEAN HE'D BE IN THE RED-ZONE IF HE LOST???
AUTO CALL, CHECK/FOLD THE FLOP.
Jurollo
10-25-2005, 02:30 AM
I think that is a fairly straightforward play personally, I dont think there are too many advanced concepts in play here. I am trying to obtain 40K more in chips with relatively little risk against a villian who could be playing any two. I am pushing in an attempt to iso against the shortstack and keep the big stack from coming back over the top of me. Fairly straightforward I don't see the problem anyone has with it.
~Justin
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Christ, man, explain the 44 play to us mortals. I'dve folded that very quickly.
[/ QUOTE ]
How come?? buttons range was any two there..
[/ QUOTE ]
There was also the timing of his bet. He hesitated for a few seconds. To my mind that makes hands in the top 5% a tiny bit less likely and hands in the next 30% or so considerably less likely.
Not that it really matters, I think it's a clear overpush pretty much no matter what.
Jurollo
10-25-2005, 02:32 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I think that is a fairly straightforward play personally, I dont think there are too many advanced concepts in play here. I am trying to obtain 40K more in chips with relatively little risk against a villian who could be playing any two. I am pushing in an attempt to iso against the shortstack and keep the big stack from coming back over the top of me. Fairly straightforward I don't see the problem anyone has with it.
~Justin
[/ QUOTE ]
Also remember he is paying about $32K here to call this and getting an extra $16K thrown in from the BB. Very easy push IMHO.
~Justin
Blindcurve
10-25-2005, 02:33 AM
Nice finish, gents. Both of you.
-D.
[ QUOTE ]
I think that is a fairly straightforward play personally, I dont think there are too many advanced concepts in play here. I am trying to obtain 40K more in chips with relatively little risk against a villian who could be playing any two. I am pushing in an attempt to iso against the shortstack and keep the big stack from coming back over the top of me. Fairly straightforward I don't see the problem anyone has with it.
~Justin
[/ QUOTE ]
Okay. I guess I just suck
Jurollo
10-25-2005, 02:34 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think that is a fairly straightforward play personally, I dont think there are too many advanced concepts in play here. I am trying to obtain 40K more in chips with relatively little risk against a villian who could be playing any two. I am pushing in an attempt to iso against the shortstack and keep the big stack from coming back over the top of me. Fairly straightforward I don't see the problem anyone has with it.
~Justin
[/ QUOTE ]
Okay. I guess I just suck
[/ QUOTE ]
Or I do. Just calling it like I see it. We need some of the blue man group to weigh in, haha.
~Justin
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I think that is a fairly straightforward play personally, I dont think there are too many advanced concepts in play here. I am trying to obtain 40K more in chips with relatively little risk against a villian who could be playing any two. I am pushing in an attempt to iso against the shortstack and keep the big stack from coming back over the top of me. Fairly straightforward I don't see the problem anyone has with it.
~Justin
[/ QUOTE ]
Okay. I guess I just suck
[/ QUOTE ]
Or I do. Just calling it like I see it. We need some of the blue man group to weigh in, haha.
~Justin
[/ QUOTE ]
Oh wow. I totally forgot the fact that he gets second if big stack calls and wins. I'm not gonna play anymore today /images/graemlins/smile.gif. nh guys, nice score.
0evg0
10-25-2005, 02:36 AM
No, this really is just as straightforward as it looks.
sirio is getting great odds, is definitely the favorite no matter how tight you make BPA's range, and has FE against the chip leader which is important because he will not bust and will still be a viable force if he loses vs BPA - but sirio will put himself into serious contention if/when he wins. no question here unless 2nd place prize money is really important to you.
BPA234
10-25-2005, 02:40 AM
For what it's worth, I think the 44 push is mandatory there. Also, he knew I would split, and I was likely to call for pot odds w/any two. Which I did with Q10s.
CardSharpCook
10-25-2005, 03:00 AM
wtg, David
Subby
10-25-2005, 12:44 PM
Congrats on the win...you knocked me out right before the final table when your 76s held up against my AQs. So I can take a bit of solace in being bounced by the winner...
Your bubble play was a sight to behold...top-notch and a well-deserved win!
Shorty35
10-25-2005, 12:49 PM
Congrats David. Nice to see you run goooot...
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.