Anyone have a "REAL" sample at the 33's?

[ace_in_the_hole]

I'm looking for someone to post stats at the 33's or 55's that are over at least 2,000 SNG's I'm begening to think anything over 10%ROI for more than 2,000 SnG's is an incredible feat.

[Nicholasp27]

hornacek says he's 25% and has played 33s for the past 2 years...maybe he can tell u how many games that he's played in that time period

[ace_in_the_hole]

[ QUOTE ]
hornacek says he's 25% and has played 33s for the past 2 years...maybe he can tell u how many games that he's played in that time period

[/ QUOTE ]

I find that VERY hard to believe and am very impressed. But mostly I'm just jealous, especially being in the midst of a 25 buyin downswing over 200 SnG's.

[microbet]

Raptor has like 17% or 18% over like 7000+ $55s.

[se2schul]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm looking for someone to post stats at the 33's or 55's that are over at least 2,000 SNG's I'm begening to think anything over 10%ROI for more than 2,000 SnG's is an incredible feat.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think that most winning players will have like a 7 or 8% ROI, however I don't doubt that there are very talented players out there capable of close to 40% at these levels.

I don't have many $33's yet, but I imagine I'm close to a 10% ROI player, probably just under 10%.

[bones]

[ QUOTE ]
think that most winning players will have like a 7 or 8% ROI, however I don't doubt that there are very talented players out there capable of close to 40% at these levels.

[/ QUOTE ]

I'm pretty sure Phil Ivey couldn't beat the 33s or 55s for 40%.

[Hornacek]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
hornacek says he's 25% and has played 33s for the past 2 years...maybe he can tell u how many games that he's played in that time period

[/ QUOTE ]

I find that VERY hard to believe and am very impressed. But mostly I'm just jealous, especially being in the midst of a 25 buyin downswing over 200 SnG's.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah I'm at work right now, but I have stats at home... 20-25% ROI is attainable with diligence and PATIENCE... these idiots will definitely pay you off in the long run.

But I just ordered a new 2001FP and will begin 8-tabling soon, so who knows? More to come...

Edit: I guess what I'm trying to say is... ROI isn't super important as long as you're a winning player. I have stats from the last 6 months of so on SNGTracker at home, but I kept Excel files prior to that and never had a losing month...

[axeshigh]

I have around 1500 at the 55s. I guess I can post the stats when I get to 2000, like in 2-3 weeks.

[Ogre]

i went 0/1/0/2 last week when i played some HE 30+3s

[Shillx]

Yeah I'm starting to wonder the same thing as well. The swings in this game are just brutal. I lost 45 buy-ins in 100 SNGs then won about 40 buy-ins in very next 60 SNGs.

For someone with my ROI (about 2.8% over 750) a -45% ROI over 100 will happen like once in a lifetime. And having a +66% over 60 will take place about once every 30000 SNGs. I switched to SNGs to get away from the LHE swings but I only found them to be as bad or worse. Ugh.

Brad

[Degen]

I have well over 2000 33's. 10% is no incredible feat and is certainly attainable.

[ QUOTE ]
For someone with my ROI (about 2.8% over 750) a -45% ROI over 100 will happen like once in a lifetime. And having a +66% over 60 will take place about once every 30000 SNGs. I switched to SNGs to get away from the LHE swings but I only found them to be as bad or worse. Ugh.

[/ QUOTE ]

Same boat.

I'll go to no limit...no one will ever be able to draw out on me again!

[Bonafone]

I have close to 2500 55's logged, and greater than a 15% roi is very attainable in my opinion for a solid player.

[chisness]

bit over 2500 here and slightly above 15%, 8-12 tabling about half and half

[chisness]

bona, are you saying that ABOUT 15% (slightly over) is doable or WELL over is doable?

how about for someone 8 tabling?

[ace_in_the_hole]

Be very greatful that variance hasn;t slapped you yet.

[Bonafone]

Well I'm a pretty big luckbox, but I also don't play too well (I make many mistakes), so I think my ROI is a decent indicator of what can be expected by a good player with normal luck.

IMO I think that 20% is doable (not easily) even while 8 tabling by the top players, but anyone that can do that won't be playing the 50's too long.

[chisness]

ace, trust me, i've been very varied

as just about everyone has said, 15% is very good in general and solid among good players, but still even higher is possible to sustain

[psyduck]

[ QUOTE ]
I have well over 2000 33's. 10% is no incredible feat and is certainly attainable.

[/ QUOTE ]

Same. I have 15% over 1500 33s (some 55s mixed in there).

[psyduck]

[ QUOTE ]
Be very greatful that variance hasn;t slapped you yet.

[/ QUOTE ]

Of course it has. I've lost 40 buy-ins over like 120 SNGs once (over a week, back when I wasn't 8-tabling). I've dropped 20 buy-ins in a single day of 30 SNGs.

[Degen]

im about the same at the 33's, slightly less at the 55's

i had 1k at the 33's just under 30% but as many people here told me would happen, it settled under 20...though if you aren't hitting 10 you are definately doing something wrong (over a big enough sample...)