Poker Jon
04-12-2003, 07:01 AM
Hey all,
I have been playing both 1 and 2 table sit and go tourneys online at Pokerstars and have been wondering whether the 2 table S&G are a bit of a false economy.
As far as I am concerned, there is a lot more opportunity to get knocked out in a 2 table tourney, for not that much more reward. Take a $10 game for example.
2 Table 1 Table
1st = $72 1st = $45
2nd = $54 2nd = $27
3rd = $36 3rd = $18
4th = $18
As far as I am concerned the only real advantage you get is by coming first which is obvious as there is more money to be won.
You get the same money for coming 4th and 3rd respectively, but you have to come 3/9 in the one table tourney but 2/9 (4/18) in the 2 table tourney.
Obviously, tactics are different. I know that in the 2 table tourney you should be aiming to win more tournaments as the prize is 'more lucrative' so to speak, but is it worth it, in such a small tourney, to risk all of your chips for a prize so small. It seems like you have to play as you in a multi table tourney to be getting the 1st and 2nd places in a 2 table tourney to make them worthwhile. 4th places just arnt good enough. However, in single table tourneys, you can literally wait for half the opposition to knock each other out before you even look at your computer screen and make a decision, thus you only really have to play against 5 players, hence making your placing that much easier.
I know I am looking at this in a hugely simplistic format, with no variables being taken into account, but just wanted some thoughts on my ideas.
I have been playing both 1 and 2 table sit and go tourneys online at Pokerstars and have been wondering whether the 2 table S&G are a bit of a false economy.
As far as I am concerned, there is a lot more opportunity to get knocked out in a 2 table tourney, for not that much more reward. Take a $10 game for example.
2 Table 1 Table
1st = $72 1st = $45
2nd = $54 2nd = $27
3rd = $36 3rd = $18
4th = $18
As far as I am concerned the only real advantage you get is by coming first which is obvious as there is more money to be won.
You get the same money for coming 4th and 3rd respectively, but you have to come 3/9 in the one table tourney but 2/9 (4/18) in the 2 table tourney.
Obviously, tactics are different. I know that in the 2 table tourney you should be aiming to win more tournaments as the prize is 'more lucrative' so to speak, but is it worth it, in such a small tourney, to risk all of your chips for a prize so small. It seems like you have to play as you in a multi table tourney to be getting the 1st and 2nd places in a 2 table tourney to make them worthwhile. 4th places just arnt good enough. However, in single table tourneys, you can literally wait for half the opposition to knock each other out before you even look at your computer screen and make a decision, thus you only really have to play against 5 players, hence making your placing that much easier.
I know I am looking at this in a hugely simplistic format, with no variables being taken into account, but just wanted some thoughts on my ideas.