not so good time for QQ?

[bluefeet]

One I witnessed from the sidelines (later getting 1st..ship it, holla, all that good stuff /images/graemlins/smirk.gif)...

All three involved had been pretty solid up to this point. What do you think of Seat 5's laydown? Would you???

$55+5 turbo
PokerStars Game : Tournament #99999999, Hold'em No Limit - Level VII (100/200) - 2005/08/22 - 21:42:38 (ET)
Seat #2 is the button

Seat 2: (5710 in chips)
bluefeet (1630 in chips)
Seat 5: (4145 in chips)
Seat 6: (2015 in chips)
t25 antes
bluefeet: posts small blind 100
Seat 5: posts big blind 200
*** HOLE CARDS ***
Dealt to bluefeet [3h 5h]
Seat 6: raises 800 to 1000
Seat 2: raises 2200 to 3200
bluefeet folds
Seat 5 said, "ugh" <font color="red"> (later claimed to have QQ - which I believed </font>
Seat 5 folds after a lengthy delay
Seat 6: calls all-in

[Nacarno]

I like the laydown. Two short stacks makes it an even easier decision I think.

[HighestCard]

I;ve never played a 55, but im guessing this is a standard fold at this level since the re-raiser obviously has a good enough hand where he wants the inital raiser to call.

Btw,
Thanks bluefeet for responding to my "a few hands" post about a week ago. Your comments were quite helpful.

[bigt439]

Hmmmm, I think QQ is my cutoff for repushing there. His range could be pretty big I think (big stack raising to isolate), so I think you do quite well against him. The problem with the shorty argument is that they're not that short at all with the size of the blinds. Read dependent though.