KQ in late position.

[runout_mick]

I was thinking about this post: Is AK really a coinflip? (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=3485230&page=7&view=colla psed&sb=5&o=14&fpart=1) .

Following the same line of thought, does KQ become more valuable in late position with several limpers? Limpers are more likely to have Ax and mid pp, and less likely to hold Kx or Qx, so does it make sense that with KQ your live outs left in the deck increase with every limper before you?

Or am I thinking too much?

Speculating on things that can't really be speculated on.. People do like to play aces, but they also like to play kings and queens.. really no way of telling

[fnurt]

There is an argument that AK and AQ, the two hands you are afraid of, are not likely to be limped. But I don't buy the argument that limpers are less likely to have kings and queens, and I think trying to infer anything meaningful about card distribution from the fact that people have limped will turn out to be a fruitless enterprise overall.