PDA

View Full Version : AA32 hand that's been bugging me...

Harv72b
09-29-2005, 10:29 PM
I'm primarily a LHE player who's been dabbling in LO8 for about a month now. While I have a decent grasp on starting hand requirements & the (very) basics in postflop play, I'm far from good at the game; but the opponents I've run into on Party .50/1 & 1/2 are bad enough that I'm still winning at a respectable clip.

SB is the only other player involved in this hand that I'd describe as "good". The other 3 are all varying degrees of loose (37%-64% VPIPs) and not at all good postflop.

I guess I played the first 3 streets properly with a good hand + strong low draw (?), but I have no idea what my line should be on this river.

Party Poker 1/2 Omaha Hi/Lo (8 handed) converter (http://www.selachian.com/tools/bisonconverter/hhconverter.cgi)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 2/images/graemlins/diamond.gif, 3/images/graemlins/club.gif, A/images/graemlins/club.gif, A/images/graemlins/diamond.gif.
UTG calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, SB calls,
<font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, UTG calls, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, SB calls.

Flop: (10 SB) K/images/graemlins/spade.gif, 5/images/graemlins/spade.gif, 6/images/graemlins/heart.gif <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
SB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG calls, MP1 calls, MP2 calls, SB folds.

Turn: (7 BB) 9/images/graemlins/heart.gif <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
<font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, UTG calls, MP1 calls, MP2 calls.

River: (11 BB) T/images/graemlins/spade.gif <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
Hero...?
Wintermute
09-29-2005, 10:31 PM
check-folds
09-29-2005, 10:32 PM
What he said.

Don't you think that at least one of these callers stayed in to pull a spade?
DyessMan89
09-29-2005, 10:33 PM
[ QUOTE ]
check-folds

[/ QUOTE ]

Yup, and its not close.
Harv72b
09-29-2005, 10:36 PM
That's what I thought &amp; what I did. I guess it's just the Hold'Em player in me that finds something distasteful about folding an overpair.
09-29-2005, 11:00 PM
[ QUOTE ]
That's what I thought &amp; what I did. I guess it's just the Hold'Em player in me that finds something distasteful about folding an overpair.

[/ QUOTE ]

You had better get used to it, and quick.
MyTurn2Raise
09-30-2005, 03:44 AM
[ QUOTE ]
check-folds

[/ QUOTE ]

without a single ounce of regret or doubt
Buzz
09-30-2005, 05:29 AM
[ QUOTE ]
I guess I played the first 3 streets properly with a good hand + strong low draw (?), but I have no idea what my line should be on this river.

[/ QUOTE ]

Harv - You could have played the first three streets differently, but the way you played them was fine. It's easy to play when you have good cards, and for the first three rounds you had good cards.

But things have a way of often changing in Omaha-8. And on the river, you simply don't have good cards any more.

On the river you really should want the ace of spades plus anther spade (for the nut flush). Or at least you want the second nut flush (here the spade queen plus another spade).

However, you have neither of these.

In a simulation of your hand, this board, and three opponents with random cards, your pair was the high hand 173/10000 times, tied for high with another pair of aces 9/10000 times and lost 9818/10000 times.

So clearly your overpair is a loser.

However a flush only won 5711/10000 times - and all of those wins were not with nut flushes.

That means something besides the nut flush wins a substantial portion of the time. Indeed, when I gave Hero the second nut flush (a queen high flush with this board) and the other three opponents random cards, the queen high flush won 8775/10000, only losing to an ace high flush 1225/10000, about one time out of eight.

There are eleven big bets in the pot and nobody probably holds the nut flush. Will a bet from Hero induce everybody who doesn’t have the nut flush to fold? Will a bet from Hero induce everybody who doesn’t have a flush to fold? A bet by Hero would amount to a pure bluff. What if Hero has not been caught in a bluff? Is this a reasonable place to try one?

I don’t know the answers because they depend on Hero’s image in the eyes of his opponents and they also depend on Hero’s opponents and their perception of what it takes to win here.

Understand that Hero’s overpair is garbage. However, this is a place Hero might get away with a bluff, especially if these opponents have all been known to fold to a bet on the river. And if Hero gets caught, well, maybe Hero should never bluff against these particular opponents again - but in that case they’ll always pay him off when he bets a winner on the river. (And that cannot be bad in Omaha-8).

So what should your line be on the river, Harv? I don’t know. Check/folding is one choice and was my first impulse.

On the other hand, this doesn’t seem a bad place to try a bluff. You ought to at least consider a bluff. (But if you’ve already been caught bluffing, keep in mind that a bluff is less likely to work).

Buzz
chaos
09-30-2005, 08:30 AM
I would check &amp; fold on the river.

I might have even checked the turn with three opponents. It does not seem like you have any chance for high. With the board being double suited, any heart or spade is likely to give someone a flush. Someone probably has two pair or a set already. So you are just drawing at the low.