PDA

View Full Version : Site with highest stakes online?

09-04-2005, 10:22 PM
Which site has the highest stakes for no limit holdem
GutPunch
09-04-2005, 10:23 PM
UB has 50/100 NL Hold em
smb394
09-04-2005, 10:33 PM
UB also has 300/600 FL Holdem
Pokamastah
09-04-2005, 10:37 PM
Prima has 200/400NL heads up table
09-04-2005, 11:03 PM
would be nice if some place had 500/1000 NL
Jurollo
09-04-2005, 11:10 PM
[ QUOTE ]
would be nice if some place had 500/1000 NL

[/ QUOTE ]
Yea because that is in such high demand.
~Justin
09-04-2005, 11:22 PM
If you build it....they will come...
jman220
09-04-2005, 11:26 PM
[ QUOTE ]
If you build it....they will come...

[/ QUOTE ]

I can't think of many people who would be comfortable having a million dollars at an online poker site. (I'm assuming a 100k-200k buy in for a 500/1000 game).
09-04-2005, 11:28 PM
probably now, but in about 2-3 yrs it should change.
Jurollo
09-04-2005, 11:34 PM
You are over estimating the long term viability of this online poker boom. I would be willing to bet games this high won't be seen at any significant number of sites ever. Lower limits are the bread and butter of poker sites anyway.
~Justin
jman220
09-04-2005, 11:39 PM
[ QUOTE ]
You are over estimating the long term viability of this online poker boom. I would be willing to bet games this high won't be seen at any significant number of sites ever. Lower limits are the bread and butter of poker sites anyway.
~Justin

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, there's actually a pretty convincing argument that sites wouldn't want to spread a limit this high even if they could fill it with players. They're not making much, if any more on rake by spreading those limits, but their fish are busting out much much much faster than at the lower limits.
Jurollo
09-04-2005, 11:44 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
You are over estimating the long term viability of this online poker boom. I would be willing to bet games this high won't be seen at any significant number of sites ever. Lower limits are the bread and butter of poker sites anyway.
~Justin

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, there's actually a pretty convincing argument that sites wouldn't want to spread a limit this high even if they could fill it with players. They're not making much, if any more on rake by spreading those limits, but their fish are busting out much much much faster than at the lower limits.

[/ QUOTE ]

Bingo Bango!
http://www.twyman.org.uk/copyright-photos/hit_the_nail_on_the_head.jpg
lefty rosen
09-05-2005, 01:43 AM
World Sports Exchange had the biggest limit games at one time and they were destroyed by a bunch of pros for that reason. How long can a player sustain 10K losses, Bill Gates and Warren Buffet aside..... /images/graemlins/grin.gif