PDA

View Full Version : National Geographic Article eeriely prophetic


Toro
09-03-2005, 11:48 AM
link (http://www3.nationalgeographic.com/ngm/0410/feature5/)


Apologies if this has already been posted but this article is unreal in it's prophesy.

It was a broiling August afternoon in New Orleans, Louisiana, the Big Easy, the City That Care Forgot. Those who ventured outside moved as if they were swimming in tupelo honey. Those inside paid silent homage to the man who invented air-conditioning as they watched TV "storm teams" warn of a hurricane in the Gulf of Mexico. Nothing surprising there: Hurricanes in August are as much a part of life in this town as hangovers on Ash Wednesday.

But the next day the storm gathered steam and drew a bead on the city. As the whirling maelstrom approached the coast, more than a million people evacuated to higher ground. Some 200,000 remained, however—the car-less, the homeless, the aged and infirm, and those die-hard New Orleanians who look for any excuse to throw a party.

The storm hit Breton Sound with the fury of a nuclear warhead, pushing a deadly storm surge into Lake Pontchartrain. The water crept to the top of the massive berm that holds back the lake and then spilled over. Nearly 80 percent of New Orleans lies below sea level—more than eight feet below in places—so the water poured in. A liquid brown wall washed over the brick ranch homes of Gentilly, over the clapboard houses of the Ninth Ward, over the white-columned porches of the Garden District, until it raced through the bars and strip joints on Bourbon Street like the pale rider of the Apocalypse. As it reached 25 feet (eight meters) over parts of the city, people climbed onto roofs to escape it.

Thousands drowned in the murky brew that was soon contaminated by sewage and industrial waste. Thousands more who survived the flood later perished from dehydration and disease as they waited to be rescued. It took two months to pump the city dry, and by then the Big Easy was buried under a blanket of putrid sediment, a million people were homeless, and 50,000 were dead. It was the worst natural disaster in the history of the United States.

When did this calamity happen? It hasn't—yet . . . .

Broken Glass Can
09-03-2005, 12:08 PM
Where is the bit about the governor and mayor doing nothing in the days leading up to the storm?

http://billhobbs.com/hobbsonline/floodedbuses.jpg

Brainwalter
09-03-2005, 12:09 PM
Yeah, they've been saying all week that they've been saying for years that this was inevitable.

09-03-2005, 12:19 PM
do you seriously not put any blaim on the federal government. We're not talking about New York, or California here. Louisiana is hardly a wealthy state equiped to handle this type of disastor. The previous FEMA head quit over funding cuts enacted by your boy Bush. The feds set this up to happen, not the rescource starved state government.

cardcounter0
09-03-2005, 12:42 PM
National Geographic articles are useless.

Bush doesn't read.

MelchyBeau
09-03-2005, 12:46 PM
[ QUOTE ]

Where is the bit about the governor and mayor doing nothing in the days leading up to the storm?

[/ QUOTE ]

Where is the bit about this not being the politics forum?

Melch

Blarg
09-03-2005, 09:34 PM
If we get too anal about it, any thread or post risks being deleted, edited or moderated into absurdity every time anyone mentions any aspect of government or a single politician or political idea of program. That would make it virtually impossible to have threads or posts anyone would want to read or contribute to.

The moderators here by and large are excellent, especially in comparison to the abysmal moderation most boards could only aspire to, and I think they do well to generally let people be people except in the case of outright or prolonged nastiness. One of the key things to good moderation is that it doesn't get out of control and become worse than the perceived offenses it attempts to moderate. This is one of the rarer boards where the moderators aren't worse than the contributors. I hope we keep it that way and don't start trying to prompt them to sweat every post.

Broken Glass Can
09-03-2005, 09:40 PM
[ QUOTE ]
If we get too anal about it, any thread or post risks being deleted, edited or moderated into absurdity every time anyone mentions any aspect of government or a single politician or political idea of program.

[/ QUOTE ]

I would suggest to the moderators, instead of locking or deleting Political threads in OOT, move them to the politics forum. That should make everyone happy.

Blarg
09-03-2005, 11:09 PM
Yeah, as long as they cross a threshold of being genuinely political threads, not just having some political content. I'd hate to see every thread at the mercy of any random clown going "politician or policy X sucks."

touchfaith
09-03-2005, 11:56 PM
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]

Where is the bit about the governor and mayor doing nothing in the days leading up to the storm?

[/ QUOTE ]

Where is the bit about this not being the politics forum?

Melch

[/ QUOTE ]

Mat has obviously been more lenient about political posts given the fact that we have been in the middle of a national tragedy this past week. Just as it should be.

Today, now that control of the crisis is getting closer and closer, the posts have been getting rightfully moved.

Thanks for the space Mat...I think everyone needed it this week.