09-21-2005, 02:03 AM
I'm fairly new to poker, so please excuse the noobish question.
In theory, would a player beating the 1-2 or 2-4 for a decent earn be able to successfully do the same at the higher limits given an adaquate BR, provided he excersised maticulous table selection?
I mean, is it that the winning players at those levels are ALOT better, and negate any advantage that the 2-4 player would have over the bad players, or is it simply that there aren't that many bad players at those levels, effectively making the 2-4 players the fish?
It just seems odd to me to see so many obviously intellegent and studious players in the micros (and SS) that have unbelivable knowledge of the game, that aren't playing the higher limits. Is poker alot tougher and more complicated than I imagine? Or is it simply just BR related?
In theory, would a player beating the 1-2 or 2-4 for a decent earn be able to successfully do the same at the higher limits given an adaquate BR, provided he excersised maticulous table selection?
I mean, is it that the winning players at those levels are ALOT better, and negate any advantage that the 2-4 player would have over the bad players, or is it simply that there aren't that many bad players at those levels, effectively making the 2-4 players the fish?
It just seems odd to me to see so many obviously intellegent and studious players in the micros (and SS) that have unbelivable knowledge of the game, that aren't playing the higher limits. Is poker alot tougher and more complicated than I imagine? Or is it simply just BR related?