deepdowntruth
08-29-2005, 12:41 AM
I promise you I'm not a shill or anything, but I read an article on another site about a general approach to SNG play, and am wondering if this is a good general schema to attack SNGs. (Particularly, the advice to see a lot of cheap flops early and try to double up.)
Article is here: http://www.pokertips.org/strategy/nl-tourneys.php
The other approach I hear, for the early phase, is to use your typical TAG cash game strategy the first few rounds and only to loosen up your raising requirements as the blinds rise in the middle phase, (but to keep pretty tight with regard to calling raises.)
The issue that bothers me about waiting around for cards in the first few rounds is that the early chip leaders are thereby determined by who gets the cards (which is the same for everyone, long-term) or by being one of those who *aren't* waiting around for cards. And then of course, a lot of the last phase of blind-stealing etc. is determined by coinflips. So if I just wait around till I get good cards and don't, I'm short-stacked and I will only win as many of these as my starting cards allow (and therefore the same as everyone else, ultimately, except for those who beat the game very often without cards).
So to me it seems that an early TAG strategy isn't optimal, but it's assuredly better than being the moron that I often find myself being.
I'm really trying to get as good at these as I possibly can and am stuck in $11/$22 land and don't want to be.
Comments?
Article is here: http://www.pokertips.org/strategy/nl-tourneys.php
The other approach I hear, for the early phase, is to use your typical TAG cash game strategy the first few rounds and only to loosen up your raising requirements as the blinds rise in the middle phase, (but to keep pretty tight with regard to calling raises.)
The issue that bothers me about waiting around for cards in the first few rounds is that the early chip leaders are thereby determined by who gets the cards (which is the same for everyone, long-term) or by being one of those who *aren't* waiting around for cards. And then of course, a lot of the last phase of blind-stealing etc. is determined by coinflips. So if I just wait around till I get good cards and don't, I'm short-stacked and I will only win as many of these as my starting cards allow (and therefore the same as everyone else, ultimately, except for those who beat the game very often without cards).
So to me it seems that an early TAG strategy isn't optimal, but it's assuredly better than being the moron that I often find myself being.
I'm really trying to get as good at these as I possibly can and am stuck in $11/$22 land and don't want to be.
Comments?