difference between 109 and 55

I usually play 109,but scince the split it"s hard to get 4 tables going at the same time. So I play 2-109 and 2-55
From what i see in a small sample size thereis a huge difference in quality of play.
My roi at the 109 through 400 was 24% through forty %55 itis 45%.I know it not realistic to keep that roi.But i see crazy pushes,and crazy calls with more than avarege stacks.
Can anyone else see the difference who played both?

[eastbay]

Yes, there is a big difference.

eastbay

[freemoney]

fwiw i think a great player could have a 24% ROI at the 55s

[ QUOTE ]
fwiw i think a great player could have a 24% ROI at the 55s

[/ QUOTE ]

Maybe four tabling, not eight... or do you think they could pull it off eight tabling?

[freemoney]

yeah in sets i really do think over 20% is def very poaaible

Okie dokie.

Your right, it probably is possible.

I wasnt sure as I am still a 11 grinder.

I love the 11s, so easy to beat and not that much variance.

[freemoney]

im not saying i do i dont play the 55s even just that 20%+ is very possible at that level.

[ QUOTE ]
im not saying i do i dont play the 55s even just that 20%+ is very possible at that level.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I know. /images/graemlins/smile.gif

Hopefully one day I will be at this level, lol! Hell Im happy at the 11s right now tho.

[ QUOTE ]
I love the 11s, so easy to beat and not that much variance.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm bored, so fwiw, a 20% roi at the $11s has the same variance as a 20% roi at the $55s.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I love the 11s, so easy to beat and not that much variance.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm bored, so fwiw, a 20% roi at the $11s has the same variance as a 20% roi at the $55s.

[/ QUOTE ]

Touche. LOL!

I just like playing against overall worse players is all. /images/graemlins/smile.gif

Hey this is just my hobby, not a career! Yet, of course. LOL!

I dont mind grinding out a couple extra hundred bucks a week at the 11s. Nice spending money on the side ya know?

[Nicholasp27]

i think what he meant by variance was 'swings in bankroll'

a -10 swing is only -110 in 11s, but is -550 in 55s

but yeah, variance is the same

[Lloyd]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I love the 11s, so easy to beat and not that much variance.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm bored, so fwiw, a 20% roi at the $11s has the same variance as a 20% roi at the $55s.

[/ QUOTE ]
Negative. ROI and variance are not necessarily correlated. You can easily have the same ROI but a different variance. If, for example, in the 11s you always win 1 out of 4 games, you have very little variance. But if in the 50s you win 2, lose 5, win 7, and then go on to lose 22 in a row - your variance is pretty big. But in both examples you win 1 out of 4.

[raptor517]

[ QUOTE ]
im not saying i do i dont play the 55s even just that 20%+ is very possible at that level.

[/ QUOTE ]

well, 4 tabling with even decent table selection and excellent early game and perfect bubble play will get you 20%. not a lot more, but 20% is def doable. holla