PDA

View Full Version : How bad are the Party 200NL games?


CWilly
09-09-2005, 12:33 PM
I've been playing on the prima network for pretty much all my poker career so far, but recently I've noticed that i'm being surrounded by rocks and TAG's in my usual $200NL games. The only time i can find good games is at around 4am! (Drunk Americans??)

Anyway, how bad are the party players compared to prima at this level? Is it worth moving my bankroll across?

Cheers,

CWilly

TheWorstPlayer
09-09-2005, 12:38 PM
terrible. yes. stay off my tables.

crosse91
09-09-2005, 12:44 PM
mine too.

seriously its about 75-80% tags and rocks. (at full ring obviously) that being said i've got it by the balls, and it is very beatable.

CWilly
09-09-2005, 12:51 PM
Yea, its definately beatable, but i'm wondering whether Party would be even more beatable.

crosse91
09-09-2005, 12:53 PM
well i've never played prima so i'm afraid i'm not much more help here.

KowCiller
09-09-2005, 01:01 PM
Every once in a while you'll get a table against people who can play...

However generally I think it's tighter than the NL100. With good game selection, you can still find plenty of donators though.

The above comments refer to full ring, but I need to force myself to transition to 6max. Based on what I read here it seems like I'm really missing out on the "party" so to speak.

KoW

DaveduFresne
09-09-2005, 02:39 PM
Obviously all sorts of players can appear in any type of game. I would say in general though that most players are not going to donate their entire stack to you with just top pair.

Voltron87
09-09-2005, 03:13 PM
lolololol at people saying the 200nl party 6m games are anything but cheddar.