DavidC
09-02-2005, 12:32 PM
10 handed game at 2/4. The pots were nice when there were two fish, but one of the fish left and was replaced by an "established" TAA (i.e. I recognised his user name before the stats popped up).
Looking around the table, to my direct left are seated four TAA, a TPP, a LPP, an unknown, the TAA aforementioned, and a SLPP.
The "established" TAA, who in this hand is in the CO, just lost a blind steal attempt on the button last hand. He had oepned with QT, bet the flop unimproved, bet the turn vs a check-called with a gutshot and overcards and turn unimproved, and took a free-showdown on a four-straight board with rivered top pair. Villain in that hand (me) shows T9s for the win, with two pair.
----------------
PF:
Folded to the TAA, who open-raises in the CO. Button folds, I call in the SB with J9s, TAA in the BB calls.
Flop is AA4r. 3-ways for 6 bets. I bet.
My plan is: If the BB TAA calls, this is my last money in the pot. If the CO calls, I'm torn between this being my last shot and betting the turn once more to see if he will fold something. If he raises me, it's all over, of course.
Is this reasonable?
--Dave.
Looking around the table, to my direct left are seated four TAA, a TPP, a LPP, an unknown, the TAA aforementioned, and a SLPP.
The "established" TAA, who in this hand is in the CO, just lost a blind steal attempt on the button last hand. He had oepned with QT, bet the flop unimproved, bet the turn vs a check-called with a gutshot and overcards and turn unimproved, and took a free-showdown on a four-straight board with rivered top pair. Villain in that hand (me) shows T9s for the win, with two pair.
----------------
PF:
Folded to the TAA, who open-raises in the CO. Button folds, I call in the SB with J9s, TAA in the BB calls.
Flop is AA4r. 3-ways for 6 bets. I bet.
My plan is: If the BB TAA calls, this is my last money in the pot. If the CO calls, I'm torn between this being my last shot and betting the turn once more to see if he will fold something. If he raises me, it's all over, of course.
Is this reasonable?
--Dave.