ROI, finish in the $ etc...

[MobbDeep]

Hi there,

I'm pretty new to S&G stats.
I've been playing alot S&G but not looked very much at stats or really played serious.
So now i've started play more serious and started using pokertracker.

http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/6112/pt6zf.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

I know 36 games is a very very very very very very small sample.
I just wanna know what to look at and what I can expect?
what ROI is considerd bad, good, very good?
Same for Finish In The $ and Average Finish.
I know that i had about 46% Finish In The Money total over all games I've played this year (about 500).
I expect to finish in the money 50%, is that to much?

Also what bankroll should I have for $30 S&G?
I started with $600, is that to small?

Thanks!

[Myst]

[ QUOTE ]
Hi there,

I'm pretty new to S&G stats.
I've been playing alot S&G but not looked very much at stats or really played serious.
So now i've started play more serious and started using pokertracker.

http://img297.imageshack.us/img297/6112/pt6zf.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

I know 36 games is a very very very very very very small sample.
I just wanna know what to look at and what I can expect?
what ROI is considerd bad, good, very good?
Same for Finish In The $ and Average Finish.
I know that i had about 46% Finish In The Money total over all games I've played this year (about 500).
I expect to finish in the money 50%, is that to much?

Also what bankroll should I have for $30 S&G?
I started with $600, is that to small?

Thanks!

[/ QUOTE ]

DAFS

[ghostface]

600 is a little small but you have more than enough now. BR is generally 30x buy-in. You current winrate is unsustainable though. 20% would be an average winrate, and 30% would be a good one. The only bad ROI is a negative one, unless you are concerned with hourly rate. Then you might be able to win more at a more beatable level.

[solucky]

i also start and have now 70 tourneys played on a lower level. Funny thing 23 tourneys 5$ ROI 0 47 tourneys 10$ ROI 56. So it seems the sit and goes are verry streaky

[Jman28]

Should answer all your questions (http://forumserver.twoplustwo.com/showthreaded.php?Cat=&Number=2821605&page=0&view=c ollapsed&sb=5&o=14&fpart=1)

[Sabrazack]

36 games isnt even a sample size.

NEVER AGAIN WILL YOU POST WITHOUT READING THE FAQ FIRST!

[Freudian]

[ QUOTE ]
600 is a little small but you have more than enough now. BR is generally 30x buy-in. You current winrate is unsustainable though. 20% would be an average winrate, and 30% would be a good one. The only bad ROI is a negative one, unless you are concerned with hourly rate. Then you might be able to win more at a more beatable level.

[/ QUOTE ]

20% ROI is average at the 30+3? I think a lot of 2+2ers would be delighted to have a long run ROI that high at the 33s.

[citanul]

poster added to the "don't pay attention to his advice list," 'ghostface'.

citanul

[Myst]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
600 is a little small but you have more than enough now. BR is generally 30x buy-in. You current winrate is unsustainable though. 20% would be an average winrate, and 30% would be a good one. The only bad ROI is a negative one, unless you are concerned with hourly rate. Then you might be able to win more at a more beatable level.

[/ QUOTE ]

20% ROI is average at the 30+3? I think a lot of 2+2ers would be delighted to have a long run ROI that high at the 33s.

[/ QUOTE ]

OMFG, You f*kin n00b, you can have as high as 80% ROI over a LoNG samplE SiZe of 50. THEN YOU CNA QUIT YOUR DAYY JOB AND PLAWY PKAH FOR A LIVIIIN.

LIVE T3H DREEAEM.

[Ogre]

I had an ROI of 358.7% over 3 sngs once

[raptor517]

[ QUOTE ]
I had an ROI of 358.7% over 3 sngs once

[/ QUOTE ]

haha i win i had it over 4. what now. /images/graemlins/wink.gif holla