USC/Hawaii O/U 66 EASY OVER

[hogua]

Last year, the score was 61-32. Granted Hawaii lost all their firepower and SC lost some seriously talented starters on defense, but the over looks pretty good here.

Even SC's third string should be walking over these guys.

Even if SC "trys" to keep the score down by running out the clock once they get way ahead, their third string RB's should tear up Hawaii's first string D.

Seems like a no brainer to me. (Of course, I bleed Cardinal and Gold, so I may be a bit biased)

[ QUOTE ]
SC lost some seriously talented starters on defense, but the over looks pretty good here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Isn't that an argument for the over? lol

[ QUOTE ]
Even if SC "trys"...

Of course, I bleed Cardinal and Gold, so I may be a bit biased

[/ QUOTE ]

UCLA grad here...is this the sort of education 'SC students get nowadays for their $35K/year?

In all seriousness though, the over sounds fine. I don't "trie" betting CFB.

[hogua]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
SC lost some seriously talented starters on defense, but the over looks pretty good here.

[/ QUOTE ]

Isn't that an argument for the over? Yes, I meant that with last year's score, SC returning offensive starter, and a lot of new guys on D, the over looks good.

[scalf]

/images/graemlins/grin.gif..hog:

nice post: but, what if haw does not score; they lost a heap'o offenxe and usc has a quantum leap better def than they usually see..

gl

/images/graemlins/blush.gif /images/graemlins/club.gif