PDA

View Full Version : a 50+5 MTT final table hand (like to get STTF opinions)


psyduck
09-02-2005, 05:38 AM
Okay push? Everyone has been playing tight so far. I have only shown down AQ an orbit ago. I hated myself after this push because I'm pushing into the chipleader (Baddbo), but I have ~9BB.


***** Hand History for Game 2639405492 *****
NL Texas Hold'em Trny:15375592 Level:16 Blinds (2000/4000) - Friday, September 02, 05:05:34 EDT 2005
Table Multi-Table(444763) Table #1 (Real Money)
Seat 1 is the button
Total number of players : 9
Seat 2: Hero ( $36948 )
Seat 6: Chump ( $33695 )
Seat 4: ducgoose ( $113328 )
Seat 10: Bullywulf ( $120 )
Seat 1: TeachingPro ( $38959 )
Seat 3: Baddbo ( $153200 )
Seat 5: db281081 ( $12952 )
Seat 7: TomA318 ( $55050 )
Seat 9: zombi31 ( $25748 )
Trny:15375592 Level:16
Blinds (2000/4000)
** Dealing down cards **
Dealt to Hero [ 6d 8d ]
ducgoose folds.
db281081 folds.
Chump folds.
TomA318 folds.
zombi31 folds.
Bullywulf folds.
TeachingPro folds.
Hero is all-In [34948]


This would be an auto- allin on a STT assuming a tightish range for the big stack (nothing he had done told me otherwise). Does the same principle exist in a very top heavy payout MTT structure?

In retrospect, it was such a marginal all-in, and since big stacks tend to loosen up compared to medium stack, I should have either completed or folded.

*SMACK*

(xposted in MTT forum)

09-02-2005, 07:07 AM
This depends a lot on the payout structure and on your read on the chip leader. If the next jump in payout is significant, you should wait for the incredibly short stack to go out before making a move like this. If chip leader's calling range is wide, this is an obvious fold.

durron597
09-02-2005, 07:37 AM
I would let this one go because you aren't desperate, SB raises don't get much respect (for obvious reasons) and the shorty is so short.

Scuba Chuck
09-02-2005, 01:57 PM
You're right that this is an easy STT push, as your cards are likely to run well hot and cold here.

But you're not looking at this from the right perspective. usually in an STT, if you've got ~9BBs, then you need to be aggressive. But in this instance, of the 9 remaining players, 4 are still below you in terms of chip stack size, and 1 is pretty much your equal. So, essentially, you're about the 4th largest stack. Thinking in these terms, would this change your decision?

BTW, not much equity transfer is lost by giving your SB to the bigstack here. And except for Seat 4, this would not be true against any of the other stacks.

MegaBet
09-02-2005, 02:35 PM
Your M is still over 6 so it's not desperation time. At least wait until shorty goes out before attempting this.

psyduck
09-02-2005, 03:00 PM
Yeah the move was slightly stupid because of the micro-stack and the tiny stack. Here was Adar's reply in the MTT forum (scroll down):

http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showflat.php?Cat=&Number=3299854&page=1&view=colla psed&sb=5&o=14&fpart=all&vc=1

Scuba Chuck
09-02-2005, 09:16 PM
Essentially his response was more eloquent (and informational) than mine. LOL