PokerGrader Leaderboard

[x2ski]

What's with all these folks on the PG leaderboard with only 150 hands of bad luck, or 450 hands... whatever.

Boo-freaking-hoo.

What about those with 1,000s of hands of bad luck (maybe even good luck, but never for me lol). I think runs such as the one below merit leaderboard status, even though the luck factor isn't as big as these small sample-size vaginas who are currently on the leaderboard.

Linky (http://www.pokergrader.com/display.php?a=4228973&p=1)



Perhaps PokerGrader Guy could divide the leaderboard into sections (2,500+ hands, 1,000+ hands etc.)?

Just a suggestion 'cause I'm pissed and hate variance but still wanna be recognized for it.[/rant]

[MiguelSanchez]

I'm at -16 overall luck over my last 3k hands...luckily I have somehow stayed positive in BB/100 (1.79). Not quite as bad as yours but there are at least 3-4 times yesterday when I saw a flop, thought of the best possible two cards that someone could have, and sure enough that's what they had. Things like my AKh losing to a flopped 467h when I thought wow, 58h would look real good right now, but dismissed the thought because it was capped preflop... </rant>

[x2ski]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm at -16 overall luck over my last 3k hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

Welcome to the Leaderboard!

I can have winning sessions with a -10 luck factor, but -16 is pretty impressive AFAIK.

Another 2,000 hands from today's session puts me at 6,000+ hands at -20 for luck.

Linkage (http://www.pokergrader.com/display.php?a=5858453&p=1)

[pokergrader]

Alright, making a 1000+ hand leaderboard shouldn't be too much work. Im pretty busy until friday, but I think I can add it then.

[x2ski]

[ QUOTE ]
Alright, making a 1000+ hand leaderboard shouldn't be too much work. Im pretty busy until friday, but I think I can add it then.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sweet man... Thanks.