View Full Version : who are the good players at the 30sngs on party
i play some at the 30s as em_ERIC_ and em_KINGERIC_ and just saw some post on here asking about players on some other tables and was just wondering if any of u knew any good players to stay away from at the 30s.. also i have about build up the bank roll and am gonna give the 100s a shot soon hopefully so any help with the good players there would be great also.
thanks eric
Slim Pickens
10-07-2005, 02:12 AM
Fix yer post quick... I'm not waiting two months for the results.
The Yugoslavian
10-07-2005, 02:13 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Fix yer post quick... I'm not waiting two months for the results.
[/ QUOTE ]
Why in the world would you want/need to view the results of this poll?!? /images/graemlins/confused.gif
Yugoslav
So we can finally be sure that everyone who visits 2+2 is a winning player.
Slim Pickens
10-07-2005, 02:15 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Fix yer post quick... I'm not waiting two months for the results.
[/ QUOTE ]
Why in the world would you want/need to view the results of this poll?!? /images/graemlins/confused.gif
Yugoslav
[/ QUOTE ]
I don't, but on the off chance the OP ever posts again, he might want to know not to do that.
The Yugoslavian
10-07-2005, 02:16 AM
[ QUOTE ]
So we can finally be sure that everyone who visits 2+2 is a winning player.
[/ QUOTE ]
Oh, it already should be obvious that everyone but ace in the whole is killing the game for 2351234521365123451235 ROI and makes $112352156213452135/hr.
Yugoslav
i think i played a 30+3 once or twice
lorinda
10-07-2005, 03:38 AM
I think this means they are 6906 tabling, but I only did the calculation very quickly, so I may be wrong.
Lori
beeyjay
10-07-2005, 03:55 AM
i been to the 30s... never seen you so youre obviously lying... you aint win games... you aint a gamer.
ace_in_the_hole
10-07-2005, 04:09 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Oh, it already should be obvious that everyone but ace in the whole is killing the game for 2351234521365123451235 ROI and makes $112352156213452135/hr.
Yugoslav
[/ QUOTE ]
LOL /images/graemlins/smile.gif I think all my recent rants have been due mostly to nicotine withdrawl because after playing 56 $33's today I actually made $500 putting me at +170 for the month. Holla.
And thanks for the helpful and encouraging post.
Out.
chisness
10-07-2005, 04:13 AM
i liked it more when you were losing
Hornacek
10-07-2005, 09:05 AM
[ QUOTE ]
i liked it more when you were losing
[/ QUOTE ]
bearly
10-07-2005, 10:09 AM
a wise and perceptive poster--thanks, btape
bearly
10-07-2005, 10:11 AM
yugo, a moment of brilliance
Freudian
10-07-2005, 11:30 AM
I have a ROI of 354% at the 33s.
TheNoodleMan
10-07-2005, 11:41 AM
[ QUOTE ]
i play some at the 30s as em_ERIC_ and em_KINGERIC_ and just saw some post on here asking about players on some other tables and was just wondering if any of u knew any good players to stay away from at the 30s.. also i have about build up the bank roll and am gonna give the 100s a shot soon hopefully so any help with the good players there would be great also.
thanks eric
[/ QUOTE ]
If you are worried about what players to avoid at the 33s, you damn sure don't need to be playing the 109s.
The 30s fill up so fast that you really don't have any time to scout the table before it fills up and starts without you. Looking for players to avoid at this level is more trouble than it is worth, IMO. Put Raptor across the table from me and fill in the rest with your average 33 donk and I'm in a +ev situation.
I play the 33s on party. I have started to take it much more seriously this month. so far, i have been killing. I dont 4 table, I only 2 table, but i am making about 27 an hour...Right now, my sample size is too small, around 150 sngs, but if i can keep up these numbers and/or only experience a small drop off when i start to 4 table, my future looks bright.
Since I 2-table, how much of a drop off would you expect if someone jumps to 4-tables?
raptor517
10-07-2005, 11:55 AM
[ QUOTE ]
Put Raptor across the table from me and fill in the rest with your average 33 donk and I'm in a +ev situation.
[/ QUOTE ]
not as +ev as it could be though /images/graemlins/wink.gif holla
raptor517
10-07-2005, 11:56 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I play the 33s on party. I have started to take it much more seriously this month. so far, i have been killing. I dont 4 table, I only 2 table, but i am making about 27 an hour...Right now, my sample size is too small, around 150 sngs, but if i can keep up these numbers and/or only experience a small drop off when i start to 4 table, my future looks bright.
Since I 2-table, how much of a drop off would you expect if someone jumps to 4-tables?
[/ QUOTE ]
u will be severely dissapointed in the near future, this i assure you. holla
Hornacek
10-07-2005, 11:57 AM
$27 for 2 tables ~ 1 hr?
That's a 27/66 = 40.9% ROI. LOL
Good luck keeping that up.
I don't think you really need to worry about ROI going down, as long as your $/hr goes up. In the long run, all we care is the money, not the ROI numbers, right?
$.02
believe me, i am dreading it...i realize it isnt sustainable. I have played a lot more than 150 with good results, but only 150 on this computer and i ditched my other one, so i lost all the HHs...
I realize i am in for a rough stretch at some point to bring my numbers back down to earth...just gotta prepare and be ready for it mentally.
ya, i bought a new computer, set up rakeback and decided to go nuts...over my first 150 33s, i have 47% itm and 41% ROI
You dont have to tell me its not sustainable...well aware of it, but let me enjoy it while it lasts /images/graemlins/smile.gif
TheNoodleMan
10-07-2005, 12:05 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Put Raptor across the table from me and fill in the rest with your average 33 donk and I'm in a +ev situation.
[/ QUOTE ]
not as +ev as it could be though /images/graemlins/wink.gif holla
[/ QUOTE ]
No argument here.
[ QUOTE ]
ya, i bought a new computer, set up rakeback and decided to go nuts...over my first 150 33s, i have 47% itm and 41% ROI
You dont have to tell me its not sustainable...well aware of it, but let me enjoy it while it lasts /images/graemlins/smile.gif
[/ QUOTE ]
Awww, but it is so much funner looking into the darkside of things. /images/graemlins/cool.gif
nobody is any help i haven't seen grammy_9999 or lilwinston as an answer once and they are both leaderboard players who play almost only 30s
Slim Pickens
10-11-2005, 03:14 AM
If you already knew the answer, why the [censored] did you ask us? Your question was stupid, and I suspect you are too.
The one player who comes to mind is crzychinamen.
The Yugoslavian
10-11-2005, 03:53 AM
[ QUOTE ]
The one player who comes to mind is crzychinamen.
[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I talked with him a bunch a long time ago.....there are some stylistic things he tends to do which I'm not entirely sure are best but overall he's v good.
Yugoslav
Scuba Chuck
10-11-2005, 05:26 AM
[ QUOTE ]
The one player who comes to mind is crzychinamen.
[/ QUOTE ]
Dumdumbo? Although, haven't seen him in a little while.
The Yugoslavian
10-11-2005, 06:00 AM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
The one player who comes to mind is crzychinamen.
[/ QUOTE ]
Dumdumbo? Although, haven't seen him in a little while.
[/ QUOTE ]
Okay...well for that matter GoBlue and philosoph.....I'm sure I can remember a few others too.
Crzychinaman I think is the only one still playing almost exclusively $33s, altho I really dont' know b/c I don't particularly play much of 'em anymore.
Yugoslav
stupidsucker
10-11-2005, 11:15 AM
I rarely bothered with table selection at the 33s. Most people whos SNs I knew avoided me.
The Yugoslavian
10-11-2005, 01:07 PM
[ QUOTE ]
I rarely bothered with table selection at the 33s. Most people whos SNs I knew avoided me.
[/ QUOTE ]
Yeah, I certainly avoided you, /images/graemlins/frown.gif.
Well for a couple months where I played a ton (for me) of 33s I think table selection actually *did* need to come into play. I avoided players and *still8 ended up playing many strong players multiple times. Irie posted about that bottleneck as many probably remember and just at that time it was clearing up.
I haven't played the $33s regularly enough since then but I'd imagine there isn't nearly the bottleneck that there used to be.
Yugoslav
Hornacek
10-11-2005, 01:14 PM
The solid players I see the most are CrzyChinaMan and fireballjohn. My name is Hornacek930 or OkeyBokey1 or Milicic1 on those sites. I used to play a ton, but not as much since I graduated college and started working.
runner4life7
10-11-2005, 01:51 PM
I'm pukingtables, watch out for me /images/graemlins/wink.gif
citanul
10-11-2005, 02:00 PM
you might want to take shots at teh 50s before taking shots at the 100s... just a though...
as for philosoph, i'm not sure, there might be a _ at the end of the 215s player with the same name, who is most likely gammon.
c
ps: this thread sucks.
Oluwafemi
10-11-2005, 02:19 PM
[ QUOTE ]
you might want to take shots at teh 50s before taking shots at the 100s... just a though...
as for philosoph, i'm not sure, there might be a _ at the end of the 215s player with the same name, who is most likely gammon.
c
ps: this thread sucks.
[/ QUOTE ]
i think i asked this same question about Philosoph and Gammon a couple of weeks ago and were told it's not the same person. am i reading your post right?
fisherman112
10-11-2005, 02:25 PM
the player pool is too big to worry about specific players
besides, if anyone gets really good, they're moving up in stakes. so you should really just worry about the actions of each player at your table during that particular torunament
citanul
10-11-2005, 03:38 PM
i thought that they were the same person. it's entirely possible your info is better than mine though.
c
vBulletin® v3.8.11, Copyright ©2000-2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.